FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
FT2 accuses Arbcom -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> FT2 accuses Arbcom
Peter Damian
post
Post #1


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined:
Member No.: 4,212



A long question to Coren from FT2 here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arb...Coren/Questions , accusing Arbcom of 'gaming' the elections this time last year.

Actually he is right, as I have pointed out elsewhere http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=34246 .

An arbitrator has just emailed me to say that he found the whole thing problematic all along (yes but why didn't you say so at the time).

This post has been edited by Peter Damian:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Peter Damian
post
Post #2


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined:
Member No.: 4,212



QUOTE

any failure of complete compliance will result in pain and quite likely more real and difficult
unavoidable results than anything you ever wrote when you pretended to be
<redacted>, because I plan to clean up thoroughly, and to do that I'll
probably end up ripping your ego apart


QUOTE

Your wife is a lawyer and by the time this is done, don't
think about legal action, because the only legal action will be if she wants
rid of you ... there are some who understand no language other than force


QUOTE

There are many web pages that Tarantino and Proabivouac have not found, yet,
that confirmed identity, deception, guilt. They also haven't found many
other things. They made errors like confusing your wife and sister. They
don't know about your children, whose names you put in the public domain and
used as covers (which would disgust most people including your family). They
don't recognize that the <redacted>' IP means <redacted>'s employer is legitimately
fair to be brought into the frame to ascertain just what it extended to.
Your word or purported explanations mean nothing, by the way.


That one gives the lie to Coren's defence of FT2. Coren claimed that FT2 was concerned about what Wikipedia Review might do. What he means by the IP remark is that his wife's employer can be contacted because checkuser traced the IP to her workplace.

QUOTE

You have a deadline below, and I'll repeat everything as often as you need to hear it, and consider concerns all the way till then. One minute after that, gloves come off all the way,
without any further warning, starting with <redacted>'s workplace for evidence,
and the Department of Health, and probably unavoidably, ending with family
or someone will inform the police. Do you actually love your family, or need
them? Or are they toys too? Sacrifice your fictions, games and abuses for
yourself and them. Put right the abuses you have done over the last 3 years
and you may survive, or take complete responsibility for any unfortunate
results of forcible removal. I don't know <redacted>, but she seems tough, and
people don't like being deceived. I don't know what settlement you'd get,
but I bet it won't include the things in real life you care most about. Risk
it if you like. Your call. And watch me not minding if it hurts you to put
this all right.


QUOTE

Yes doing this is going to hurt and humiliate you. I couldn't care less. No,
avoiding hurt is not an option in life.


QUOTE

Then when that's done you can fuck off to number <redacted house number> to reminiscence with
<redacted list of family names> and the
family. Or did you think I might be guessing at knowing far more than you
thought?


QUOTE

Email done. Now get busy. When the deadline is over, if all terms are not
fully complied with then the gloves come off without warning, and your
family etc, get to know what's up. You dragged your wife <redacted>, her
employer <redacted>, and your son <redacted> into this. Same with your co-worker
<redacted>, the beautician <redacted>, your boss <redacted>, the boudoir's owner <redacted> whose business you placed at risk, and the rest.


This post has been edited by Somey:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post
Post #3


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 28th November 2011, 1:45pm) *

Your wife is a lawyer and by the time this is done, don't
think about legal action, because the only legal action will be if she wants
rid of you ... there are some who understand no language other than force


What, no one finds it comical that

a) here's FT2, making a legal threat....while at the same time, his fellow admins are aggressively blocking people for doing the same on WP?

b) he adds the threat of physical violence to it? What's he going to do, attack MB with doggie treats?

c) even after that, Arbcom continued to smugly sit on its collective ass and pretend everything is okay?

You could write yet another textbook, just about FT2.

Wikipedia is the corrupt, degenerate world, writ small.
Very small. Very petty.

(I've got a few other links that apply, but there is no need for them. That Arbcom leak says it all.)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)