Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

_ Editors _ Beeblebrox

Posted by: Ottava

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&diff=prev&oldid=541130426. He treats the Wiki like some kind of childish playground. It is bad enough that almost all of his actions in general (editing, admin, etc) are violations or net negatives, but things like that should have led to a quick boot.

It is obvious that Wikipedia is truly flawed.



As a side note - Beeblebrox indefs Cla for "outing" when Moreschi outs me in a highly offensive way( when I never identified like Russavia has) and didn't even get blocked for it. Rules are clearly made to be used only for their greatest harm to users.

Posted by: The Joy

QUOTE(Ottava @ Fri 1st March 2013, 1:42pm) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&diff=prev&oldid=541130426. He treats the Wiki like some kind of childish playground. It is bad enough that almost all of his actions in general (editing, admin, etc) are violations or net negatives, but things like that should have led to a quick boot.

It is obvious that Wikipedia is truly flawed.



As a side note - Beeblebrox indefs Cla for "outing" when Moreschi outs me in a highly offensive way( when I never identified like Russavia has) and didn't even get blocked for it. Rules are clearly made to be used only for their greatest harm to users.


I thought about that. Moreschi was just warned about "outing" you, wasn't he?

Posted by: Ottava

QUOTE(The Joy @ Fri 1st March 2013, 8:55pm) *

QUOTE(Ottava @ Fri 1st March 2013, 1:42pm) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&diff=prev&oldid=541130426. He treats the Wiki like some kind of childish playground. It is bad enough that almost all of his actions in general (editing, admin, etc) are violations or net negatives, but things like that should have led to a quick boot.

It is obvious that Wikipedia is truly flawed.



As a side note - Beeblebrox indefs Cla for "outing" when Moreschi outs me in a highly offensive way( when I never identified like Russavia has) and didn't even get blocked for it. Rules are clearly made to be used only for their greatest harm to users.


I thought about that. Moreschi was just warned about "outing" you, wasn't he?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottava_Rima_restrictions#Moreschi_admonished

He did it with malicious intent and making really nasty anti-Catholic statements along with it. It was obvious that all of his and his friends claims that they had legitimate desires to follow the rules were null and void. The double standards are obvious. If you notice, Folantine still has an old grudges page which lists all of my comments that led to multiple RfC s against his destroying the Persian Empire page. I had experts, books, and even natives in the language backing me up while he just had a long history of POV warring against history in general. The Battleground blocks against people with similar pages in the past would never happen there, and it is obvious that he has malicious intent that continues even beyond my ability to edit.

Odd how such people are given the power there.


Posted by: Ottava

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Risker&curid=21604049&diff=541930061&oldid=541929275. Bud is short for buddy and has nothing to do with being male. Civility gone amok done to harass people and suck up to people with power.

The worst combination of bad behavior.

Risker was clearly wrong to claim that people can't integrate old works into their own speeches, especially when sayings or expressions are well known (she was quite able to find the source). Yet Beeblebrox comes to the front to cuase more problems. Anti-content people spreading as much hate around as possible. What a joke to even attempt to call such a place an encyclopedia.