FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Wikimedia Foundation's new CharityNavigator rating -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Wikimedia Foundation's new CharityNavigator rating
kaldari
post
Post #1


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 4
Joined:
Member No.: 3,961
Thanks to last year's higher program expense ratio and improvements in CharityNavigator's rating methodology, the Wikimedia Foundation is now given 4 stars (the highest possible rating) in all categories: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?...ary&orgid=11212
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
GlassBeadGame
post
Post #2


Dharma Bum
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined:
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981
QUOTE(kaldari @ Wed 21st September 2011, 3:59pm) *

Thanks to last year's higher program expense ratio and improvements in CharityNavigator's rating methodology, the Wikimedia Foundation is now given 4 stars (the highest possible rating) in all categories: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?...ary&orgid=11212


Well, I guess we were wrong.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SB_Johnny
post
Post #3


It wasn't me who made honky-tonk angels
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,128
Joined:
Member No.: 8,272
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 21st September 2011, 6:03pm) *

QUOTE(kaldari @ Wed 21st September 2011, 3:59pm) *

Thanks to last year's higher program expense ratio and improvements in CharityNavigator's rating methodology, the Wikimedia Foundation is now given 4 stars (the highest possible rating) in all categories: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?...ary&orgid=11212

Well, I guess we were wrong.

Is charitynavigator related to S&P?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NuclearWarfare
post
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 382
Joined:
Member No.: 9,506
QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Wed 21st September 2011, 10:32pm) *

QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 21st September 2011, 6:03pm) *

QUOTE(kaldari @ Wed 21st September 2011, 3:59pm) *

Thanks to last year's higher program expense ratio and improvements in CharityNavigator's rating methodology, the Wikimedia Foundation is now given 4 stars (the highest possible rating) in all categories: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?...ary&orgid=11212

Well, I guess we were wrong.

Is charitynavigator related to S&P?

Yes, in that people cite it when they agree with it and ignore it/laugh at their methodology when they don't.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
kaldari   Wikimedia Foundation's new CharityNavigator rating  
thekohser   And to think, it only took them 3 or 4 years of 1-...  
Cino   Is this rating only done once a year, or do we see...  

 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)