QUOTE(thekohser @ Sat 30th October 2010, 10:36pm)
Despite Jimbo Wales' best efforts to personally stamp out the child porn on Wikimedia Commons, the problem seems to persist, according to
some blogger who makes a couple of dollars per article.
Nonetheless, the guy seems to write a damn good article that's worth sending to the FBI.
I tried to leave a comment at the article but the spam filter stopped it. The comment was;
QUOTE
By Tungsten Carbide
The Wikipedia culture is one that prides itself on being open minded and un-censored. Objectionable images at Wikipedia get an automatic protection under the banner of "anti-censorship", which has led to thousands of images of porn residing on Wikipedia servers with negligible editorial value. In fact, anyone endeavoring to exercise editorial judgment by deleting surplus porn will fail. Just ask Jimbo Wales;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?t...th=5&tagfilter= (The red links are porn images he deleted, the blue links are his deletions that have been reversed, because those images are so vital, apparently.)
Wikipedians think censorship is evil when it comes to deleting porn, but they absolutely love it when it's used to silence critics, like this article's author who's been banned from Wikipedia's mailing lists and chatrooms;
http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-nati...heart-contractsShow me an image of a man sucking his own wiener and I'll show you a hundred frothing at the mouth wikipedians smacking their fists on the table, demanding that it be used to illustrate an article. (warning, not safe for work;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofellatio )
Teen pornography continues unabated
