The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> 

This forum is populated by RSS feeds from various news sources. Members may start topics here and reply to them, but please limit new topics to links to actual news stories. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to the Wikipedia:Glossary.

For accurate information about the "Wikipedia vs. Britannica" study by Nature, please read this.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wikipedia's Top 50 Articles Reveal What Captivated The Masses In 2017 - UPROXX
Newsfeed
post Thu 4th January 2018, 10:11pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885



[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNG0PX9G2fUJbKocDu15YYtjnZsklw&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&ei=bbFOWtCDBMXOqgLXq72ACw&url=http://uproxx.com/life/wikipedia-top-english-articles-2017/"][img]https://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBKjympFesYWNdJfCfui1nfPRFJXKaYb_7OuN_2aGJGufLVQmL3ay5MsWZ7mEj_a4-loFEEM3s[/img]
UPROXX[/url]
Wikipedia's Top 50 Articles Reveal What Captivated The Masses In 2017
UPROXX
The letters “WTF” sum up 2017 perfectly. All we know is a whole lot happened, but we're not quite sure what. Don't get us wrong, there were some wonderful moments, but there was also a whole lot of confusion. A pinch of madness. A dash of mania. We ...



View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 1 18, 9:05pm