FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
The new Hasbara-esque scandal (but worse) -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> The new Hasbara-esque scandal (but worse)
yow
post
Post #1


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined:
Member No.: 2,374



From Electronic Intifada

A pro-Israel pressure group is orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged.

A series of emails by members and associates of the pro-Israel group CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America), provided to The Electronic Intifada (EI), indicate the group is engaged in what one activist termed a "war" on Wikipedia.

A 13 March action alert signed by Gilead Ini, a "Senior Research Analyst" at CAMERA, calls for "volunteers who can work as 'editors' to ensure" that Israel-related articles on Wikipedia are "free of bias and error, and include necessary facts and context." However, subsequent communications indicate that the group not only wanted to keep the effort secret from the media, the public, and Wikipedia administrators, but that the material they intended to introduce included discredited claims that could smear Palestinians and Muslims and conceal Israel's true history.


AND MUCH MORE.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Somey
post
Post #2


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,816
Joined:
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



More discussion on this subject is taking place in this thread...

But I'd say the WP reaction has so far been one of yammering and general confusion, just like their reaction to pretty much everything. They blocked User:Zeq for a year, though... ironically, the block had nothing to do with Zeq's involvement in an Israeli-propaganda meat-puppeting scheme, but rather he was blocked for violating WP's No Personal Attacks policy by calling User:ChrisO a "poopyhead."
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Disillusioned Lackey
post
Post #3


Unregistered









QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 23rd April 2008, 3:34am) *

action to pretty much everything. They blocked User:Zeq for a year, though... ironically, the block had nothing to do with Zeq's involvement in an Israeli-propaganda meat-puppeting scheme, but rather he was blocked for violating WP's No Personal Attacks policy by calling User:ChrisO a "poopyhead."

That's hysterical.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
yow   The new Hasbara-esque scandal (but worse)  
the fieryangel   Interesting : So, how many administrators are i...  
Eleland   They blocked User:Zeq for a year, though... ironi...  
Merzbow   As of yet nobody has been able to produce a shred ...  
jorge   As of yet nobody has been able to produce a shred...  
Tarc   As of yet nobody has been able to produce a shred...  
Milton Roe   [quote name='Merzbow' post='95510' date='Wed 23rd...  
Saltimbanco   So we now have the Hasbara Fellowships, the JayJG ...  
Milton Roe   If Wikipedia wanted to deserve to be considered a...  
Proabivouac   If Wikipedia wanted to deserve to be considered a...  
Saltimbanco   Re Jayjg's "watch my back," I doubt...  
Tarc   Re Jayjg's "watch my back," I doubt ...  
Saltimbanco   Re Jayjg's "watch my back," I doubt...  
Saltimbanco   What would it have to become, though? I mean, is i...  
Milton Roe   What would it have to become, though? I mean, is ...  
guy   What would it have to become, though? I mean, is ...  
jorge   There are those who doubt the impartiality of Bri...  
Moulton   There are those who doubt the impartiality of Brit...  
Saltimbanco   There are those who doubt the impartiality of Br...  
guy   [quote name='guy' post='96178' date='Fri 25th Apr...  
Saltimbanco   [quote name='guy' post='96178' date='Fri 25th Ap...  
Lar   [quote name='guy' post='96178' date='Fri 25th Apr...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)