|
|
|
Rlevse returned, Has Rlevse returned to plague FAC? |
|
|
chrisoff |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined:
Member No.: 17,248
|
|
|
|
|
chrisoff |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined:
Member No.: 17,248
|
|
|
|
|
mbz1 |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined:
Member No.: 25,791
|
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:38am) QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am) There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.
Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity. But what is more severe? And what this https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w...oldid=474489625 is about? Is TungstenCarbide is also Rlevse (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/wtf.gif) Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked. This post has been edited by mbz1:
|
|
|
|
chrisoff |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined:
Member No.: 17,248
|
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 9:08pm) QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:38am) QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am) There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.
Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity. But what is more severe? Accused is not the same as proven. PumpkinSky was accused by SandyGeorgia. But so far the checks on his edits have not revealed massive copyvio. When SandyGeorgia blanked one of his DYKs on the main page, the evidence of copyvio was borderline - something any of us could have mistakenly done.
|
|
|
|
iii |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 114
Joined:
Member No.: 38,992
|
QUOTE(Cla68 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 8:38pm) Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.
I can't let this slide. Everyone outside of the Wikipedia-world knows what plagiarism is. No one outside of the Wikipedia world will know what any of the these "abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing" buzzwords are supposed to mean. Couldn't you have said, "defamation, arguing, and inserting personal bias"?
|
|
|
|
trenton |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 161
Joined:
Member No.: 8,237
|
Poor guy.... goes to show you that Randy's wiki-addiction is stronger than any principles he claimed to have, as he was an arbitrator who came down particularly hard on returning "vanished" users. Randy's problem is that he's not particularly smart (witness the whole Randy in Boise situation, and not knowing what plagiarism is). That the guy feels that he must write "Featured Articles" is a symptom of Wikipedia's perverse system of climbing the ladder. As for Mr. Raul: QUOTE(Raul654) For the record, this is absolutely not the first time Rlevse has come back after his RTV. About a week after he left, he created another account. A firestorm ensued, and he left after a day or two. I am wracking my brain but I cannot remember the name of that account. (Someone help me here) Raul654 (talk) 22:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Well you can't remember because this is another one of your fantasies.... (we can ask Everyking about Raul's "recollections"). To set the chain of events straight, Rlevse said he'd quit, then started editing again a few days later, then "vanished".
|
|
|
|
alan323 |
|
Neophyte
Group: Contributors
Posts: 13
Joined:
Member No.: 7,168
|
QUOTE(iii @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 7:03am) QUOTE(Cla68 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 8:38pm) Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity.
I can't let this slide. Everyone outside of the Wikipedia-world knows what plagiarism is. No one outside of the Wikipedia world will know what any of the these "abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing" buzzwords are supposed to mean. Couldn't you have said, "defamation, arguing, and inserting personal bias"? Or simply 'disagreeing with Cla68'.
|
|
|
|
A Horse With No Name |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
|
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 9:08pm) Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked. It's the Great Pumpkin, Jimmy Wales! (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
|
mbz1 |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined:
Member No.: 25,791
|
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:49pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Wed 1st February 2012, 9:08pm) Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked. It's the Great Pumpkin, Jimmy Wales! (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) It looks that rather sooner than later they will have to stop blocking socks of banned editors simply because most "new" editors will be socks of old, banned ones. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
|
TungstenCarbide |
|
Allegedly shot down by stray Ukrainian missile
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,405
Joined:
Member No.: 10,787
|
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 2:08am) QUOTE(Cla68 @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:38am) QUOTE(chrisoff @ Thu 2nd February 2012, 1:36am) There hasn't been a CU; it is merely vested admin's Moni3's abuse of admin tools (once again) . There's no proof that I'm aware of.
Rlevse was accused of plagiarism, while ChrisO/Prioryman merely engaged in abusing BLPs, edit warring, and POV editing. I guess there is a difference in severity. But what is more severe? And what this https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w...oldid=474489625 is about? Is TungstenCarbide is also Rlevse (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/wtf.gif) Ah, I see, wikipidiots believed that PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
because their user names are alike, but now they confirmed PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
, which means PumknPi (T-C-L-K-R-D)
is not Rlevse, but then it means that PumpkinSky (T-C-L-K-R-D)
whoever he is was not abusing multiple accounts, and should be unblocked. just a coinkidink - although I'm tempted to have some fun with this. There are a whole bunch of variations on that account name and only one of them is me - just goes to show how gullible and idiotic some of these blocking admins are. Oh, and by the way, Tnxman307 is a Bastard. He made me reboot my modem and get a new account - I want those 45 seconds of my life back, dammit. This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide:
|
|
|
|
chrisoff |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined:
Member No.: 17,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |