The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> JzG Drops the C-bomb and the F-bombs, ...admins pretend he's not there
Piperdown
post Mon 18th February 2008, 5:38pm
Post #1


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=68914708

Yeah, that's just great.
The single most offensive word that any woman I know tells me they could ever read/hear.

Yet admins are indignant when I point out what many (including El Reg) consider to be a curious use of Cartoon Dancing Girls (lol), but not the "C" word? Too much.....because it suits their wikicareer at that moment to put on a front.

They "don't have a problem with" all this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cla68/Rf...ersonal_attacks

I just want to know. Why do you half-truthers look the other way at this? I'm just interested in how groupthink works.

That admins have nothing to say about the on-WP actions of Sir Guy speak volumes about their hypocrisy and selective indignation.

There won't be any replies to this, lol.

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Mon 18th February 2008, 5:46pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post Mon 18th February 2008, 5:57pm
Post #2


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined: Sun 11th Feb 2007, 2:45pm
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Not that it really defends such usage or anything, but JzG's cited response was in reply to a rather nasty personal attack on him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:00pm
Post #3


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



QUOTE(dtobias @ Mon 18th February 2008, 5:57pm) *

Not that it really defends such usage or anything, but JzG's cited response was in reply to a rather nasty personal attack on him.


Yes, so they both should be banned off the planet. That was strike 199 against JzG.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:14pm
Post #4


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



As we've discussed elsewhere it doesn't have the same connotations in the UK - especially in certain contexts, were it is merely just a funny word. It's always a rude word, but people call their cars, dogs, friends, neighbours C**ts with a smile on their face. Its just one of those unusual words, where context is everything. Something like "bitch" can be much more offensive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:19pm
Post #5


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:14pm) *

It's always a rude word, but people call their cars, dogs, friends, neighbours C**ts with a smile on their face.

I don't think so. Which part of the UK is this?

QUOTE
Something like "bitch" can be much more offensive.

Again, I think not.

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Mon 18th February 2008, 6:19pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Yehudi
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:20pm
Post #6


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 531
Joined: Wed 6th Dec 2006, 10:52pm
Member No.: 694



I must strongly agree with Peter here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:21pm
Post #7


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:14pm) *

As we've discussed elsewhere it doesn't have the same connotations in the UK - especially in certain contexts, were it is merely just a funny word. It's always a rude word, but people call their cars, dogs, friends, neighbours C**ts with a smile on their face. Its just one of those unusual words, where context is everything. Something like "bitch" can be much more offensive.


try running that apology by Slimmy and see what she thinks, lol. North Americans don't tolerate any use of that word in any way, any place. And the ten other cusswords that individual ( with on-WP confessions that should render any administation of this site out of the question for him) uses on a daily basis on-WP aren't far behind. When in Rome, you follow Roman rules or you get your just desserts like anyone else there.

Maybe WP admins are taking a 2 year analysis of the use of the C--t word by other wp'ians to determine whether it's a cultural more on-site, and not any actionable offense. After all, some editors require fortnight-long linguistic analysis, offsite-mailing list analysis, and electronic forgery investigations to be thoroughly completely by a committee of very serious bureaucrats who want to get it right (lol), while others just piss off the wrong guy and get instabanned for looking sideways at the wrong loose cannon.

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Mon 18th February 2008, 6:42pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:39pm
Post #8


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined: Sun 11th Feb 2007, 2:45pm
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Piperdown @ Mon 18th February 2008, 1:21pm) *

When in Rome, you follow Roman rules or you get your just desserts like anyone else there.


Mmmmmm.... desserts in Rome... I'll have some spumoni, please.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:49pm
Post #9


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:19pm) *

QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:14pm) *

It's always a rude word, but people call their cars, dogs, friends, neighbours C**ts with a smile on their face.

I don't think so. Which part of the UK is this?

England, Scotland, and Wales.

Now, F-off, yer daft c**t.
FORUM Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:51pm
Post #10


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(dtobias @ Mon 18th February 2008, 12:57pm) *

Not that it really defends such usage or anything, but JzG's cited response was in reply to a rather nasty personal attack on him.


Why is it that nobody seems to question why it is particularly JzG who seems to be such a magnet for "nasty personal attacks" (NPAs)? I could probably identify, oh, about 500 admins who have had combined less than 10% of the number of NPA's of which JzG has somehow found himself on the receiving end.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Mon 18th February 2008, 6:54pm
Post #11


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 18th February 2008, 1:14pm) *

As we've discussed elsewhere it doesn't have the same connotations in the UK — especially in certain contexts, were it is merely just a funny word. It's always a rude word, but people call their cars, dogs, friends, neighbours C**ts with a smile on their face. Its just one of those unusual words, where context is everything. Something like "bitch" can be much more offensive.


All of these usages and ab-usages are highly context-sensitive — if you call that sensitive.

One of my favorite bumper-stickers in my neck o' th' woods is one I saw on a pink pickup truck:

QUOTE

Yeah, I'm A Bitch —
But I'm Not Your Bitch
!



Jonny cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Mon 18th February 2008, 6:56pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dogbiscuit
post Mon 18th February 2008, 7:05pm
Post #12


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



It is a word you can get away with with close friends, typically in a working environment, but it would never be acceptable to use it to someone in a public place where it could be overheard, and I think that is the better analogy.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Mon 18th February 2008, 7:15pm
Post #13


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Mon 18th February 2008, 7:05pm) *

It is a word you can get away with with close friends, typically in a working environment, but it would never be acceptable to use it to someone in a public place where it could be overheard, and I think that is the better analogy.

Oops! I've been saying it for decades in pubs and bars. It's one of my favorite words. Alongside Bollocks! I'm from the old-fashioned John Lydon, Derek and Clive school of swearing. None of your modern stuff. I used to know a guy whose nickname was c**t, because he said it in every sentence.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cedric
post Mon 18th February 2008, 9:02pm
Post #14


General Gato
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,648
Joined: Sun 11th Mar 2007, 5:58pm
From: God's Ain Country
Member No.: 1,116

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 18th February 2008, 1:15pm) *

QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Mon 18th February 2008, 7:05pm) *

It is a word you can get away with with close friends, typically in a working environment, but it would never be acceptable to use it to someone in a public place where it could be overheard, and I think that is the better analogy.

Oops! I've been saying it for decades in pubs and bars. It's one of my favorite words. Alongside Bollocks! I'm from the old-fashioned John Lydon, Derek and Clive school of swearing. None of your modern stuff. I used to know a guy whose nickname was c**t, because he said it in every sentence.

I can't imagine that anyone would be offended by "bollocks" around here. They might be a bit confused about your pronunciation, but would likely otherwise assume you to be an ICAT member. tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guy
post Mon 18th February 2008, 9:05pm
Post #15


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:49pm) *

QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:19pm) *

Which part of the UK is this?

England, Scotland, and Wales.

But not Northern Ireland?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Mon 18th February 2008, 9:19pm
Post #16


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:14pm) *

As we've discussed elsewhere it doesn't have the same connotations in the UK - especially in certain contexts, were it is merely just a funny word. It's always a rude word, but people call their cars, dogs, friends, neighbours C**ts with a smile on their face. Its just one of those unusual words, where context is everything. Something like "bitch" can be much more offensive.


I wouldn't necessarily say that's true- recent polls have said it's viewed as the most offensive swear word by most in the UK. It's the one they can never really use on telly, no matter what the context.

Regardless, everyone knows this is offensive to many people- but it's JzG lol he can mostly act as he likes, he's one of those under a Wikishield given by some admins, where people are allowed to get away with stuff.

QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 18th February 2008, 6:51pm) *

Why is it that nobody seems to question why it is particularly JzG who seems to be such a magnet for "nasty personal attacks" (NPAs)? I could probably identify, oh, about 500 admins who have had combined less than 10% of the number of NPA's of which JzG has somehow found himself on the receiving end.


Maybe because he acts like a c**t (lol just teasing smile.gif )
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Amarkov
post Tue 19th February 2008, 12:21am
Post #17


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 27th Oct 2007, 1:02am
From: Figure it out and get a cookie
Member No.: 3,635

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Mon 18th February 2008, 10:51am) *

QUOTE(dtobias @ Mon 18th February 2008, 12:57pm) *

Not that it really defends such usage or anything, but JzG's cited response was in reply to a rather nasty personal attack on him.


Why is it that nobody seems to question why it is particularly JzG who seems to be such a magnet for "nasty personal attacks" (NPAs)? I could probably identify, oh, about 500 admins who have had combined less than 10% of the number of NPA's of which JzG has somehow found himself on the receiving end.


Well, I tried to do that with MONGO once. We arrived at the conclusion that he is prone to lash out with swearing and incivility, which is what many people want to get out of people they're incivil to. But then people declared that this excused all MONGO's incivility, until such point that absolutely nobody is ever incivil to him.

I'd really rather not go through that again without a good reason.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 5 13, 6:55pm