|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
| anon1234 |
Tue 16th January 2007, 7:02pm
Post
#1
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Inactive Posts: 401 Joined: Sat 8th Apr 2006, 2:40am Member No.: 111 |
Intense discussion: Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#IRC_admin_channel
QUOTE Numerous incidents involving gross incivility on the IRC channel have been brought to the Arbitration Committee's attention. We consider such behavior absolutely unacceptable; to ensure that it does not continue, we have worked with the leadership of the IRC channels to appoint additional channel ops, with a specific mandate to keep Wikimedia IRC channels polite and courteous. Behavior on the IRC channel may be taken into consideration with respect to arbitration cases if it results in disruption on Wikipedia. Fred Bauder for the Arbitration Committee 01:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC) ArbCom is extending its jurisdiction to the admin IRC channel, albeit slowly. Most directly a result of Giano's IRC log postings during his Xmas/New Years meltdown. An end to the admin IRC channel or a move towards the acceptance of full logging and disclosure? |
| Jonny Cache |
Tue 16th January 2007, 7:46pm
Post
#2
|
|
τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 5,100 Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am Member No.: 398 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
An end to the admin IRC channel or a move towards the acceptance of full logging and disclosure? I think that the main effect can probably be summed up in a single edit line: sub [airhead/a*hole] As always, a purely verbal reform. Jonny ![]() This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Tue 16th January 2007, 7:48pm |
| the fieryangel |
Tue 16th January 2007, 10:00pm
Post
#3
|
![]() the Internet Review Corporation is watching you... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 2,990 Joined: Tue 21st Nov 2006, 9:49pm From: It's all in your mind anyway... Member No.: 577 |
|
| Somey |
Wed 17th January 2007, 3:50am
Post
#4
|
![]() Can't actually moderate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,814 Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
I agree - I doubt anything will really change, long term, in the way admins use "back-channel" communications. They might at least pretend to be hard-asses about things like obscenities, ad-hominem bashing, and vulgar topics for the next few weeks though, I suppose... But really, how much fun is that? If people can't go into chatrooms with their wikifriends and type out line after line about furry porn for literally hours on end, what's the point of being involved with Wikipedia in the first place?
Of course, it's hard to control what goes on in IRC anyway - or more to the point, they can't just wipe the history like they can with good ol' MediaWiki. Once something gets said, that's it, it's out there, and the best they can do is claim that the logs were "fabricated," or that the offending conversation was "months ago, so it's no longer relevant." Besides, all the really forward-thinking "cabal" members have been using IM for months now! ![]() |
| Elara |
Wed 17th January 2007, 4:14am
Post
#5
|
![]() Ghoul Inquisitor General ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 155 Joined: Wed 3rd Jan 2007, 2:16am From: Perhaps the Honeycomb Hideout? No. Member No.: 787 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Not just IM, either. How long does it take to register an IRC channel on some IRC network? Spread the #channelname via email to your trusted buddies. Fresh new backchannel.
ArbCom continues to waste it's time... |
| a view from the hive |
Sat 20th January 2007, 4:12am
Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 90 Joined: Sat 30th Dec 2006, 12:42am From: Milky Way Galaxy Member No.: 768 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
I agree - I doubt anything will really change, long term, in the way admins use "back-channel" communications. They might at least pretend to be hard-asses about things like obscenities, ad-hominem bashing, and vulgar topics for the next few weeks though, I suppose... But really, how much fun is that? If people can't go into chatrooms with their wikifriends and type out line after line about furry porn for literally hours on end, what's the point of being involved with Wikipedia in the first place? Of course, it's hard to control what goes on in IRC anyway - or more to the point, they can't just wipe the history like they can with good ol' MediaWiki. Once something gets said, that's it, it's out there, and the best they can do is claim that the logs were "fabricated," or that the offending conversation was "months ago, so it's no longer relevant." Besides, all the really forward-thinking "cabal" members have been using IM for months now! ![]() Wait a second, you know of useful conversation going on in that conversation. I see "lol" "hahahaha" links to digg links to slashdot ![]() ![]() No seriously, nothing happens on IRC. The IRC is like myspace, but even more boring.... |
| Somey |
Sat 20th January 2007, 4:37am
Post
#7
|
![]() Can't actually moderate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,814 Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
|
| LamontStormstar |
Sat 20th January 2007, 4:45am
Post
#8
|
![]() Postmaster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 2,359 Joined: Fri 18th Aug 2006, 7:25am Member No.: 342 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
They should stop using IRC and use some much better chat system. One that firstly, protects peoples IP addresses. Secondly, is run by Wikipedia Admins and not some IRC bullies who don't edit on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia donates to Freenode so they could put that money into their own chat system. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd 5 13, 4:58pm |