Jimbo reassesses WR, His totally unself-interested reaction Options

[Eppur si muove]

Jimbo has posted on Cla86's page again.

I took you seriously

So I thought I'd go see what's up with WR. You gave a passionate defense of it as somehow useful to Wikipedia.

What was just about the first thing I found? You speculating in a disgusting, juvenile, and insulting manner about my personal finances.

I was disappointed, but I also must admit: it's about what I expected from you and from WR.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

[Michaeldsuarez]

(If someone can PM to let me know how to link it, I will do so)

You seem otherwise very smart, but you haven't figured out the "Insert Link" button?

I hope that this helpful image will assist in your learning this important feature of our (and many other) message boards.

"Eppur si muove" has used the BBCode markup for inserting links in the past:

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=289897

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=289873

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=289861

Maybe "Eppur si muove" wanted to know how to find the anchor id to a certain post. If so, then he or she could look at the upper right-hand corner of the post. There should be "post: #<some_number>" (use CTRL+F if you can't find it) in that concern. If you hover your cursor over the anchor (the underlined "#<some_number>"), the text "Show the link to this post" should appear. Check on it, and a box should appear. CTRL+C the URL that appears in the box. There's your anchor to that post.

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez:

[Eppur si muove]

(If someone can PM to let me know how to link it, I will do so)

You seem otherwise very smart, but you haven't figured out the "Insert Link" button?

I hope that this helpful image will assist in your learning this important feature of our (and many other) message boards.

"Eppur si muove" has used the BBCode markup for inserting links in the past:

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=289897

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=289873

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&sh...ndpost&p=289861

Maybe "Eppur si muove" wanted to know how to find the anchor id to a certain post. If so, then he or she could look at the upper right-hand corner of the post. There should be "post: #<some_number>" (use CTRL+F if you can't find it) in that concern. If you hover your cursor over the anchor (the underlined "#<some_number>"), the text "Show the link to this post" should appear. Check on it, and a box should appear. CTRL+C the URL that appears in the box. There's your anchor to that post.

Thanks. Yes I've done the mark up by hand as you said and did not know where to find the post's url.
Most of my discussion of the internet users a system based on CoSy (computer conferencing system). This 1980s technology is supplemented by a 1990s offline reader which I also use for my emails. This clicking on post numbers is far too 21st century to fit into my main experience.

The plus-side of this ancient technology is that I'm immune to most email viruses as they expect a much more advanced mail reader than I use.