There's not a chance of Slimmy prevailing, especially since the point of the proposal is a (or perhaps THE) Wikipedia boogeyman, Daniel Brandt.
As such Slim's proposal that
QUOTE
(2) It's speedy deleted after 72 hours if there are no objections on the talk page;
(3) Any objection would have to be on particular grounds, which our policy would spell out, but which would basically boil down to "this is an important public figure, according to reliable published sources."
(4) Those objecting would file a BLPfD, but there would have to be 75 per cent in favor of retention. Those voting to retain would have to argue that the subject is an important public figure in a particular country. Their public importance would have to be nationwide.
...won't work. It's overbroad, and could conceivably get a large number of living people to apply for their biographies removed because they're not public figures. [On the other hand, it could be fascinating to get Gary Weiss' biography in this process to see the crap fly on his notability]
Besides which, there are large numbers of people who think that any and all information that is already entered in Wikipedia should be retained at all costs, which is easy for them to say because they won't be in the firing line of a lawsuit.