The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dumb RFA oppose, FAIL
Rating  3
powercorrupts
post Sun 1st May 2011, 11:55am
Post #81


.
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 716
Joined: Fri 27th Jun 2008, 10:27pm
Member No.: 6,776



QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 30th April 2011, 12:20am) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Sat 30th April 2011, 12:14am) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=426638066

"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?


I'll take that up. This isn't even Wikipedia, although that hardly seems to effect the ridiculous confidence of nuts like you in churning up hideously irony-free shite like "Are you claiming that I'm lying?".

Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too.

What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on.

I'm not sure you are even British, but I am sure that you and Rod would make a lovely couple. You share so much in common.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Sun 1st May 2011, 3:01pm
Post #82


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Sun 1st May 2011, 12:55pm) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 30th April 2011, 12:20am) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Sat 30th April 2011, 12:14am) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=426638066

"Unlike you I actually have worked in mental health institutions, as a psychologist. I'm not still learning the job, as you and your university friends are." -Malleus

Dumb and dumber. Old fool!

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot? Are you claiming that I'm lying?


I'll take that up. This isn't even Wikipedia, although that hardly seems to effect the ridiculous confidence of nuts like you in churning up hideously irony-free shite like "Are you claiming that I'm lying?".

Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too.

What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on.

I'm not sure you are even British, but I am sure that you and Rod would make a lovely couple. You share so much in common.

You're quite right, of course, how perceptive of you. I'm actually an Albanian builder currently working in Poland.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sun 1st May 2011, 3:17pm
Post #83


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Sun 1st May 2011, 12:55pm) *

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot?



The prime dictim of the internet: "When you argue with a fool, chances are he is doing just the same."
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Sun 1st May 2011, 3:29pm
Post #84


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



QUOTE
"Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too."

"What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular , and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on."


EXXACTLY

This is a guy who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia and posts rampantly here also. Can't possibly have a real job.

This post has been edited by chrisoff: Sun 1st May 2011, 3:30pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Sun 1st May 2011, 4:17pm
Post #85


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(chrisoff @ Sun 1st May 2011, 4:29pm) *

QUOTE
"Based upon your consistent behavioural patterns, it is absolutely impossible to believe you are (or even "have been” - sigh upon WP sigh) a psychologist who has worked in mental institutions. Even applying that ridiculous 'professional machismo' quotient that WPosers like you hang their invisible hats on, and (before anyone mentions it) the old adage about 'crankiness' in the personality-related professions too."

"What you are Malleus is a typical Wikipego who thinks that 'anything goes' for the 'cause' in the great bare knuckle fight that is Wikipedia. Your only qualification is that you are an persistently arrogant nob who can't accept you can ever be wrong about anything. What else do you need? All that matters to maladjusts like you are how many numbers are in your clan, and their particular , and their particular powers and support they have behind them. All the computer tactical game analogies are spot on."


EXXACTLY

This is a guy who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia and posts rampantly here also. Can't possibly have a real job.

An average of 1.6 posts per day over more than three years is a strange definition of "rampant".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Sun 1st May 2011, 4:36pm
Post #86


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



An average of 1.6 posts a day over three years is "rampant" for someone who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Sun 1st May 2011, 5:15pm
Post #87


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(chrisoff @ Sun 1st May 2011, 5:36pm) *

An average of 1.6 posts a day over three years is "rampant" for someone who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia.

You're an malevolent idiot.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
powercorrupts
post Sun 1st May 2011, 6:45pm
Post #88


.
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 716
Joined: Fri 27th Jun 2008, 10:27pm
Member No.: 6,776



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sun 1st May 2011, 4:17pm) *

QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Sun 1st May 2011, 12:55pm) *

Who is the more stupid? The one arguing with the idiot or the idiot?



The prime dictim of the internet: "When you argue with a fool, chances are he is doing just the same."


Well, Mallius wrote that, so you shouldn't really quote it as me.

But I think I get your point - although, frankly, I was simply having a dig. I can't see how he can make an argument of it. (and to be fair, he hasn't.)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
melloden
post Sun 1st May 2011, 7:08pm
Post #89


.
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue 30th Nov 2010, 4:43pm
Member No.: 34,482



QUOTE(Malleus @ Sun 1st May 2011, 5:15pm) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Sun 1st May 2011, 5:36pm) *

An average of 1.6 posts a day over three years is "rampant" for someone who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia.

You're an malevolent idiot.


chrisoff, do you have a life? All you seem to do is throw petty insults at random people on WR.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sun 1st May 2011, 7:42pm
Post #90


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(melloden @ Sun 1st May 2011, 12:08pm) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Sun 1st May 2011, 5:15pm) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Sun 1st May 2011, 5:36pm) *

An average of 1.6 posts a day over three years is "rampant" for someone who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia.

You're an malevolent idiot.


chrisoff, do you have a life? All you seem to do is throw petty insults at random people on WR.


Well, that IS what we pay for. Don't you get your bill?

Malleus the Infinitely Prolonged. Hmmm.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chrisoff
post Sun 1st May 2011, 9:19pm
Post #91


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu 18th Feb 2010, 11:20pm
Member No.: 17,248



QUOTE


Nail on the head!




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Theanima
post Sun 1st May 2011, 9:24pm
Post #92


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu 1st Apr 2010, 1:46pm
Member No.: 18,566



Speaking of dumb opposes, check out this beauty from "Lankiveil".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
melloden
post Mon 2nd May 2011, 2:47am
Post #93


.
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue 30th Nov 2010, 4:43pm
Member No.: 34,482



QUOTE(Theanima @ Sun 1st May 2011, 9:24pm) *

Speaking of dumb opposes, check out this beauty from "Lankiveil".


"You have been blocked by Catfish Jim and the soapdish"--wait, whaaa?!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Anonymous editor
post Mon 2nd May 2011, 2:49am
Post #94


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon 4th Aug 2008, 6:21pm
Member No.: 7,398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Malleus @ Fri 29th April 2011, 6:48pm) *

QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Fri 29th April 2011, 11:37pm) *

frivolity on frivolity

just wondering why he waited until now to say that.

When you say "he" do you mean me? If so then the answer is that I have so many calls on my time that sometimes I miss your stupidity, and it takes me a while to catch up.


Ah Malleus. I missed your favorite debate tactic: use name-calling to cover up your lack of clue.

I made a point which you failed to respond to, and instead you chose to yet again resort to name-calling rather than discuss something in a mature manner.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malleus
post Mon 2nd May 2011, 3:18am
Post #95


Fat Cat
******

Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined: Mon 27th Oct 2008, 3:48pm
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Mon 2nd May 2011, 3:49am) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Fri 29th April 2011, 6:48pm) *

QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Fri 29th April 2011, 11:37pm) *

frivolity on frivolity

just wondering why he waited until now to say that.

When you say "he" do you mean me? If so then the answer is that I have so many calls on my time that sometimes I miss your stupidity, and it takes me a while to catch up.


Ah Malleus. I missed your favorite debate tactic: use name-calling to cover up your lack of clue.

I made a point which you failed to respond to, and instead you chose to yet again resort to name-calling rather than discuss something in a mature manner.

Fuck off with your maturity bollocks asshole.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Joy
post Mon 2nd May 2011, 4:40am
Post #96


I am a millipede! I am amazing!
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,839
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 2:25am
From: The Moon
Member No.: 982



QUOTE(Malleus @ Sun 1st May 2011, 11:18pm) *

QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Mon 2nd May 2011, 3:49am) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Fri 29th April 2011, 6:48pm) *

QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Fri 29th April 2011, 11:37pm) *

frivolity on frivolity

just wondering why he waited until now to say that.

When you say "he" do you mean me? If so then the answer is that I have so many calls on my time that sometimes I miss your stupidity, and it takes me a while to catch up.


Ah Malleus. I missed your favorite debate tactic: use name-calling to cover up your lack of clue.

I made a point which you failed to respond to, and instead you chose to yet again resort to name-calling rather than discuss something in a mature manner.

Fuck off with your maturity bollocks asshole.


Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Detective
post Tue 3rd May 2011, 8:52am
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu 9th Dec 2010, 11:17am
Member No.: 35,179



QUOTE(radek @ Sun 1st May 2011, 12:35am) *

"Too many admins" is in fact also under appreciated. It may not be true, but that's an empirical question. Logically, it's perfectly valid.

I suppose a better point would be "too many poor admins". I don't think there is an overabundance of good ones, and I hope that few people would object if there were. Wouldn't it be nice if the closing bureaucrat could say "Yes, I think this is a good admin candidate and to make room for him I've arranged a desysop of a rubbish admin".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
timbo
post Tue 3rd May 2011, 11:57pm
Post #98


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri 4th Jun 2010, 3:08am
Member No.: 21,141

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Sxeptomaniac: >>I never planned on even trying for adminship, but participating in RFAs for a while only made it clearer why that was a good choice. It's not really even the process, IMO. It's the mind-numbingly bureaucratic participants, the popularity-contest nature of the thing, and the blatantly myopic denials of the obvious: "It's not a vote" and "Adminship is no big deal" were frequently cited whenever it became too apparent that everyone believes the opposite.


You've got that right, mate. I'm a big believer in the Wikipedia project and a proud content-creator, but the Lord of the Flies Adminship process is unbelievably fucking junior high school. I've got no use for that crap.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Wed 4th May 2011, 12:07am
Post #99


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(melloden @ Sun 1st May 2011, 3:08pm) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Sun 1st May 2011, 5:15pm) *

QUOTE(chrisoff @ Sun 1st May 2011, 5:36pm) *

An average of 1.6 posts a day over three years is "rampant" for someone who spends 13 hours a day on wikipedia.

You're an malevolent idiot.


chrisoff, do you have a life? All you seem to do is throw petty insults at random people on WR.


Gentlemen, you can't fight in here...this is the War Room! dry.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Anonymous editor
post Fri 15th September 2017, 7:51pm
Post #100


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon 4th Aug 2008, 6:21pm
Member No.: 7,398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Malleus @ Sun 1st May 2011, 11:18pm) *

QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Mon 2nd May 2011, 3:49am) *

QUOTE(Malleus @ Fri 29th April 2011, 6:48pm) *

QUOTE(Anonymous editor @ Fri 29th April 2011, 11:37pm) *

frivolity on frivolity

just wondering why he waited until now to say that.

When you say "he" do you mean me? If so then the answer is that I have so many calls on my time that sometimes I miss your stupidity, and it takes me a while to catch up.


Ah Malleus. I missed your favorite debate tactic: use name-calling to cover up your lack of clue.

I made a point which you failed to respond to, and instead you chose to yet again resort to name-calling rather than discuss something in a mature manner.

Fuck off with your maturity bollocks asshole.




Thank you for proving my point. You are incapable of mature discussion and need to resort to childish insults so you can claim you "won". All that you've won is the title of Biggest Loser. Congratulations.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

5 Pages V « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 10 17, 1:56am