The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Return of the Scarlet Turd Burglar, ....hide your tp & don't spare a square
Piperdown
post Tue 12th February 2008, 3:02am
Post #1


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=190781870

QUOTE

:#Redirects "Turd burglar" to [[Gay]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Turd_burglar]. Speedy deleted and found to be "inappropriately mocking and derisive" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_22#Turd_burglar_.E2.86.92_Gay]

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Tue 26th February 2008, 3:19am
Post #2


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



QUOTE(Piperdown @ Tue 12th February 2008, 3:02am) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=190781870

QUOTE

:#Redirects "Turd burglar" to [[Gay]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Turd_burglar]. Speedy deleted and found to be "inappropriately mocking and derisive" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_22#Turd_burglar_.E2.86.92_Gay]




What would Alison Wheeler, David Shankbone, and other outstanding Wikipedians (although slightly self-aggrandizing) with diverse social backgrounds think about JzG's redirection of Turd Burglary? I shudder to think that any WP admins would actually stand up for what they believe is offensive to other admins.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Sun 28th September 2008, 6:45pm
Post #3


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



Turd Burglar has somehow found its way into here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminology_of_homosexuality

Huh?

A turd burglar isn't a sexual reference at all is it? Doesn't it refer to someone who accidentally bursts into someone else's occupied toilet room/stall? Homosexuality? Did someone try to apologise for JzG's mishomogyny gaff? Help me understand, all you unhip slangsters out there
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Sun 28th September 2008, 7:10pm
Post #4


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



QUOTE(Piperdown @ Sun 28th September 2008, 7:45pm) *

Turd Burglar has somehow found its way into here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminology_of_homosexuality

Huh?

A turd burglar isn't a sexual reference at all is it? Doesn't it refer to someone who accidentally bursts into someone else's occupied toilet room/stall? Homosexuality? Did someone try to apologise for JzG's mishomogyny gaff? Help me understand, all you unhip slangsters out there


It's listed under "Slang or pejorative terms". It's like a 'shirt lifter' i.e. a gay. Such as someone might accuse their mate of being if they were mocking them in an unpolitically correct manner. Hey, maybe JzG was drunk or bored that day.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Shalom
post Sun 28th September 2008, 7:13pm
Post #5


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 877
Joined: Tue 1st Apr 2008, 4:00pm
Member No.: 5,566

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Wait, are you telling me that JzG redirecting "Turd burglar" to "gay" was not complete nonsense? Serious question.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Sun 28th September 2008, 7:26pm
Post #6


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



QUOTE(Shalom @ Sun 28th September 2008, 8:13pm) *

Wait, are you telling me that JzG redirecting "Turd burglar" to "gay" was not complete nonsense? Serious question.


It gives the term a redirect it perhaps doesn't deserve, that redirect doesn't need to be in an encyclopedia, it was politically unwise of him to do as it's been used to associate him with the opinion; much as NPOVing a zoophilia article might be taken down and used in evidence against someone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alison
post Sun 28th September 2008, 7:32pm
Post #7


Skinny Cow!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,514
Joined: Tue 26th Jun 2007, 8:08pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 1,806



QUOTE(Shalom @ Sun 28th September 2008, 12:13pm) *

Wait, are you telling me that JzG redirecting "Turd burglar" to "gay" was not complete nonsense? Serious question.

Where I'm from, I've certainly heard the term being used to refer to a gay male. Think about it dry.gif As WW says, it's akin to 'shirtlifter'.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Sun 28th September 2008, 7:34pm
Post #8


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 28th September 2008, 8:32pm) *

QUOTE(Shalom @ Sun 28th September 2008, 12:13pm) *

Wait, are you telling me that JzG redirecting "Turd burglar" to "gay" was not complete nonsense? Serious question.

Where I'm from, I've certainly heard the term being used to refer to a gay male. Think about it dry.gif As WW says, it's akin to 'shirtlifter'.

Agreed. Certainly in London, it's one of the commonest slang terms for "gay male".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dogbiscuit
post Sun 28th September 2008, 7:39pm
Post #9


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 28th September 2008, 8:32pm) *

QUOTE(Shalom @ Sun 28th September 2008, 12:13pm) *

Wait, are you telling me that JzG redirecting "Turd burglar" to "gay" was not complete nonsense? Serious question.

Where I'm from, I've certainly heard the term being used to refer to a gay male. Think about it dry.gif As WW says, it's akin to 'shirtlifter'.

More akin to chutney ferret. (Thinks, not a path I should be going down really). I seem to recall, though, that it was not the redirect but the context, a bit like Guy claiming calling people c**ts was perfectly acceptable English behaviour (plenty of women here still find the term really offensive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Random832
post Sun 28th September 2008, 7:43pm
Post #10


meh
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,933
Joined: Thu 14th Feb 2008, 8:52pm
Member No.: 4,844

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Also - in context, JzG was just trying to protect the title from a series of silly articles that had been created at that title.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Sun 28th September 2008, 8:03pm
Post #11


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



QUOTE(Random832 @ Sun 28th September 2008, 7:43pm) *

Also - in context, JzG was just trying to protect the title from a series of silly articles that had been created at that title.


um, wrong answer. there's other ways to protect a title. I wonder what JzG's opinions on "gay" men is. Re-directing turd burglar to gay is not very nice, to say the least.

that redirect would be akin to "nappy headed ho's" being redirected to that ladies basketball team's article that was involved in the Don Imus scandal.

Or let's say, "coon" or "jigaboo" being redirected to "Negro". Pitchforks and torches would run off any editor who did such a thing. If it was redirected to a subsection or stub on the properly referenced sources of insulting names, that's a different story.

If it was redirect to section of "insulting names for homosexuals" and not just "gay", that would be different. I think "gay" is socially acceptable and relatively positive to all walks of life. Although many straight old-timers who like to refer to good times as "gay" are still not happy about its adoption by the homosexual community I've heard.

That redirect implies that turd burglar is an acceptable and definite synonym for "gay". I'd imagine to someone that's gay, it's horribly offensive to present it that way.

If I were to enter "coon" in wikipedia and it brought up the Negro article, that would be terrible.

Isnt' JzG an ultra-macho kickass Church Deacon? I'd wager he doesn't approve of gay at all, and that redirect was done with malice.

QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Sun 28th September 2008, 7:39pm) *

a bit like Guy claiming calling people c**ts was perfectly acceptable English behaviour (plenty of women here still find the term really offensive.


its funny ain't it? all these uberrighteous lady admins like slimmy feigning offences, while davy and jzg go round using the most offensive word that exists to most women i've known. maybe those women aren't from his pub and just aren't culturally hip to whats acceptable these days.

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Sun 28th September 2008, 8:04pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sun 28th September 2008, 8:24pm
Post #12


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Piperdown @ Sun 28th September 2008, 11:45am) *

Turd Burglar has somehow found its way into here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminology_of_homosexuality

Huh?

A turd burglar isn't a sexual reference at all is it? Doesn't it refer to someone who accidentally bursts into someone else's occupied toilet room/stall? Homosexuality? Did someone try to apologise for JzG's mishomogyny gaff? Help me understand, all you unhip slangsters out there

I believe "turd burglar" was in that list long before JzG's "gaff." Which wasn't so much a gaff at all, as it is a slang term, especially in the UK. And I pointed out at the time, his big mistake was redirecting it to "Gay" and not the proper "Terminology of homosexuality." Nobody paid me any attention. Anyway, the slang is something along the joke line of "Can I push in your stool for you?" ohmy.gif How offensive it is, depends on who says it and if they smile when they say it, like faggot and bugger and so on and so on. And the N word, too. Many insults are situation-dependent.

But I'm pretty sure "mishomogyny" isn't a word, unless it refers to dislike of lebians.

This post has been edited by Milton Roe: Sun 28th September 2008, 8:28pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Shalom
post Sun 28th September 2008, 8:35pm
Post #13


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 877
Joined: Tue 1st Apr 2008, 4:00pm
Member No.: 5,566

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Some redirects are little more than in-jokes. My favorite was "Wikipedia is communism" --> Wikipedia. Prodego nominated with a simple statement: "Come on...". I thought it was funny enough to immortalize in my userspace BJAODN before I deleted it...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Meringue
post Mon 29th September 2008, 10:08am
Post #14


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu 11th Sep 2008, 3:59pm
Member No.: 8,209



QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Sun 28th September 2008, 8:39pm) *

More akin to chutney ferret. (Thinks, not a path I should be going down really). I seem to recall, though, that it was not the redirect but the context, a bit like Guy claiming calling people c**ts was perfectly acceptable English behaviour (plenty of women here still find the term really offensive.

It most indubitably is not acceptable in most parts of England. Where does this Guy hang out? What does he hang out?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
House of Cards
post Mon 29th September 2008, 10:24am
Post #15


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon 12th May 2008, 6:51pm
From: Neither here nor there
Member No.: 6,114



QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 28th September 2008, 9:32pm) *

QUOTE(Shalom @ Sun 28th September 2008, 12:13pm) *

Wait, are you telling me that JzG redirecting "Turd burglar" to "gay" was not complete nonsense? Serious question.

Where I'm from, I've certainly heard the term being used to refer to a gay male. Think about it dry.gif As WW says, it's akin to 'shirtlifter'.

Very common in Aussie slang, too. But is it entierly necessary to redirect it to [[Gay]]? [[Homophobia]] may have been more appropriate.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
the fieryangel
post Mon 29th September 2008, 12:24pm
Post #16


the Internet Review Corporation is watching you...
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,990
Joined: Tue 21st Nov 2006, 9:49pm
From: It's all in your mind anyway...
Member No.: 577



Here's what's left of the original evidence.

The page move was protected as being "obvious". I was sure that there are many other "obvious" terms which should be redirected to "gay", "arab", "Catholic", "Italian" etc and it would seem that WP editors felt the same way that I did.

I don't think that JzG is an ultra-macho Church deacon type, since he sings in the choir....I mean, in the first, non-slang, sense of that term, anyway....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Random832
post Mon 29th September 2008, 12:37pm
Post #17


meh
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,933
Joined: Thu 14th Feb 2008, 8:52pm
Member No.: 4,844

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Mon 29th September 2008, 12:24pm) *

Here's what's left of the original evidence.

The page move was protected as being "obvious".


I read that as being "it's obvious why it's protected" (i.e. "because people keep making nonsense articles at the title"), not "the term is an obvious synonym".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
the fieryangel
post Mon 29th September 2008, 1:53pm
Post #18


the Internet Review Corporation is watching you...
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,990
Joined: Tue 21st Nov 2006, 9:49pm
From: It's all in your mind anyway...
Member No.: 577



QUOTE(Random832 @ Mon 29th September 2008, 12:37pm) *

QUOTE(the fieryangel @ Mon 29th September 2008, 12:24pm) *

Here's what's left of the original evidence.

The page move was protected as being "obvious".


I read that as being "it's obvious why it's protected" (i.e. "because people keep making nonsense articles at the title"), not "the term is an obvious synonym".


Many things were obvious in that discussion, which is why the entire thing got over-sighted. It was just too embarrassing for all....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Mon 29th September 2008, 4:14pm
Post #19


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



The page doesn't include 'chutney ferret'. Nor 'pilot of the chocolate runway'. Otherwise useful and informative stuff, as always.

[edit] Sorry, [/irony].

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Mon 29th September 2008, 4:15pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Mon 29th September 2008, 4:54pm
Post #20


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 29th September 2008, 12:14pm) *

The page doesn't include 'chutney ferret'. Nor 'pilot of the chocolate runway'. Otherwise useful and informative stuff, as always.

[edit] Sorry, [/irony].


Was that irony or sarcasm?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 5 13, 8:29am