Posted by: thekohser
Despite Jimbo Wales' best efforts to personally stamp out the child porn on Wikimedia Commons, the problem seems to persist, according to http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikimedia-commons-cannot-control-teen-pornography.
Nonetheless, the guy seems to write a damn good article that's worth sending to the FBI.
Posted by: TungstenCarbide
QUOTE(thekohser @ Sat 30th October 2010, 10:36pm)
Despite Jimbo Wales' best efforts to personally stamp out the child porn on Wikimedia Commons, the problem seems to persist, according to http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikimedia-commons-cannot-control-teen-pornography.
Nonetheless, the guy seems to write a damn good article that's worth sending to the FBI.
I tried to leave a comment at the article but the spam filter stopped it. The comment was;
QUOTE
By Tungsten Carbide
The Wikipedia culture is one that prides itself on being open minded and un-censored. Objectionable images at Wikipedia get an automatic protection under the banner of "anti-censorship", which has led to thousands of images of porn residing on Wikipedia servers with negligible editorial value. In fact, anyone endeavoring to exercise editorial judgment by deleting surplus porn will fail. Just ask Jimbo Wales;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=Jimbo+Wales&page=&year=2010&month=5&tagfilter=
(The red links are porn images he deleted, the blue links are his deletions that have been reversed, because those images are so vital, apparently.)
Wikipedians think censorship is evil when it comes to deleting porn, but they absolutely love it when it's used to silence critics, like this article's author who's been banned from Wikipedia's mailing lists and chatrooms;
http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikimedia-foundation-director-admits-to-sweetheart-contracts
Show me an image of a man sucking his own wiener and I'll show you a hundred frothing at the mouth wikipedians smacking their fists on the table, demanding that it be used to illustrate an article. (warning, not safe for work; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofellatio )
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
On one hand you have spread open, shaved teen vagina; on the other hand, you him posting pictures of some fat, middle aged man's hairy gut, legs and ball bag.
That's the Wikipedia for you.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(TungstenCarbide @ Sat 30th October 2010, 7:35pm)
I tried to leave a comment at the article but the spam filter stopped it.
The Examiner site let someone register the name "Anonymous" —
???
Jon