FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
[[Essjay controversy]] up for Featured Article -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> [[Essjay controversy]] up for Featured Article, Hold the main page!
Firsfron of Ronchester
post
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 442
Joined:
From: , Location, Location.
Member No.: 1,715
Essjay controversy has been nominated for Featured Article, articles which are supposed to represent the best of Wikipedia. Featured Articles may appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. Is this navel gazing? Or is it important for Wikipedia to air its own dirty laundry on its front page?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
guy
post
Post #2


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined:
From: London
Member No.: 23
Articles on the front page always get floods of edits of course. Can you imagine what would happen to that article?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Firsfron of Ronchester   [[Essjay controversy]] up for Featured Article  
Jonny Cache   [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essjay_controve...  
Kato   The nomination is priceless :lol: I have a feel...  
blissyu2   Bizarre. Much as it might be fun to have that on ...  
grievous   Bizarre. Much as it might be fun to have that on...  
Pwok   I wouldn't be surprised if it went on their fr...  
Jonny Cache   Articles on the front page always get floods of e...  
everyking   FAs aren't just about going on the front page,...  
Jonny Cache   FAs aren't just about going on the front page...  
Firsfron of Ronchester   FAs aren't just about going on the front page...  
alienus   Wiki-censored, not wiki-centric. I think even th...  
Firsfron of Ronchester   [u]Wiki-censored, not wiki-centric. Uhm, the bad...  
Pwok   The title may be a whitewash, but (groan) at least...  
JoseClutch   The title may be a whitewash, but (groan) at leas...  
Jonny Cache   [quote name='Firsfron of Ronchester' post='47767...  
Yehudi   In ordinary usage, being a professional means you...  
Jonny Cache   In ordinary usage, being a professional means yo...  
Pwok   I'm not sure this is a good description of pro...  
Firsfron of Ronchester   Leaving aside the subject/object disagreement in...  
Pwok   Are we talking about all instances or in most case...  
Jaranda   Of course he'll never put that in the main pag...  
jdrand   The reason why WJBscribe voted oppose is not becau...  
Pwok   WJBscribe voted "no" because he was one ...  
LamontStormstar   WJBscribe voted "no" because he was one...  
Pwok   I never looked at the whole Malber story but I rem...  
Unrepentant Vandal   So this is what it's come to: the most popular...  
LamontStormstar   So this is what it's come to: the most popular...  
the fieryangel   If that picture is gone it's a hot nude chick...  
Rochelle   There's no way it's going to pass. In fact...  
blissyu2   WJBscribe helped to ban Malber. He is a good guy.  
Pwok   He's a good guy. That speaks volumes: it tells...  
Unrepentant Vandal   He doesn't belong in a position of responsibi...  
Pwok   Luckily, Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia. They ma...  
Unrepentant Vandal   Luckily, Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia. They m...  
Pwok   Look, I don't believe the claim either. The fa...  
blissyu2   Yes, apparently Malber wrote what happened in Harr...  

 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)