FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Jill Meagher -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

> Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Jill Meagher
Brutus
post
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 96
Joined:
Member No.: 3,898



Wikipedia is full of bios of "not notable" people on Wikipedia.

I find some of editors comments on Wikipedia a bit inappropriate seeing the unfortunate girl is still warm in her grave.

Articles for deletion - Jill Meagher

News article
The Age Newspaper (AU) -Murder victim Meagher may be wiped from Wikipedia

Bios of "not notable" people survive because
1. many editors don't care and couldn't be bothered getting these articles deleted.
2. the article is keep alive by a small group of seasoned editors (occasionally the odd admin) usually connected in some way to that person, who know the Wikipedia "system" well enough to play the "system" to enable the article to survive.

From Australia here's typical example of the later.
Daniel Bowen



User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Detective
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 35,179



Ottava, please get off this thread. The adults are trying to have a serious discussion, and your repeated assertions that you do not speak English very well are disruptive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post
Post #3


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



QUOTE(Poetlister @ Tue 29th January 2013, 7:33am) *

Ottava, please get off this thread. The adults are trying to have a serious discussion, and your repeated assertions that you do not speak English very well are disruptive.


Having a discussion with your other socks is not a discussion.

This post has been edited by Ottava:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Detective
post
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined:
Member No.: 35,179



QUOTE(Ottava @ Tue 29th January 2013, 11:37pm) *

Having a discussion with your other socks is not a discussion.

This is beyond ridiculous! Now Brutus is also my sock. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)