 User Sigma1986 at Commons, Uploading illegal material and still at large |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Text |
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Contributors Posts: 491 Joined: Member No.: 15,107  |
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Sigma1986
The first files he uploaded were images of underage femalia genitalia, however the account was never blocked. In fact, some of his images managed to slip through some foreign language Wikipedias in the relevant pages about female anatomy, and remained there for some time before being detected. After they were deleted, the files were re-uploaded. By reading between the lines it seems that the account belongs to a now over-18 woman who took the pictures herself while she was young; or a boyfriend who took pictures of the girlfriend. In theory. In reality, it could just be yet another fake. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Text |
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Contributors Posts: 491 Joined: Member No.: 15,107 |
QUOTE But because of the way the world is now, partly due to prudery, partly due to knee-jerk reactions, partly due to media incitement and partly due to the sick demands of paedophiles this beautiful picture is now deemed to be "child porn". If you were the father of the three kids and saw the pic on a site where everyone can download it, would you be fine with it? |
|
|
|
| Web Fred |
Post
#3
|
|
Pervert & Swinger Group: Contributors Posts: 739 Joined: From: Manchester, UK Member No.: 17,141 |
QUOTE(Text @ Mon 16th April 2012, 10:17pm)  QUOTE But because of the way the world is now, partly due to prudery, partly due to knee-jerk reactions, partly due to media incitement and partly due to the sick demands of paedophiles this beautiful picture is now deemed to be "child porn". If you were the father of the three kids and saw the pic on a site where everyone can download it, would you be fine with it? Probably. I think that's a gorgeous image. The looks on the kids' faces is pure innocence, the fact they are nude is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. Unfortunately I don't have any images of my kids that are as nice as that one. In any case, I'm probably the wrong person to ask. I'm an ex-swinger and ex-naturist, with my kids having grown up in the culture of the latter. I also don't concern myself with what sick fucks do in their bedrooms with pictures of kids. |
|
|
|
| Proabivouac |
Post
#4
|
|
Bane of all wikiland Group: Contributors Posts: 2,246 Joined: Member No.: 2,647 |
QUOTE(Web Fred @ Mon 16th April 2012, 9:42pm) In any case, I'm probably the wrong person to ask. I'm an ex-swinger and ex-naturist, with my kids having grown up in the culture of the latter. And your custom description reads "Pervert & Swinger." You were the one with a shaved vulva on your en.wp userpage, no? Do you not see a continuum between your own behavior and that of Benjiboi or Fæ? Asked another way, were Wikimedia projects legitimate scholarly endeavors, shouldn't someone in authority have taken one look at any of this and said, "wtf, no?" |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Text User Sigma1986 at Commons 
Web Fred
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Sig... Text
I haven't seen them, but the user specified ... Text http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...svilu... 
Web Fred
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...svil... Detective
perhaps there are worse places to put them than C... Web Fred
perhaps there are worse places to put them than ... Text
As long as nobody sees the picture, or doesn... |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |