The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Back so soon?
Jagärdu
post Sun 16th October 2011, 10:23pm
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri 25th Jun 2010, 3:20am
Member No.: 22,114



I wonder who this "new" editor is? Well I don't actually, I have my mind made up but anyone else want to guess?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Mon 17th October 2011, 5:09pm
Post #2


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Jagärdu @ Sun 16th October 2011, 3:23pm) *

I wonder who this "new" editor is? Well I don't actually, I have my mind made up but anyone else want to guess?

I think QuackGuru (T-C-L-K-R-D) . Has that special kind of wingnut alternative medicine mania.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=306774963
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jagärdu
post Wed 19th October 2011, 5:59pm
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri 25th Jun 2010, 3:20am
Member No.: 22,114



QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Mon 17th October 2011, 5:09pm) *

QUOTE(Jagärdu @ Sun 16th October 2011, 3:23pm) *

I wonder who this "new" editor is? Well I don't actually, I have my mind made up but anyone else want to guess?

I think QuackGuru (T-C-L-K-R-D) . Has that special kind of wingnut alternative medicine mania.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=306774963


Yes but I always thought Quackguru had a particularly unique problem with normal social interaction. this person seems way too normal to be Quackguru, in my humble opinion. Guess again?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jagärdu
post Fri 28th October 2011, 3:39pm
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri 25th Jun 2010, 3:20am
Member No.: 22,114



Now this is amusing. This obvious sock of a banned science crusader is reporting WMC for breaking his topic ban, because he doesn't like that WMC disagrees with him about the entry he's been trying so desperately to delete.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
It's the blimp, Frank
post Fri 28th October 2011, 4:59pm
Post #5


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 3:54pm
Member No.: 82



QUOTE(Jagärdu @ Fri 28th October 2011, 3:39pm) *

Now this is amusing. This obvious sock of a banned science crusader is reporting WMC for breaking his topic ban, because he doesn't like that WMC disagrees with him about the entry he's been trying so desperately to delete.

WMC is one of Wikipedia's most famed POV pushers, and he should be firmly encouraged to get the hell out of Dodge, no matter how innocent his initial edits may be. Also, Raul654 is one of Wikipedia's most famed morons, so I will want to be disagreeing with him here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Detective
post Sat 29th October 2011, 7:33pm
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu 9th Dec 2010, 11:17am
Member No.: 35,179



QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Fri 28th October 2011, 5:59pm) *

Also, Raul654 is one of Wikipedia's most famed morons

A top Cabalist, yes. Very irritating, yes. But a moron? No, and that's what makes him dangerous. He wouldn't have the grip on power he does if he were a moron.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 8 17, 6:03am