The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Keith Raniere, Super Executive Coach or Cult Leader, take your pick!
milowent
post Sat 18th June 2011, 2:02am
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed 12th May 2010, 12:55am
Member No.: 20,085

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



i haven't fulled digested what the disputes going on regarding Keith Raniere and his cult-organization NXIVM are all about, but the talk pages are littered with the debates of non-regular wiki editors all with either (1) an axe to grind against this apparent upstate New York cult and its weirdo leader, or (2) likely cult members trying to insert stuff about him having the the highest IQ in the world (no joke) and being a teen judo champion. Crazy stuff.

A number of exposes have been written about Raniere in mainstream news organizations, e.g., New York Observer (2010) and a 2003 front cover story in Forbes among others, but they seem to get deleted and refactored out and then put back in, etc.

This post has been edited by milowent: Sat 18th June 2011, 2:03am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Sun 19th June 2011, 11:42pm
Post #2


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Cults (and generally, minority religions) are poorly and inconsistently handled by Wikipedia.

I will quote my comments from a thread in the "private area":
QUOTE
Ever looked closely at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (T-H-L-K-D)? Lengthy, detailed, one of the oldest articles on en-wiki, and obviously being "sanctified" by church members. At the present time, that would include Richwales (T-C-L-K-R-D) , Eustress (T-C-L-K-R-D) , and a few others. As time dribbles by, the "Controversies" section expands and contracts.

Similar things happen to Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (T-H-L-K-D), but it doesn't enjoy quite the golden showers of righteousness that the primary Mormon church articles do. Folks like ARTEST4ECHO (T-C-L-K-R-D) and a few IP addresses "expand" the article to make it more "wikiality-ish", yet others reinsert the group's "legal problems". rolleyes.gif

Similar things happen to the articles about other Mormon sects listed here. No doubt because those groups tend to be "technology-ignorant".

Similar for the Unification Church, which counts an early Wikipedian (Ed Poor) as a member.


There's lots more, but I'll let you find it. Start here.
The presence of rabid anti-cult nerds on en-WP, like Will Beback and Cirt, doesn't help. I would have to say that the cult coverage is generally very poor in quality, and frequently biased.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 5 17, 11:18pm