David Shankbone, goat piss and more kiddie porn?, The Urination topic ... Options

[Cock-up-over-conspiracy]

Hmmn ... as usual, underlines are links.

Elsewhere, I recent tripped and fell over gobsmacked by David "Shankbone" Miller and the very real ... rather than 'virtual' and 'Wiki' ... Zionist Kabal at work on the Wikipedia; posting images of Palestinian kids playing with guns and ridiculously NPOV titles about how traumatized Jews were by this.

I appreciate that for some of you he is 'old news' and I am not up to speed on the shitstory but looking today, for god knows what reason at the Urination topic, I came over him again (um ... no ... not "literally" but ... well ... 'literally' speaking) posting pictures of urinating goats taking on 'organic Israeli farms'. No doubt more fruit of those press junkets thrown his way as a "leading wikipedia editor" by the Israeli consulate in New York, and other Zionist organizations.

But ... excuse me ... are these two other pictures on the Wikipedia topic on urination not bordering on pedophilia?

Am I the only one that finds a picture of a young girl pissing in the street, given that she is obviously irritated by the intrusion, "foreign" (and perhaps in a developing nation) a little bit exploitative ... especially framed by a drawing of a gaping vagina and not one but two animal pissing pictures?

For example; a young girl pressing her crotch Need to pee and, from the Wikimedia ...

-- *** THESE IMAGES HAVE NOW BEEN REMOVED FROM THE WIKIPEDIA THANKS TO 'wikipediareview.com' CONTRIBUTORS. REPORTERS OR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS PLEASE CONTACT FOR DETAILS.

I see from the history that Shankbone also posted one of his pornographic offerings, "Female Urination with Urethra clearly visible.jpg" and was willing to get into an edit war over it.

Interestingly, "I read that the 'nom de plume' Shankbone" most certainly did have the intent of gay porn splashed all over its face when he thought about it but ... the big joke is ...

The Israelis he met on his press junket thought it was Jewish, a reference to the beef shank bone used in Passover seders.

Although Miller has managed interviews with a few high-profile subjects like Peres, he’s relatively unknown outside the Wiki community. Some of his pieces have page views in the single digits.

Miller told me he usually doesn’t do much research on his subjects ... Sometimes he’ll just read his subject’s Wikipedia profile to prepare. Still, he says, “I try to come off as someone completely knowledgeable.” In person, Miller possesses the self-assurance of a prosecutor and the practiced nonchalance of an arriviste. He dropped names as though he had a tick ...

My goodness ... perfect qualifications! The Shanker then went on to defend it on the basis that

because I'm gay, but I have never understood how girls pee, and this photo (... I took ...) just completely demystified it for me ... well into my twenties I thought girls peed out of their butts because they sat down.

Which all makes me have to ask, what exactly is the moneyshot that the Zionist ... (cough, I am sorry) ... the Government of Israeli think it is getting from the Wikpedia? How much did they donate for this? (Especially since I presume the junkets are all "business class"). The article linked to reads as if David flunked out of law school because he defaulted on credit card payments and could not get any more loans. Wikinews is reported as "employing" 25 journalists.

So ... anyway, before I make any more enemies ... going back to the golden showers and farmyard action, visually, what exactly is the article trying to say and is this aceptable?

Would you want a picture of your child pissing on the internet with a Creative Common's License?

Did the Wikipedia Foundation ensured the minor's parents signed a release form for its use?

Or do they just not give a shit because no kid from a developing nation is going to be able to afford to sue them at a later date?

I'd be interested to know who else user "Cathyw2" is ... or if they paid for it and got a hand job off the kid later?

This post has been edited by Cock-up-over-conspiracy: Wed 20th May 2009, 5:21pm

[A Horse With No Name]

That's David Shankbone...he brings out the best in us.

[Alison]

[snip]

Am I the only one that finds a picture of a young girl pissing in the street, given that she is obviously irritated by the intrusion, "foreign" (and perhaps in a developing nation) a little bit exploitative ... especially framed by a drawing of a gaping vagina and not one but two animal pissing pictures?

For example; a young girl pressing her crotch Need to pee and, from the Wikimedia ...



I see from the history that Shankbone also posted one of his pornographic offerings, "Female Urination with Urethra clearly visible.jpg" and was willing to get into an edit war over it.

[snip]

I'm not too happy with either of those pictures as they're an apparent invasion of a child's privacy and it appears that the subjects are unaware or displeased. I've marked them both {{Personality rights}} on Commons - it's the best I can do.

BTW, is it just me, or is that 'urination' article biased in a somewhat voyeuristic way towards specifically female urination? It sure looks like that to me

Oh, and BTW - the pic that Shankers was edit-warring over wasn't one of his. Ironically, it was a (now-deleted) copyvio from Commons

[dtobias]

The encyclopedia of urination: Wiki-PEE-dia!

----------------
Now playing: Diane Birch - Rise Up
via FoxyTunes

[The Joy]

That's David Shankbone...he brings out the best in us.

He brings out the lunch in me!

[Somey]

Let's be realistic about this, folks. I mean, it's ridiculous to think Wikipedia, the world's biggest encyclopedia-like website thingy, shouldn't have a fully-realized article about urination. Everybody does it, and if you don't do it, you get filled up with nasty urine and die, so it's important that people know how to do it, and preferably where, but y'know, you've got to learn to crawl before you can walk, right? So I'd say having the goat and the little girl on the sidewalk is a good start. Maybe in a few months, or a year or two, they can work their way up to people in bathrooms. In the meantime, let's just cut them a little slack.

Then again, maybe it should just stay the way it is - after all, you can't have regular middle-class Americans urinating in the pages of Wikipedia, can you? That would just be too creepy. Appropriate, and well-deserved, sure. But you've got to draw the line somewhere.

At least they don't mention asparagus anywhere in the article. That would be a little "over the top," I think.

[Alison]

At least they don't mention asparagus anywhere in the article. That would be a little "over the top," I think.

Of course not!! For that, you need asparagus pee

EDIT: Then there's the "Exquisite sample of urine produced after a long game of chess" Nothing like having your own pee achieve infamy via Wikipedia

[Somey]

Well, apparently I posted all that stuff earlier without having seen this. I think we have to assume that's a photo of Dave's own personal contribution to the Denver sewage-treatment system, so it's probably written up on his resumé by now.

Somebody had to do it, I guess...

[Alison]

Well, apparently I posted all that stuff earlier without having seen this. I think we have to assume that's a photo of Dave's own personal contribution to the Denver sewage-treatment system, so it's probably written up on his resumé by now.

Somebody had to do it, I guess...

Oh gawdz NO!!!! David Shankbone's piss on Wikipedia.

[Milton Roe]

At least they don't mention asparagus anywhere in the article. That would be a little "over the top," I think.

Of course not!! For that, you need asparagus pee

EDIT: Then there's the "Exquisite sample of urine produced after a long game of chess" Nothing like having your own pee achieve infamy via Wikipedia

That's a pretty standard skirted medical collection container, generally 25 mL. Why it took a long game of chess for somebody to produce a couple tablespoons of urine...

It's not clear to me if user:EPO is the photographer. He's a pretty good photographer, actually, with no hint of kinkiness.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:EPO/Gallery

Unlike some photographers at WP I could mention....

And urine, BTW (as I can tell you from one of my M. Roe Dirty Jobs), almost always looks worse than this sample. As pee goes, this one is a claret.

[victim of censorship]

More proof that Wikipedia and it's scum admins are the
blight of the internet.

PS... Shankbone is a piece of filth and if he lived around where
I live, Mr Porno would be in Jail.



This post has been edited by victim of censorship: Wed 20th May 2009, 8:55am

[Viridae]

That's a pretty standard skirted medical collection container, generally 25 mL. Why it took a long game of chess for somebody to produce a couple tablespoons of urine...

I was thinking the same thing actually.

More proof that Wikipedia and it's scum admins are the
blight of the internet.

PS... Shankbone is a piece of filth and if he lived around where
I live, Mr Porno would be in Jail.

He isn't an admin. (thank god)

[Milton Roe]

Well, apparently I posted all that stuff earlier without having seen this. I think we have to assume that's a photo of Dave's own personal contribution to the Denver sewage-treatment system, so it's probably written up on his resumé by now.

Somebody had to do it, I guess...

Oh gawdz NO!!!! David Shankbone's piss on Wikipedia.

See? I told you it was invariably worse than the nice sample you pointed to, before.

[thekohser]

If only Wikipedia would wise up and allow YouTube embeds, then they could (and should) include a video showcasing how Chris Christmas Rodriguez urinates:





(For the entire series of Chris Christmas Rodriguez videos, visit here.)

[dtobias]

On The Amazing Race, Kisha and Jen lost the race and the chance at a million dollars because Jen had to stop to pee. Some interesting urination trivia that probably isn't in the WP article.

[Cock-up-over-conspiracy]

Thanks for flagging the image of the little girl urinating (what did you make of the other one tugging her crotch, as kids do, but in that context?). And thanks the rest of you for the cynicism.

Yes, you are right. It was only the goat pissing on the Pee-dia that was David Miller's photograph.

But its OK ... It was an organic and a Jewish goat, thereby cleverly appealing to both the liberals and the Zionist Kabal, and photographed at the expense of the Israeli Consultate of New York. Its inclusion is surely ensured.

Yes, of course, the Pee-dia should have an article on urination (see my fruity and recently updated signature) ... but why stop there? We could have Urination ... Jewish Urination ... Gay Urination ... Japanese Urination ... Koreans urinating on Japanese ... a List of the Greatest Urination Takers in history, and so on. Indeed, I should be congratulating them for their modesty.

My point is, whilst they are willing to sit they are edit war over a picture of an adult Caucasian female peeing with her urethra in full view, and 10,000 other futilities, an extremely invasive image of a hald dressed Asian child being photographed by an adult remains unchallenged. Its abot the cultural values that are being displayed, along with the buttocks and crotch shots.

I initially entered this forum at the point of exiting the Pee-dia over the futility of attempting to raise the issue of cultural, or racist, bias. From what I can see, its only getting worse. "As is the king, so is the kingdom".



Leading Wikipedian Farmyard Piss Action
& Piss Art Pornographer David Shankbone

This post has been edited by Cock-up-over-conspiracy: Wed 20th May 2009, 2:41pm

[TungstenCarbide]

I'm not too happy with either of those pictures as they're an apparent invasion of a child's privacy and it appears that the subjects are unaware or displeased. I've marked them both {{Personality rights}} on Commons - it's the best I can do...

it's the best I can do

Coward.

This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide: Wed 20th May 2009, 3:31pm

[Alison]

I'm not too happy with either of those pictures as they're an apparent invasion of a child's privacy and it appears that the subjects are unaware or displeased. I've marked them both {{Personality rights}} on Commons - it's the best I can do...

Coward.

Why?

What do you think will happen if I try to delete them from Commons (I still have my sysop bit there)? Seriously - what exactly would be achieved? I've no intentions of going back to serious editing on WP and getting my bit back on there is utterly out of the question.

Serious question: what's the best tactic for dealing with pictures that people deem offensive?

[dtobias]

I'm a nation, you're a nation, we're all a nation for urination!

[TungstenCarbide]

I'm not too happy with either of those pictures as they're an apparent invasion of a child's privacy and it appears that the subjects are unaware or displeased. I've marked them both {{Personality rights}} on Commons - it's the best I can do...

Coward.

Why?

because you said that tagging the image was 'it's the best I can do'. Bullshit. what if that was your daughter in the photograph, plastered on the worlds largest reference website. And you complained to an administrator and they said 'it's the best I can do' but didn't take it down?

What do you think will happen if I try to delete them from Commons (I still have my sysop bit there)? Seriously - what exactly would be achieved? I've no intentions of going back to serious editing on WP and getting my bit back on there is utterly out of the question.

Serious question: what's the best tactic for dealing with pictures that people deem offensive?

Offensive? you just don't get it, Alison. This is a human being and someone's child.

Hell, even a banned editor can do better than you.

This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide: Wed 20th May 2009, 3:45pm