|
|
|
Ktr101 RfA - 4th time the charm?, Or will NW nuke him? |
|
|
Milton Roe |
|
Known alias of J. Random Troll
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined:
Member No.: 5,156
|
QUOTE(Theanima @ Mon 31st May 2010, 7:07pm) Can this thread be tarpitted? Dumbass dogbiscuit is posting personal information that was probably intended to be private.
QUOTE Data Processor Hyannis, Massachusetts I enter in 50 resumes a day and scan stuff. I also have newfound internet sleuthing skills. Us, too! (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/laugh.gif) If you don't want everyone in the universe to know it about you, don't put it on the internet.
|
|
|
|
ulsterman |
|
Senior Member
Group: Inactive
Posts: 296
Joined:
Member No.: 19,575
|
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Tue 1st June 2010, 1:24am) To quote the Chairman of the Board - just what makes that little ol' ant think he can move a rubber tree plant? Everyone knows an ant...can't...move a rubber tree plant. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/ermm.gif) But whatever high hopes he had seem to have been kneecap whacked by our favorite NW, leading the Oppose charge. Plus, there is a vague acknowledgment by the candidate of a "a copyright problem at an article I created" -- hmmm, that may explain why an Arbcom member nominated him for adminship! (Arbcom to community: send more plagiarists!) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/blink.gif) By the way, Ktr101 is also on Facebook. The kid needs to spend more quality time at Popeye's Fried Chicken! (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) Interesting range of opposers. Where else will you see agreement between Sarah, our own Abd, NW and Cirt? Sarah is one of the best admins going and not to be confused with other admins who may or may not have a similar name. I doubt that I need comment on the others!
|
|
|
|
Rick |
|
Junior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 54
Joined:
Member No.: 19,401
|
I thought this bloke was already an admin? QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Fri 23rd April 2010, 11:19pm) QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Fri 23rd April 2010, 4:52am) QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Thu 22nd April 2010, 6:29pm) QUOTE(Rick @ Fri 23rd April 2010, 1:03am) Tiptoety is one of my least favourite admins..... http://concordiapdx.org/wp-content/uploads.../09_9-cnews.pdfHe's in the photo on the right on the first page, and he's the one wearing glasses. These are Portland Police Cadets ... is he second on the right named as Tyler Van Wormer, or Nathan Hepp with the shades on his head? Tyler Van Wormer. Yes, I think that backstabbing little twat definitely belongs on Hivemind. Damn...Tyler looks like he was separated at birth by another of the too-eager teenager admins, young master Kevin Rutherford, aka Ktr101. Check out his inane grinning mug shot on Facebook. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/wacko.gif) To quote Paul Lynde from "Bye Bye Birdie" - what's the matter with kids today? (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/rolleyes.gif) (emphasis on the "teenager admins" part mine) This post has been edited by Rick:
|
|
|
|
A Horse With No Name |
|
I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined:
Member No.: 9,985
|
QUOTE(ulsterman @ Tue 1st June 2010, 8:03am) Interesting range of opposers. Where else will you see agreement between Sarah, our own Abd, NW and Cirt? Sarah is one of the best admins going and not to be confused with other admins who may or may not have a similar name. I doubt that I need comment on the others!
I can't agree about Sarah -- I've found her to be vindictive and, sadly, rather stupid -- and Cirt has no credibility. But kudos to Abd, who pretty much nailed the coffin in a precise and clearly-defined manner. At this point, the Good Ship Rutherford has taken on too much water. If the kid was smart, he'd get off while he can and come back next year. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/ermm.gif)
|
|
|
|
Theanima |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 222
Joined:
Member No.: 18,566
|
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 1st June 2010, 8:37am) QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:07am) Can this thread be tarpitted? Dumbass dogbiscuit is posting personal information that was probably intended to be private.
I have no Facebook relationship with this person. I blanked the email addresses. I felt the sheer quantity of publicly available information was noteworthy. I do note that his birthdate is in there, so I'll happily blank that, there was so much information up there I didn't spot it. If it wasn't intentional that he published it, then is the sort of person you want administrating Wikipedia, obviously someone of sound judgement. That's strange, I don't recall wanting him to become an admin. Of course, you know me better than I do.
|
|
|
|
dogbiscuit |
|
Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined:
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015
|
QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:54pm) QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 1st June 2010, 8:37am) QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:07am) Can this thread be tarpitted? Dumbass dogbiscuit is posting personal information that was probably intended to be private.
I have no Facebook relationship with this person. I blanked the email addresses. I felt the sheer quantity of publicly available information was noteworthy. I do note that his birthdate is in there, so I'll happily blank that, there was so much information up there I didn't spot it. If it wasn't intentional that he published it, then is the sort of person you want administrating Wikipedia, obviously someone of sound judgement. That's strange, I don't recall wanting him to become an admin. Of course, you know me better than I do. <sigh> Typos excepted, I would hope that those people who like to go around throwing casual insults would at least have the understanding of English. I'll put it more simply: If someone does not understand the implications of publishing highly personal information, including that which includes comments that could be taken as racist, and does himself no favours in terms of his CV, is he the sort of person that should be given access to stand in judgement over other people and have privileged access to information? Put another way, is this the sort of person who increases the stature of Wikipedia? The "it's just some tools" meme died a long time ago.
|
|
|
|
Theanima |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 222
Joined:
Member No.: 18,566
|
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 1st June 2010, 4:31pm) QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:54pm) QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 1st June 2010, 8:37am) QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:07am) Can this thread be tarpitted? Dumbass dogbiscuit is posting personal information that was probably intended to be private.
I have no Facebook relationship with this person. I blanked the email addresses. I felt the sheer quantity of publicly available information was noteworthy. I do note that his birthdate is in there, so I'll happily blank that, there was so much information up there I didn't spot it. If it wasn't intentional that he published it, then is the sort of person you want administrating Wikipedia, obviously someone of sound judgement. That's strange, I don't recall wanting him to become an admin. Of course, you know me better than I do. <sigh> Typos excepted, I would hope that those people who like to go around throwing casual insults would at least have the understanding of English. I'll put it more simply: If someone does not understand the implications of publishing highly personal information, including that which includes comments that could be taken as racist, and does himself no favours in terms of his CV, is he the sort of person that should be given access to stand in judgement over other people and have privileged access to information? Put another way, is this the sort of person who increases the stature of Wikipedia? The "it's just some tools" meme died a long time ago. Um, this was never in dispute. I opposed the guy for goodness sake. What is the issue is your unnecessary posting of his information here. As if to prove some sort of a point.
|
|
|
|
GlassBeadGame |
|
Dharma Bum
Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined:
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981
|
QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 10:12am) QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 1st June 2010, 4:31pm) QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:54pm) QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 1st June 2010, 8:37am) QUOTE(Theanima @ Tue 1st June 2010, 3:07am) Can this thread be tarpitted? Dumbass dogbiscuit is posting personal information that was probably intended to be private.
I have no Facebook relationship with this person. I blanked the email addresses. I felt the sheer quantity of publicly available information was noteworthy. I do note that his birthdate is in there, so I'll happily blank that, there was so much information up there I didn't spot it. If it wasn't intentional that he published it, then is the sort of person you want administrating Wikipedia, obviously someone of sound judgement. That's strange, I don't recall wanting him to become an admin. Of course, you know me better than I do. <sigh> Typos excepted, I would hope that those people who like to go around throwing casual insults would at least have the understanding of English. I'll put it more simply: If someone does not understand the implications of publishing highly personal information, including that which includes comments that could be taken as racist, and does himself no favours in terms of his CV, is he the sort of person that should be given access to stand in judgement over other people and have privileged access to information? Put another way, is this the sort of person who increases the stature of Wikipedia? The "it's just some tools" meme died a long time ago. Um, this was never in dispute. I opposed the guy for goodness sake. What is the issue is your unnecessary posting of his information here. As if to prove some sort of a point. He just told you, in plan English, the point. What does your personal position on his Rf A have to do with anything? Make sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |