The Oldest Living Transparent Window On The WP Scene, WikiAbuse.Com : Escape From The Sadly Ironic Cage Options Rating

[Jonny Cache]

Handbags & Gladrags ...

It has become utterly pointless to continue sinking time and effort into Rootology's Scam Site, so I will copy here all the work that we did on the SlimVirgin article before Rootology locked it down with that cute little image of SlimVirgin's handbag, and I'll try to clean it up, extend it, and reformat it as I get the time.

Jonny

{{Protected}}

'''SlimVirgin''' is an administrator of the [[English Wikipedia]].

==Details==

* {{wp-user|SlimVirgin}}
* {{wp-user|Slimv}} (retired account, contributions Oversighted completely away)
* '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Administrators_open_to_recall Open to recall]: No'''
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=SlimVirgin&namespace=2 All existing pages in SlimVirgin's user space.] There are two items she often deletes and restores, one being a list of what she suspects to be LaRouche Supporters<ref>Deletion log of User:SlimVirgin/L [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=SlimVirgin&page=User%3ASlimVirgin%2FL]</ref> and information that she keeps on User:Gnetwerker.<ref>Deletion log of User:SlimVirgin/GNT [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&user=SlimVirgin&page=User%3ASlimVirgin%2FGNT&pattern=&limit=500&offset=0]</ref>

==Modus operandi==

* '''Note.''' SlimVirgin is notable for achieving multiple violations in a single edit, so many of the items enumerated below may be found under several categories. In the fullness of time, as the data accumulate, a multiple response data model may be developed.

===Deceptive edit lines===

* '''Definition.''' This category covers all varieties of misinformative data on edit lines, including edit lines improperly marked as "minor" and the omission of descriptive data from non-minor edits.

# [[07 Sep 2006]], UTC 06:35, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&diff=74286464&oldid=74283412 SlimVirgin deletes, w/o edit line, a post by Jon Awbrey to Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research]
# [[10 Sep 2006]], UTC 14:50, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&diff=74909229&oldid=74907252 SlimVirgin deletes, w/o edit line, for the 2nd time, and deceptively marked as "minor", a post by Jon Awbrey to Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research]

{{stub}}

===Deleting or reverting other editors' discussion points===

# [[27 Aug 2006]], UTC 03:58, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&diff=72126580&oldid=72126029 SlimVirgin reverts post by Jon Awbrey to Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research]
# [[27 Aug 2006]], UTC 04:01, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jon_Awbrey&diff=72126989&oldid=72118197 SlimVirgin moves post by Jon Awbrey from Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research to User Talk : Jon Awbrey].
# [[07 Sep 2006]], UTC 06:35, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&diff=74286464&oldid=74283412 SlimVirgin deletes, w/o edit line, a post by Jon Awbrey to Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research]
# [[10 Sep 2006]], UTC 14:50, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&diff=74909229&oldid=74907252 SlimVirgin deletes, w/o edit line, for the 2nd time, and deceptively marked as "minor", a post by Jon Awbrey to Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research]
# [[19 Nov 2006]], UTC 19:26, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=88853501&oldid=88851031 Mass deletion of talk page comments without any edit summary] - later blanked the same talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=next&oldid=89024490 again] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=next&oldid=89031847 protected] it; Centrx later [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=prev&oldid=93446908 unprotected] it
# [[20 Nov 2006]], UTC 17:58, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=next&oldid=89046760 Removal of talk page comments] on same talk page as above
# [[08 Feb 2007]], UTC 08:05, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jon_Awbrey/NOR_historical_datapoints&diff=106524478&oldid=73177586 SlimVirgin moves an entire subpage of a policy talk page, "Wikipedia talk:No original research/Historical datapoints", to a user subpage, "User:Jon Awbrey/NOR historical datapoints"]

{{stub}}

===False testimony===

* '''Definition.''' Making false statements about matters of fact, including facts about other participants in the project. This includes making ostensibly uninformed statements in cases where due diligence and a modicum of respect for the verifiability of one's statements would easily bring the required information to light.

# <p>[[07 Sep 2006]], UTC 00:29, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive134#User:Jon_Awbrey_project_spam Testimony in Kangaroo Court proceedings against Jon Awbrey], "I'm not aware of any useful edits he makes &hellip;" &mdash; Jon Awbrey had 13,000 edits at the time.</p>
# [[11 Mar 2007]], UTC 16:19, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Political_views_of_Lyndon_LaRouche&diff=prev&oldid=114322367 Controversial accusation] — Discussed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive214#Abusive_behavior_by_User:SlimVirgin here]
#Accused an editor of posting on [[Wikipedia Review]] and living in the same state as a banned editor without presenting any evidence, apparently in order to sabotage the editor's candidacy for administrator (RfA). RfA is here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Cla68] and is also detailed in a Request for Comment (RfC) here [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Cla68].

{{stub}}

===Point of view warring===

{{stub}}

===Policy warping===

* '''Definition.''' Policy warping, as it affects sourced research, is the practice of aggressively altering policies and guidelines on sourced research to suit a pet point of view or a preferential theory of sourced research. Policy warping by Wikipedia Administrators has typically involved eliminating from the project any users who object to the warp.

{{stub}}

====Wikipedia Policy : No Original Research====

=====General Information=====

* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research Current version of Wikipedia Policy : No Original Research (WP:NOR)]

* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research&limit=3000&action=history WP:NOR Page History : Last 3000 Edits]

* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Historical_datapoints Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research / Historical Datapoints]

* [[Archive/Wikipedia Talk:No Original Research/Historical Datapoints|WikiAbuse Archive copy of "Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research / Historical Datapoints"]], since the original Wikipedia Policy Talk Page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Historical_datapoints keeps being deleted by SlimVirgin and Jayjg].

=====Incidents of Abuse=====

# [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Historical_datapoints&redirect=no "Wikipedia Talk : No Original Research / Historical Datapoints"], moved repeatedly by SlimVirgin and Jayjg to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/NOR_historical_datapoints "User : Jon Awbrey / NOR Historical Datapoints"]. This abuse is compounded by SlimVirgin's and Jayjg's repeated deletion of the automatic redirect, rendering the affected page move "opaque", that is, deceptively non-transparent.

===Tagteaming===

* '''Definition.''' Tagteaming is a strategy analogous in effect to campaigning or meatpuppeteering, except that it involves a far more serious abuse of power, in that Wikipedia Administrators in positions of trust pool their tools in a prejudicial manner to squash the good faith contributions and discussion points of other administrators, editors, and users.

# [[08 Feb 2007]], UTC 08:06, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Historical_datapoints SlimVirgin deletes the redirect created in the process of her "moving" the Policy Talk Page "Wikipedia talk:No original research/Historical datapoints" to "User:Jon Awbrey/NOR historical datapoints".] This was actually a net deletion since the final draft of this page was already in the user space.
# [[28 Mar 2007]], UTC 21:51, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Historical_datapoints Jayjg deletes the redirect created in the process of his "moving" the Policy Talk Page "Wikipedia talk:No original research/Historical datapoints" to "User:Jon Awbrey/NOR historical datapoints".]
# [[26 Jun 2007]], UTC 17:36, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Historical_datapoints SlimVirgin deletes the redirect restored by another editor.]

===User talk page Blitzkrieg===

* '''Definition.''' This category of abuse refers to the practice of attacking users on their talk pages in retaliation for disputing the principal's position in article or policy space.

# [[27 Aug 2006]], UTC 02:53, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jon_Awbrey&diff=72118197&oldid=72112155 SlimVirgin on User Talk : Jon Awbrey].
# [[27 Aug 2006]], UTC 04:01, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jon_Awbrey&diff=72126989&oldid=72118197 SlimVirgin on User Talk : Jon Awbrey].

{{stub}}

===Violations of Wikipedia's Five Pillars===

* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars Current version of Wikipedia : Five Pillars].

* '''Note.''' The current version of any Wikipedia policy or guideline may differ considerably from the version that was in effect at the time of the alleged abuse. Please check the contemporaneous listings for the applicable letter of the policy or guideline in question.

====Peremptory deletes and reverts of good faith edits====

# [[10 Mar 2007]], UTC 09:54, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charles_Peirce&diff=114034808&oldid=113656293 SlimVirgin on Charles Peirce, Reverts 3 months worth of edits by numerous editors based on the ''prima facie'' absurd and subsequently proven false charge that all of these edits were made by a single banned user]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikitruth&diff=prev&oldid=52969154 Unsubstantiated removal of talk page comments] which was later [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikitruth&diff=next&oldid=52969154 reverted] by another user
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=next&oldid=89048228 Removes "controversial" tag without any explanation]

==Administrative Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I) Discussions==

# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive41#User:SlimVirgin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adm...User:SlimVirgin]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive62#SlimVirgin_.26_fair_use_images_on_her_user_page Discussion regarding fair use images on SlimVirgin's user page]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive64#SlimVirgin_unblocking_.27Fair_Use.27_blocks Block controversy]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive87#User:SlimVirgin Edit war complaint]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/ IncidentArchive99#Disagreement_with_SlimVirgin_Over_Removal_of_Talk_Page_Comment
s.2C_Removal_of_Unreplied-To_Comments.2C_Etc. Several examples of talk page blanking] - some of the diffs have since been oversighted
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive100#SlimVirgin_and_WP:LIVING SlimVirgin and WP:LIVING]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive101#Nomination_by_PZFUN.2C_and_Speedy_keep_of_several_articles_by_Slimvirgin ANI discussion]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive104#Regarding_SlimVirgin ANI discussion]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/ IncidentArchive114#Admins_User:SlimVirgin_and_User:CommanderKeane_in_defense_of_
User:IronDuke ANI discussion]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive124#SlimVirgin_requested_me_to_not_edit_article ANI discussion]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive125#Slimvirgin_is_threatening_to_delete_my_subpage ANI discussion]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive127#SlimVirgin_and_a_serious_abuse_of_authority ANI discussion]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive214#Abusive_behavior_by_User:SlimVirgin ANI discussion]
# [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive232#SlimVirgin_violation_of_Wikipedia:Blocking_policy ANI discussion regarding controversial block]

==Known associates==

* [[Anonymous editor]] (she nominated him for Adminship)
* [[Crum375]] — There have been rumors that this is an alternate account used by SlimVirgin ("sockpuppet"), but investigations have found only unsupported rumors and nothing close to proof: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NathanLee&oldid=137367585#Please_stop_with_your_uncivil_comments NathanLee] and [http://nonbovine-ruminations.blogspot.com/2007/06/ethics-of-editing-via-anonymizing.html Someone on the blog] of [[Kelly Martin]]. Then there's ''"08:34, 30 July 2006 Fred Bauder (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SlimVirgin" (Horrible nonsense by WordBomb)"'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_SlimVirgin]. Then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ACrum375&diff=110254886&oldid=110086946 SlimVirgin edits Crum's userpage]. Then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Crum375&curid=5081218&diff=141013256&oldid=140996646 Someone vandalizes Crum's userpage saying Crum is Slim's sock] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=SlimVirgin&page=User%3AColintj SlimVirgin blocks the vandal].
* [[Jayjg]]
* [[Malber]] (not admin)
* [[Will Beback]]

== User:SlimVirgin/L ==
* A page used by SV to keep a "list of accounts known or strongly suspected as LaRouche movement accounts, in order of arrival." This is used to apparently track supporters of the United States politician [[Wikipedia:Lyndon LaRouche|Lyndon LaRouche]] who may be editing Wikipedia. If your name is on here, you are most likely banned, if not, you soon will be.

*''View it on a subpage [[Slimvirgin/L|here]]''

==Major events==

SlimVirgin is central to the relationship between Wikipedia and [[Daniel Brandt]], the founder of Wikipedia Watch, and a frequent contributor to Wikipedia Review - both organisations critical of Wikipedia. SlimVirgin was also instrumental in the partial resolution of Wikipedia's conflict with Brandt, with firm support in favour of the deletion of Brandt's article.

Various commentators have speculated as to the real life identity of SlimVirgin, something which is strongly frowned upon within the Wikipedia community.

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive19#Administrator_SlimVirgin.27s_Abuse_of_Power Controversy]

==Quotes==
*"This is no time to worry about the [[GFDL]]."<ref>This was in a now-deleted revision of [[Wikipedia:Talk:Daniel Brandt|Talk:Daniel Brandt]], see [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-June/074817.html]</ref>

*"I don't know who you think you are...don't ever remove one of my posts, or anyone else's, again."<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mangoe&diff=prev&oldid=137718392</ref>
*"''When you see an admin removing material, assume there is a reason, and don't assume the admin is a vandal. Just because you're not familiar with the reason doesn't mean it doesn't exist.''" - diff has since been oversighted, but was previously located [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWCityMike&diff=53081786&oldid=53080807 here] - for proof see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/ IncidentArchive99#Disagreement_with_SlimVirgin_Over_Removal_of_Talk_Page_Comment
s.2C_Removal_of_Unreplied-To_Comments.2C_Etc. this] ANI discussion where the diff is linked to

== Lists and categories of Jews ==
SlimVirgin objects to the existence of these lists and categories, and tries various ways to delete or remove names from them: "my preference would be to get rid of all categories and lists that try to shove human beings into these neat little piles" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_May_16#Category:Jewish_Americans].

==References==
{{reflist}}

[[Category:Administrators (English Wikipedia)]]

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Fri 29th June 2007, 6:12pm

[Rootology]

A scam site? Well, whatever, I suppose. Any Dissenting Or Contrary Opinions (WP:DOCO) of your own must not traffic with your own linguistic wit, to wit, lah dee da? Sheesh.

You're a sharp guy, Jon, and I saw your educational history, so that bears it out. But you're not smarter than everyone else, k?

[Jonny Cache]

A scam site? Well, whatever, I suppose. Any Dissenting Or Contrary Opinions (WP:DOCO) of your own must not traffic with your own linguistic wit, to wit, lah dee da? Sheesh.

You're a sharp guy, Jon, and I saw your educational history, so that bears it out. But you're not smarter than everyone else, k?

I am by nature an xtremely slow learner — it is merely that I've been kicked around the block enough times to recognize another drubbing when I see one coming.

And I served enough time in Wikiputia to recognize the symptons of people who are spending far more time in bak-channel communications working up a pre-deranged consensus for the diversion of the peanut gallery than they are genuinely devoting to above-the-board negotiations in open forum.

And those of us who can learn at all from the example of others have the abject case of what happened to DB when he was young and naive enough to make good faith overtures to those Data Base Sourcer's Apprentices (DBSA's).

That is the Sadder Budweiser way that some of us got wot modicum of smarts — Ouch ! — that we've got.

Jonny

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Fri 29th June 2007, 11:32pm

[guy]

But you're not smarter than everyone else, k?

No, that's Somey's job.