ColScott and BLP, (was: Colscott Says Hola) Options

[ColScott]

I've been following this for some time and wanted to join you. Thanks for the invite.




This post has been edited by ColScott: Fri 4th January 2008, 7:54am

[blissyu2]

Wait on, you directed Natural Born Killers? You'd be quite a big name. Wow, we have a big name Hollywood director writing on Wikipedia Review! Wow. Or were you the writer or something else?

I have never believed any of the nonsense about films influencing decisions, that's just stupid. People who want to do those things watch movies and listen to music to try to inspire them, but without the movies and music (etc) they'd just find something else to inspire them. They get the actual inspirations from their life experiences and their own beliefs, not from the films and music.

Lawsuits are a pain in the butt. I am having to sue one of my old landlords and its a real serious hassle. So we are just exchanging legal threats, and trying to sort something out. In the real world, outside of Wikipedia-land, that's how it usually works. Its just that in Wikipedia-land, legal threats are suddenly bad, and they encourage people breaking the law ahead of people who are victimised. I am seriously opposed to their NLT rule. They shouldn't ban people for legal threats - they should ban people for failing to adequately respond to legal threats. Its just wrong on so many levels that they do that. They then make it difficult to sue people, and difficult to continue with legal action, because they put obstacles in the way, and serve to protect people who are breaking the law. Just the same, you seriously should sue them. Really. Its a strong case. Combine with Daniel Brandt, and do it together, as your cases are similar. Actually go to court. Do it. We'll all help you.

As for Squeakbox, well, just remember that not everyone who comes to Wikipedia Review is a critic. Squeakbox seems to be the enemy of Jonny Cache, and that seems to be his main reason to be here. I could be wrong of course.

Anyone can come here, its just that topics will be directed in a certain way.

[SqueakBox]

As for Squeakbox, well, just remember that not everyone who comes to Wikipedia Review is a critic. Squeakbox seems to be the enemy of Jonny Cache, and that seems to be his main reason to be here. I could be wrong of course.

Enemy of Johnny Cache. You have to be kidding. I was brought here by Denny Colt and I like the place mostly so I stay, Johnny seems a nice enough guy and certainly has never received my emnity. And Col Scott knows who I am, I'm the guy who trimmed his article to remove any personal info and then afd it. The afd faield but the edits haver not been reverted (for longer than a few mins).

[Jonny Cache]

As for Squeakbox, well, just remember that not everyone who comes to Wikipedia Review is a critic. Squeakbox seems to be the enemy of Jonny Cache, and that seems to be his main reason to be here. I could be wrong of course.

Enemy of Jonny Cache. You have to be kidding. I was brought here by Denny Colt and I like the place mostly so I stay. Jonny seems a nice enough guy and certainly has never received my emnity. And ColScott knows who I am, I'm the guy who trimmed his article to remove any personal info and then afd it. The afd failed but the edits haver not been reverted (for longer than a few mins).

We all make allowances for Bliss — Aussie, y'know — all that time tryna hang on to the ⊥ of the planet, plus he works waaaaay too hard.

But here he's still just conphused about Who and What and Who's Wife and the Czech.

I'm starting to think he didn't get the memo.

Jonny

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Fri 31st August 2007, 7:12pm