The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What's Jayjg up to?, Where is he? What name is he using?
guy
post Thu 6th September 2007, 8:44am
Post #21


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



One thing we know for certain about ED is that it's totally unreliable, and people who try to confuse them with the facts get blocked.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Tue 25th September 2007, 3:19pm
Post #22


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Wed 5th September 2007, 9:51pm) *

Just so we're clear, this is the "official" statement:

QUOTE
*{{User2|Jayjg}} - An administrator, he last edited 04 August 2007. Has stated in private communications that he's preoccupied with other issues in his life.


Nothing on his user page tho.


Remember those WikiEN-l list communications from Jimbo and Company, assuring us that Jayjg's "investigation" was being handled privately, and they assured us that any result would be made "clear and public and transparent"?

What is the status of that investigation, now that nearly a month has slipped by?

Greg

This post has been edited by thekohser: Tue 25th September 2007, 3:25pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dtobias
post Tue 25th September 2007, 4:44pm
Post #23


Obsessive trolling idiot [per JzG]
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,213
Joined: Sun 11th Feb 2007, 2:45pm
From: Boca Raton, FL, USA
Member No.: 962

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(guy @ Thu 6th September 2007, 4:44am) *

One thing we know for certain about ED is that it's totally unreliable, and people who try to confuse them with the facts get blocked.


Their aim and purpose is to provide tasteless humor ("lulz" in their terminology), not facts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Tue 25th September 2007, 4:58pm
Post #24


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 25th September 2007, 3:19pm) *

QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Wed 5th September 2007, 9:51pm) *

Just so we're clear, this is the "official" statement:

QUOTE
*{{User2|Jayjg}} - An administrator, he last edited 04 August 2007. Has stated in private communications that he's preoccupied with other issues in his life.


Nothing on his user page tho.


Remember those WikiEN-l list communications from Jimbo and Company, assuring us that Jayjg's "investigation" was being handled privately, and they assured us that any result would be made "clear and public and transparent"?

What is the status of that investigation, now that nearly a month has slipped by?

Greg


It's clear and transparent that Wikipedia is a social club where there are rules for the in-crowd and there are rules for everyone else. And those rules are about keeping the in-crowd in place, regardless of what it takes to do that.

WP:IgnoreAllFacts is the main rule of the times.

And speaking of diversions, everytime one of the hypocrite gasbags that calls themselves Wikipedian Arbcommers or Admins gets called out and SHOWN POINT BLANK to be contradicting wikipedia rules themselves, it's all about the diversion.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 2:40am