The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Gary Weiss on naked short selling, trying to legitimize his actions
LamontStormstar
post Mon 24th September 2007, 9:46pm
Post #1


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,359
Joined: Fri 18th Aug 2006, 7:25am
Member No.: 342

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=159901271

The IP did two edits, second was typo, but first was "Corrected obtuse language which confuses naked short selling with legal short selling, highlight citatations of unsupported opinion as such."

The IP actually made naked short selling make sense instead of being unclear how it normally is on Wikipedia.


Ryulong, who is in cahoots with Weiss, Jayjg, SlimVirgin, and every other bad element on Wikipedia banned the IP for life to so it can never let truth appear on Wikipedia again.

IP said:
QUOTE

'''Naked short selling''', or '''naked shorting''', is a term used to refer to a form of stock manipulation involving the largely illegal practice of placing sales transactions for stock that the seller does not own, and has not borrowed. Hence, the sale is "naked", as the buyer's money is paid, but no share is delivered. Except for market makers in limited instances, deliberate delivery failure is prohibited by SEC rules. Naked short selling is not the same as innocent delivery failure due to lost or stolen certificates, nor is it related to legitimate short selling (where a share of stock is first borrowed before the sale is placed). The term refers to a deliberate practice designed to depress the price of the affected security, by creating the appearance of more supply than actually exists, by effecting sales transactions without capability or intent to deliver the shares sold.


That's naked short selling!


But Gary Weiss said:
QUOTE

'''Naked short selling''', or '''naked shorting''', is a form of [[Short selling|selling shares of securities short]] that seeks to profit from share price declines.


No, that's not naked short selling, which is illegal. That's regular short selling, which is legal.

The IP also did a few fixes in the second paragraph, too, but they're easier to see in diff mode: See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=159901271

I wonder how long until someone erases the diff!

Obvious, Gary Weiss is trying to legitimize his criminal actions

This post has been edited by LamontStormstar: Mon 24th September 2007, 9:48pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
LamontStormstar   Gary Weiss on naked short selling   Mon 24th September 2007, 9:46pm
guy   I had to adjust the title, which was tar pit mater...   Mon 24th September 2007, 10:32pm
Piperdown   I had to adjust the title, which was tar pit mate...   Tue 25th September 2007, 1:36am
LamontStormstar   I had to adjust the title, which was tar pit mate...   Tue 25th September 2007, 2:37am
Jonny Cache   I had to adjust the title, which was tar pit mate...   Tue 25th September 2007, 4:28am
WordBomb   Obvious, Gary Weiss is trying to legitimize his cr...   Tue 25th September 2007, 4:14am
Emperor   Obvious, Gary Weiss is trying to legitimize his c...   Tue 25th September 2007, 4:41pm
Piperdown   [quote name='WordBomb' post='51682' date='Tue 25t...   Tue 25th September 2007, 4:46pm
Emperor   You see, Wikipedia is not the real world. It app...   Tue 25th September 2007, 5:12pm
guy   Wikipedians should not be trying to right social ...   Tue 25th September 2007, 11:24pm
Unrepentant Vandal   No, that's not naked short selling, which can...   Tue 25th September 2007, 3:52pm
dtobias   One shouldn't be indecently exposed when one i...   Tue 25th September 2007, 4:25pm
JohnA   Looks like a user Dozen13 is being overwritten by ...   Tue 25th September 2007, 8:27pm
LamontStormstar   [...] Jon Awbrey/Willy on Wheels sock [...] And ...   Tue 25th September 2007, 11:09pm
WhispersOfWisdom   Naked Shorting ...from investopedia. The illega...   Tue 25th September 2007, 10:08pm


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 6 13, 6:29am