The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

> Elder Scrolls III: Amorrowind
LamontStormstar
post Thu 18th October 2007, 10:06pm
Post #1


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,359
Joined: Fri 18th Aug 2006, 7:25am
Member No.: 342

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Elder Scrolls III: Amorrowind

They made: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lon...m_abuse/Amorrow




Now that's talking tough on the Internet! (below)

QUOTE

Now you march you and your friends on back to [[Talk:Elizabeth_Morgan]] where we are still having our nice little party.


Quote from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=20549516

This post has been edited by LamontStormstar: Thu 18th October 2007, 10:23pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
LamontStormstar   Elder Scrolls III: Amorrowind   Thu 18th October 2007, 10:06pm
blissyu2   At least it gives the reader some idea of what he ...   Fri 19th October 2007, 1:11am
LamontStormstar   At least it gives the reader some idea of what he...   Fri 19th October 2007, 1:20am
everyking   "Keeping track of him is considerably problem...   Fri 19th October 2007, 4:24am
The Joy   "Keeping track of him is considerably proble...   Fri 19th October 2007, 4:50am
GlassBeadGame   [quote name='everyking' post='55322' date='Fri 19...   Fri 19th October 2007, 4:56am
everyking   [quote name='everyking' post='55322' date='Fri 19...   Fri 19th October 2007, 5:00am
Somey   Whatever someone has done does not invalidate the ...   Fri 19th October 2007, 6:13am
everyking   Whatever someone has done does not invalidate the...   Fri 19th October 2007, 6:26am
Alison   If the recent alleged Amorrow sock was indeed his...   Fri 19th October 2007, 4:57pm
blissyu2   Y'know, you're absolutely correct, Everyk...   Fri 19th October 2007, 5:49pm
everyking   [quote name='everyking' post='55341' date='Thu 18...   Fri 19th October 2007, 8:33pm
Alison   I myself was completely in favor of an absolute ...   Fri 19th October 2007, 9:11pm
everyking   I myself was completely in favor of an absolute...   Fri 19th October 2007, 10:15pm
Sxeptomaniac   Well, maybe I don't know what he's been d...   Fri 19th October 2007, 11:04pm
guy   I believe it's just beyond the scope of what ...   Sat 20th October 2007, 12:41pm
blissyu2   The issue is one of legal liability, not of whethe...   Fri 19th October 2007, 7:35am
everyking   The issue is one of legal liability, not of whethe...   Fri 19th October 2007, 7:55am
dtobias   Wikipedia (and Wikipedia Review) cannot allow any...   Fri 19th October 2007, 5:44pm
guy   Does this mean that Encyclopedia Britannica, or t...   Fri 19th October 2007, 7:53pm
blissyu2   I guess that ultimately Wikipedia has no control o...   Fri 19th October 2007, 10:37pm
everyking   And in the end the solution to the Amorrow situat...   Fri 19th October 2007, 10:44pm
LamontStormstar   Read this stuff by Amorrow http://wikipediareview....   Sat 20th October 2007, 8:48am
blissyu2   I should point out that Amorrow's official pos...   Sat 20th October 2007, 8:58am
LamontStormstar   I should point out that Amorrow's official po...   Sat 20th October 2007, 9:13am
blissyu2   I should point out that Amorrow's official p...   Sat 20th October 2007, 7:12pm
Sxeptomaniac   Read this stuff by Amorrow http://wikipediareview...   Sun 21st October 2007, 1:46am


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th 9 10, 7:16pm