QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Fri 19th October 2007, 12:43am)

JzG delivers a
tour d'horizon of
all our latest threads, for the benefit of the ArbCom. Then Charles Matthews restates it.
Bagley didn't edit Wikipedia to "skew" Byrne/Overstock/NSS articles. I don't think he even edited them at all. And claiming that I and dozens of other editors of those articles is Bagley is thoughtcrime - and SlimVirgin and lil 'GW had it working wonderfully (for a while).
But taggging anyone who called bullshit on Gary Weiss's activities on those articles as Bagley/Wordbomb is a great way to lie.
Bagley went to WP with COI proof.
Unfortunately for him it was proof against the inner circle itself.
So that proof (and that is all ASM is, folks, NPOV, unmitigated scientific proof, facts laid out so even an Arbcom member could figure it out) has been tarred and feathered as "harrassment" and "attacks".
When liars are proven to be liars, they shout "harrassment" and "attacks".
And that's what's been going down on Wikipedia.
Guy is, to use a phrase that David Gerard can understand, a fucking idiot.
This post has been edited by Piperdown: Fri 19th October 2007, 12:58am