QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Thu 18th October 2007, 9:09pm)

I'd like to know since when Wikipedia Review was substantially dedicated to harassment. Since when? I'd like to see where it says in our charter that we aim to harass and harm other users, and that that is our primary function. As far as we all knew, our primary function was to criticise. If, in the course of criticising, we do some things that some such as JzG interpret as being harassment, then that is a very different thing to suggesting that that is our point of existence. I don't think that anyone here is deliberately harassing anyone from Wikipedia.
Well, when I exposed that JzG had a flurry of IP edits on articles associated with women with enormous breasts, I suppose that was not exactly intended to provide constructive criticism of Guy Chapman's experience on Wikipedia. But, he hadn't listened to my constructive criticism for at least 8 or 9 months, so he really left me no choice but to drop the A-Bomb.
(Actually, it was more like a DD-Bomb.)
Greg
P.S. That still isn't harassment, though. Just using WikiScanner the same way all those Wikipediots used it to embarrass Fortune 500 companies.