Typical Wikipedians, terrified of the very possibility that their seemingly perfect engine is tainted, and so they make up lies about the source of Criticism. I would challenge any WikipediAdmin or WikidepiUser that hates WR to look at the top 10 most viewed threads, and then tell us with a straight face that WR is unreliable and contributes nothing.
Puh-lease! I know there are some users here that are open to question (people like Amorrow are people who have tainted WR and who WR have removed, but there are a few more extreme guys like those who violate Godwin's Law and who are very abusive and sweary when talking about WikipediAdmins and such and also do the same to other WR members. Those types we could do without) but a lot of what is here is constructive criticism. And besides, if the SlimVirgin identity case that WR talks about is so untrue, then a) why is Slimmy so nervous and
why did Slashdot proceed to promote the story which proved so damning of her?
It will take time, but with Wikipedia's ever declining situation, WR will eventually be exceedingly recognised, along with WikiTruth, as a definitive source for explaining what is wrong with Wikipedia and how it can be fixed.
God I haven't posted here in a while. It's good to be back! Especially from the cheery mood I always get from hearing Somey's and Johnny Cache's witticisms.
JzG: Wikipedia Review superfan
Fri 19th October 2007, 12:43am
