|
Well, the arbitrators are starting to reject it, pretty much saying "no, it doesn't matter if the RfC was unfair".
I don't get all the "Moulton thinks Wikipedia is online journalism" stuff. The verifiability policy is pretty clear; demanding that things be verifiable is the way in which Wikipedia should try to get at the truth. From where did the strange idea here come, that trying to publish true information is bad?
|