| |
Jim62sch Arbitration Case |
|
|
| Castle Rock |
Tue 1st January 2008, 10:20am
|
Senior Member
   
Group: Regulars
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu 13th Sep 2007, 7:27am
From: Oregon
Member No.: 3,051

|
A pseudoscience spat spills over into someone's RFA and a complaint is posted on the ANI. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Jim62sch Jim and image cop Videmus Omnia get at it immediately. Accusations of off-wiki harassment, appeals to Jimmy Wales, and hurt feelings abound. QUOTE Yes, another member of the club. You don't believe Jim would engage in off-wiki harrassment? Jim threatened to contact my employer on a suspicion that I was editing Wikipedia from my employer's network. After viewing his e-mail, Jimbo said "In my opinion, that's enough to ban Jim62Sch right there. This is not the kind of person I want participating in Wikipedia, period, full stop.". Unfortunately there was no followup. Videmus Omnia Talk 20:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Jim threatens to get him in trouble at work for wasting time on government computers playing around at Wikipedia. QUOTE (ri)Go for it. However, you seem to forget that as a federal employee it is my duty to try to stop waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government, and this includes the military. That's not harrassment, sarge, that's known as doing one's duty as a civil servant as described by the OGE. Do you really want to take this further? Feel free to, if you wish, but I doubt it'll prove satisfactory to anyone. Why you felt the need to bring this up here is beyond me, but so be it. The simple fact of the matter is that the federal government and the military have a limited personal use policy regarding PC's. Enough said? •Jim62sch• 23:35, 31 December 2007 (UTC) QUOTE > From: Jim62sch [jim62sch@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:24 AM > To: Videmus Omnia > Subject: Wikipedia e-mail > > This is a confidential and private e-mail -- i.e., it's > copyrighted and not for release to anyone. > > > (Videmus Omnia), > > Are we ready to have some fun? I sure as hell am. > > BTW, what's the private use policy on USAF PC's? Or LAN lines? > > Jim > > © 2007 Jim62Sch
copy-righted email? shades of durova Escalated to Arbitration, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Req...ration#Jim62sch, within hours. This post has been edited by Castle Rock: Wed 2nd January 2008, 12:59am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
Replies
| One |
Sat 5th January 2008, 11:26pm
|

Postmaster General
       
Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,553
Joined: Tue 25th Dec 2007, 10:49am
Member No.: 4,284
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(KStreetSlave @ Sat 5th January 2008, 7:24am)  There is no obligation. Anyone that ever thought there was one is stupid. Certainly not one from contractor or civilian agency to DoD. Unless orangemarlin works for the inspector general's office, or CID/NCIS/OSI, which I'm pretty sure he doesn't. You would think that settles the matter, but OrangeMarlin insists that he still has an obligation anyway. Swatjester makes one hell of a reply. ("I know it may be hard for an officer, but try using some common sense.") If I was in Washington, I'd by the man a drink. Well, for this, and for serving in Iraq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GlassBeadGame |
Sun 6th January 2008, 4:36am
|

Dharma Bum
        
Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 12:55am
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981

|
QUOTE(One @ Sat 5th January 2008, 6:26pm)  QUOTE(KStreetSlave @ Sat 5th January 2008, 7:24am)  There is no obligation. Anyone that ever thought there was one is stupid. Certainly not one from contractor or civilian agency to DoD. Unless orangemarlin works for the inspector general's office, or CID/NCIS/OSI, which I'm pretty sure he doesn't. You would think that settles the matter, but OrangeMarlin insists that he still has an obligation anyway. Swatjester makes one hell of a reply. ("I know it may be hard for an officer, but try using some common sense.") If I was in Washington, I'd by the man a drink. Well, for this, and for serving in Iraq. Jesus, is it just me or is it petty beyond all comprehension to even consider ratting-out a soldier for editing Wikipedia, whether you have an "obligation" or not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sxeptomaniac |
Mon 7th January 2008, 8:54pm
|
Senior Member
   
Group: Regulars
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu 18th Oct 2007, 11:49pm
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 3,542
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Sat 5th January 2008, 8:36pm)  QUOTE(One @ Sat 5th January 2008, 6:26pm)  QUOTE(KStreetSlave @ Sat 5th January 2008, 7:24am)  There is no obligation. Anyone that ever thought there was one is stupid. Certainly not one from contractor or civilian agency to DoD. Unless orangemarlin works for the inspector general's office, or CID/NCIS/OSI, which I'm pretty sure he doesn't. You would think that settles the matter, but OrangeMarlin insists that he still has an obligation anyway. Swatjester makes one hell of a reply. ("I know it may be hard for an officer, but try using some common sense.") If I was in Washington, I'd by the man a drink. Well, for this, and for serving in Iraq. Jesus, is it just me or is it petty beyond all comprehension to even consider ratting-out a soldier for editing Wikipedia, whether you have an "obligation" or not? Petty, but not beyond comprehension for anyone who's run into those guys before. I think the only thing that limits what they are willing to do in order to drive off perceived opponents is what they think they can get away with. As far as OM's officer status, it's clear from his comments that he's a reserve officer. Given some stories I've heard from friend who trained reserves a few years back, being a reserve officer is not in itself a whole lot to brag about. This post has been edited by Sxeptomaniac: Mon 7th January 2008, 8:59pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| KStreetSlave |
Mon 7th January 2008, 9:25pm
|
Senior Member
   
Group: Regulars
Posts: 352
Joined: Tue 11th Dec 2007, 6:33pm
Member No.: 4,123

|
QUOTE(Sxeptomaniac @ Mon 7th January 2008, 3:54pm)  QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Sat 5th January 2008, 8:36pm)  QUOTE(One @ Sat 5th January 2008, 6:26pm)  QUOTE(KStreetSlave @ Sat 5th January 2008, 7:24am)  There is no obligation. Anyone that ever thought there was one is stupid. Certainly not one from contractor or civilian agency to DoD. Unless orangemarlin works for the inspector general's office, or CID/NCIS/OSI, which I'm pretty sure he doesn't. You would think that settles the matter, but OrangeMarlin insists that he still has an obligation anyway. Swatjester makes one hell of a reply. ("I know it may be hard for an officer, but try using some common sense.") If I was in Washington, I'd by the man a drink. Well, for this, and for serving in Iraq. Jesus, is it just me or is it petty beyond all comprehension to even consider ratting-out a soldier for editing Wikipedia, whether you have an "obligation" or not? Petty, but not beyond comprehension for anyone who's run into those guys before. I think the only thing that limits what they are willing to do in order to drive off perceived opponents is what they think they can get away with. As far as OM's officer status, it's clear from his comments that he's a reserve officer. Given some stories I've heard from friend who trained reserves a few years back, being a reserve officer is not in itself a whole lot to brag about. OM self admitted that he was a Lieutenant Commander in the Navy, which according to the article is the equivalent to a Major. I don't know about the navy, but in the air force, where VO is, reserve majors are probably more common than field mice. I think I read somewhere that VO is an active duty Master Sergeant. But I'm not sure on that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Castle Rock Jim62sch Arbitration Case Tue 1st January 2008, 10:20am Disillusioned Lackey DMCA!!!!!
(only if he does it... Tue 1st January 2008, 10:26am Moulton Jim62Sch works for the US Government, and threaten... Tue 1st January 2008, 12:02pm Cedric
Jim62Sch works for the US Government, and threate... Tue 1st January 2008, 4:54pm BobbyBombastic Here is the link to the main arb case.
Jim62Sch ... Thu 3rd January 2008, 6:52pm  Derktar
Here is the link to the main arb case.
Jim62Sch... Thu 3rd January 2008, 7:04pm Nathan E-mails are not copyrighted. I can forward them to... Tue 1st January 2008, 5:57pm One
E-mails are not copyrighted. I can forward them t... Wed 2nd January 2008, 12:48am  GlassBeadGame
E-mails are not copyrighted. I can forward them ... Wed 2nd January 2008, 11:23pm   Firsfron of Ronchester
What provision of the UCMJ is he relying on?
A... Wed 2nd January 2008, 11:28pm michael The talk about making it a private case reminds me... Wed 2nd January 2008, 10:52pm Nathan
The talk about making it a private case reminds m... Wed 2nd January 2008, 11:54pm dogbiscuit One of the crazy things in Jim et al.'s denial... Thu 3rd January 2008, 9:02am Moulton Jim62Sch engages in a practice called the double b... Thu 3rd January 2008, 9:57am Sxeptomaniac Jim62sch and OrangeMarlin will do just about anyth... Thu 3rd January 2008, 6:19pm Moulton Jim62sch and OrangeMarlin will do just about anyth... Thu 3rd January 2008, 7:42pm Samuel Culper Sr.
Jim62sch and OrangeMarlin will do just about anyt... Thu 3rd January 2008, 7:44pm  Sxeptomaniac
Jim62sch and OrangeMarlin will do just about any... Thu 3rd January 2008, 9:08pm   Moulton Don't forget their favorite tactic of insultin... Thu 3rd January 2008, 9:20pm Moulton Back in September, I wrote the General Counsel of ... Thu 3rd January 2008, 8:11pm    Moulton I think the only thing that limits what they are w... Mon 7th January 2008, 8:58pm Moulton Crime and punishment regulatory models are just so... Sun 6th January 2008, 5:17am Jonny Cache I thought they had a «Don't Ask, Don't Te... Sun 6th January 2008, 5:40am KStreetSlave
I thought they had a «Don't Ask, Don't T... Sun 6th January 2008, 7:05am dogbiscuit I can't think of a worse way of losing support... Mon 7th January 2008, 10:12pm Moulton So lemme see if I have this straight...
There are... Mon 7th January 2008, 10:15pm KStreetSlave
So lemme see if I have this straight...
There ar... Mon 7th January 2008, 10:28pm Viridae
So lemme see if I have this straight...
There a... Wed 9th January 2008, 10:37pm dogbiscuit Wake up at the back there! Yes you, laddy. You... Mon 14th January 2008, 9:57am
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |