FT2, Fainites, NLP whitewash and booting anti-pedophiles Options

[Docknell]

Looks like FT2 is working hard to defend NLP promoters (and boot anti-pedophile editors)

Here is FT2’s and Fainites’ work. As we know, Fainites works with a company called Comaze.com on keeping the NLP article’s science view as obscured as possible:

http://www.nlpconnections.com/members/comaze.html
http://www.nlpconnections.com/members/fainites.html

Fainites (a Lucinda Davis) has also been working with admin FT2 to keep NLP sanitized on other articles:

On this article Fainites is trying to remove NLP associations with pseudoscientific aspects of attachment therapy

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=114357153

There was a huge war going on there, and eventually, arbitration. So of course, for the sake of impartiality, FT2 turns up to put the boot in

DPeterson seems to have been quite strongly anti-pedophile and got good support from other perhaps reasonable admin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arb...n_from_Fainites


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_tal...r_the_candidate


I have to admit that Dpeterson and alleged socks do seem to have pushed a bit of a unvalidated therapy, but then again it does have some limited support. Certainly though the others have a COI motive to beat him up and kick him out.

DPeterson then was banned, much to the delight of the pedophiles
http://www.boychat.org/messages/1088517.htm

Interestingly, at around that time, FT2 added this to the NPOV article
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=147447534

It places in primary position the notion that verifiability etc can be abused. Why is that given priority? It seems so because FT2 is not keen at all on verifiability, and would like to use that excuse to boot editors who use perfectly verifiable facts (and boot the facts). As we all know FT2 is rather keen on promoting fringe practices (such as bestiality) over the normal majority reaction.

Bestiality promotion, booting anti-pedophile editors, working with NLP promoters of pseudoscience…. It looks pretty much like a WP fringe, crank, perv fest, all with admin backing.

Big big shame!

[Moulton]

At this point, Wikipedia may well be incurable and incorrigible. The cancer is embedded way too deep, and has metastasized throughout the body.

As I've noted before, a fish rots from the head down.