The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What WP and WR both need, ...Paging Stanley Bing
Piperdown
post Tue 12th February 2008, 12:48am
Post #1


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



It's about time a WP Admin (what do they call the UberAdmins on WP) of some sort of funnypower status comes on W-R, double sekret anonymously, and becomes the Stanley Bing (WP him if not familiar) of WP, on W-R.

Win-win.

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Tue 12th February 2008, 12:48am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Amarkov
post Tue 12th February 2008, 12:55am
Post #2


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 27th Oct 2007, 1:02am
From: Figure it out and get a cookie
Member No.: 3,635

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Except none of the UberAdmins would ever do that. It needs to be someone that couldn't just be decried as an evil sleeper agent, or it obviously won't help.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Tue 12th February 2008, 12:57am
Post #3


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



I kidd you not, this is actually written on the Stanley Bing entry on WP. Holy freaking cow, what a joke. This is the sort of stuff I was shocked to see in March 2007 when L'Affair D'Essjay occurred that spurred me on to WP BLPs.

QUOTE

Publication of identity

In January of 1996, a fatuous, drunken journalist who had happened to work with Bing at Esquire decided to share what had been a closely held secret since 1984 with a mean-spirited reporter from the New York Times. And so it was that on a Monday morning, as a blizzard hit New York, the Times published a breathless article revealing that Bing was actually Schwartz, who worked for a big media company. The Times reporter, who has since been sent to Asia in an unrelated development, attempted to raise issues of propriety about Bing and his alter-ego, but was unsuccessful. Amusing reactions came from John Huey, then editor of FORTUNE, and Michael Jordan, head of CBS who, when asked about Bing, referred the matter to Schwartz. Since that first outing, Bing has repeatedly been dramatically revealed as if it had never been done before each time he emerges to publicize a book. He is possibly the only author who has ever been so aggressively and pervasively denied the anonymity afforded by a pseudonym. Even on Amazon.com, his books are sometimes listed as having been partially written by Schwartz.




If that passage had "odious", "baloney", "lipstick on a pig", or "nervous breakdown" in it, I'd swear the writing style was our very own Mantanmoreland. It reads with the same unbiased, professional reporting prose.

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Tue 12th February 2008, 1:08am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 5 13, 8:55pm