The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Was Mantanmoreland on the SuperSekritSyberStalking list???, Durova's evidence in the Arb-com case suggests just this....
Disillusioned Lackey
post Wed 11th June 2008, 7:29am
Post #21


Unregistered









Per this section :
Durova said:
QUOTE
I'm of two minds, frankly.

no comment.

This post has been edited by Disillusioned Lackey: Wed 11th June 2008, 8:43am
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dogbiscuit
post Wed 11th June 2008, 8:26am
Post #22


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



QUOTE(Disillusioned Lackey @ Wed 11th June 2008, 8:29am) *

Per this section :
Durova said:
QUOTE
Now I'm not going to voice an opinion on the merits of the circumstantial evidence here. I'm of two minds, frankly.

You know, there's a DSM-IV category for that.

I'm just sayin' unsure.gif

The more appropriate quote is this:

QUOTE

On the other hand, I think Mantanmoreland could have lied to me and played upon my trust in a place where I came to protect my elderly uncle, and that prospect makes me very very angry.


That seems pretty explicit to me, which also ties SlimVirgin to him.

So, can someone disentangle SlimVirgin's characterisation of WR, which is that we are inherently evil because of the accepted membership here, and the SooperSekritSyberStawking list?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Piperdown
post Sun 15th June 2008, 1:01am
Post #23


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Mon 10th Sep 2007, 3:09pm
Member No.: 2,995



QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Wed 11th June 2008, 8:26am) *


That seems pretty explicit to me, which also ties SlimVirgin to him.


what ties Gary Weiss and Linda Mack together is they both had a vested interest (one old vendetta and one new one) in seeing Patrick Byrne get hammered on Wikipedia. Linda had taken an active interest in the BLP of every notable person that she's known in real life. I'm surprised she had enough discipline to not edit Byrne's BLP, but that's probably because she was outed as knowing him before that BLP became "in play" on WP. When she thought she was anonymous, she did edit scores of BLP's before that. The ones that she didn't edit in a positive light, she got Jayjg to oversight. Namely the man that disgraced her, Pierre Salinger.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Disillusioned Lackey
post Sun 15th June 2008, 11:11am
Post #24


Unregistered









QUOTE

On the other hand, I think Mantanmoreland could have lied to me and played upon my trust in a place where I came to protect my elderly uncle, and that prospect makes me very very angry.


Where did she come to protect her elderly uncle? You mean the picture of him on ED?

How did she "come to protect" him? Does anyone have any freaking idea what she's talking about?

Is there a logic thread here? Or is this a mere disjointed rant?

This post has been edited by Disillusioned Lackey: Sun 15th June 2008, 11:12am
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd 5 13, 1:56am