The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article Candidates • Featured Article Review • Articles for Deletion • Deletion Review

 
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wikipedia Article Traffic Statistics, Henrik's Hit Parade : WATS UP DOC?
Jonny Cache
post Sun 23rd March 2008, 7:28pm
Post #1


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs


Henrik's Hit Counter seems to be working again.

I keep losing track of it, so I'll put a link here:

http://stats.grok.se/en/200803/Inquiry

Jonny cool.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Mon 18th August 2008, 4:26pm
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911
Henrik seems to have taken a long vacation, and with it, so goes the monthly updates to his Henrik-o-Meter (one of the most valuable tools I've seen come out of Wikipedia in the past two years).

Shanker pointed out in his not-to-be-linked-to blog that the WMF has plans to beef up where Henrik left off.

Those of us who use Wikipedia to redirect traffic to clients' sites really need these tools to be restored and made up-to-date!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 10th August 2011, 7:25pm
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911
Another user has compressed Henrik's traffic tool data into a multi-year snapshot view.

It makes articles like Rachel Marsden really come to life.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Thu 15th December 2011, 9:25pm
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911
Okay, who started having fun with the Wikipedia Review page? Bot, anyone?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Thu 5th January 2012, 7:51pm
Post #5


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 15th December 2011, 4:25pm) *

Okay, who started having fun with the Wikipedia Review page? Bot, anyone?


Now #2 on the WikiTrends index.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carbuncle
post Thu 5th January 2012, 8:06pm
Post #6


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 5th January 2012, 7:51pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 15th December 2011, 4:25pm) *

Okay, who started having fun with the Wikipedia Review page? Bot, anyone?


Now #2 on the WikiTrends index.

I think you should take those stats with a grain of salt - I notice that Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol appears on both the "uptrends" (++140,700%) and "downtrends" (-73,800%)...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd 5 13, 12:34pm