The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> The "Intelligent Design" Theory Of Wikipedia, Er, Maybe We Should Call That "Intentional Design"
Rating  3
Jon Awbrey
post Thu 24th April 2008, 12:12pm
Post #1


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,738
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



There's a theme, so far ex tempore, that persists in tugging at my little gray cells in divers and sundry e-vironments. I will begin by replicating and mutating an unnatural selection of these sporting thoughts here.

Jon cool.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Jon Awbrey
post Sun 27th April 2008, 2:42pm
Post #2


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,738
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Tongue In Cheek (TIC)?

In my youth I had a fairly robust Integrating Facility (IF), but I let it wax rusty in the iron cage of oeuvre-speciation, so it's something of a struggle for me to integrate the many-splintered themes that I enumerated above, not to mention the yarn-bag packed full of loose threads and tangled skeins from which I can hardly tease them.

And now another Infantile Fantasy (IF) hits the fan — it's the one that goes a bit like this:

We're all perfectly equal in our knowledge of everything, and all it takes is the stubborn insistence of random jostling in gang-banging ganglia of self-confessed I-Am-Not-An-Expert-Bots for the obseen hand of e-volution, re*acting witlessly to one damn e-mergency after another, for knowledge to arise in the Systern.

It is of course but another turn on a very old gambit, so a word to the wise will be sufficient — how about this one:

∃←Ø (Something For Nothing)
That Old Con (TOC)!

Jon cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jon Awbrey: Sun 27th April 2008, 4:50pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Mon 28th April 2008, 12:26am
Post #3


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Sun 27th April 2008, 2:42pm) *

It is of course but another turn on a very old gambit, so a word to the wise will be sufficient — how about this one:

∃←Ø (Something For Nothing)
That Old Con (TOC)!

Jon cool.gif

No, the only actual con is "Money for nothing and the chicks are free." That never happens. However, the universe itself is the ultimate free lunch (Guth) or Big Lurch, and all the "freebies" from there, have been driven by the increasing entropy from that beginning. To be specific, all the little free lunches result from the Big Lurch™. Including you and me.

This post has been edited by Milton Roe: Mon 28th April 2008, 12:40am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 5 13, 1:41pm