|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
| Herschelkrustofsky |
Tue 29th April 2008, 6:54am
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,199 Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm From: Kalifornia Member No.: 130 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
An alert faculty member at the University of Santa Clara sent us this notice of the upcoming conference, to be held on May 15.
QUOTE Wikipedia is ubiquitous on the Web. A search for any obscure information is likely to wind up in a link to one of its entries (try 'sardines' or 'Transylvania' on Google for example). It is an incredible boon: a huge information repository, which has been generated in a few short years. But Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia in the traditional sense; administrators are not always experts in the fields they edit, and the project's consensus editing model has its detractors. Entries on contested issues, such as the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, have been the site of protracted editing wars between opponents. It looks like it may be a quasi-debate between Mike Godwin and a Wikipedia critic by the name of Carl Hewitt: QUOTE "Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia because of censorship by its Administrators, instant publishing of anonymously submitted content, lack of accountability, and disrespect for expertise." --Carl Hewitt |
| Moulton |
Tue 29th April 2008, 10:26am
Post
#2
|
![]() Anthropologist from Mars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 10,220 Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm From: Greater Boston Member No.: 3,670 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Carl Hewitt is an Emeritus Professor of MIT who was unceremoniously banned, primarily for daring to edit his own biography.
Ironically, Mike Godwin also admits to having edited his own biography. Hewitt sets forth the somewhat tedious details of his initial complaint here. The Guardian carried a story about his banning. I personally invited the journalist who wrote that story to answer her critics here, but she declined to respond to my invitation. This post has been edited by Moulton: Tue 29th April 2008, 10:43am |
| guy |
Tue 29th April 2008, 11:49am
Post
#3
|
|
Postmaster General ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Inactive Posts: 4,294 Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm From: London Member No.: 23 |
|
| Somey |
Wed 14th May 2008, 4:26am
Post
#4
|
![]() Can't actually moderate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,814 Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
Apparently Mr. Godwin has "bowed out" of this event:
http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focus...pedia-panel.htm ...and I guess it was too late to replace him, since it's only two days away. Hard cheese on them - it's not much of a "panel discussion" when you have just one guest and one moderator...! So I wonder why Godwin ditched? Is he too busy with WMF damage control these days, what with the Erik Moeller story and all the porn-related stuff? SCU isn't that far from San Franscisco, so I'd assume it isn't a travel-related issue, unless he was called away to Singapore all of a sudden. |
| Kato |
Wed 14th May 2008, 4:35am
Post
#5
|
|
dhd ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 5,521 Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm Member No.: 767 |
According to Valleywag
http://valleywag.com/390155/wikipedia-lawy...-of-ethics-talk "But in the face of a groundswell of criticism of Wikipedia — that its frontman, Jimmy Wales, is corrupt; that its executive director, Sue Gardner, is power-mad; and that its deputy director, Erik Möller, is dangerously out of touch with potential donors' views — Godwin has remained silent." Let's be clear, the idea that a representative of Wikipedia would appear at a forum to discuss "ethics and values" seems so incongruous that in retrospect, Godwin's probably made a safer choice by staying away. |
| thekohser |
Wed 14th May 2008, 4:56am
Post
#6
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm Member No.: 911 |
Let's be clear, the idea that a representative of Wikipedia would appear at a forum to discuss "ethics and values" seems so incongruous that in retrospect, Godwin's probably made a safer choice by staying away. Indeed, the University would have had to set aside 40 minutes for pure, sustained laughter once audience members started to put these elements together. |
| Somey |
Wed 14th May 2008, 5:06am
Post
#7
|
![]() Can't actually moderate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 11,814 Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
Let's be clear, the idea that a representative of Wikipedia would appear at a forum to discuss "ethics and values" seems so incongruous that in retrospect, Godwin's probably made a safer choice by staying away. Hmm. I can see why he wouldn't want to get ambushed over the Erik Moeller allegations, but you'd think he (and they) would have come up with at least some sort of excuse - not having one just leads to speculation that they're clamming up to protect themselves from angry mobs. (Ironic though that may be.) Then again, people will probably think that no matter what they say, so saying something will just lead to additional speculation that they're lying, too. One of the Valleywag commenters kinda-sorta hinted that Godwin may now be realizing that he made a Bad Career Move in taking the WMF job, which I could certainly agree with. If only he'd spent some time on Wikipedia Review beforehand, we might have talked him out of it! ![]() |
| Moulton |
Wed 14th May 2008, 5:50am
Post
#8
|
![]() Anthropologist from Mars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 10,220 Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm From: Greater Boston Member No.: 3,670 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Time to bathe the chickens.
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st 5 13, 2:28am |