I just got my first block, Bet you can't guess why Options

[Pussy Galore]

Just look at the unblock request I have on my talk page and the sections I've linked (particularly the link to the section at the bottom of my talk page) it will tell you everything you need to know.

This post has been edited by Pussy Galore: Sun 4th May 2008, 6:20am

[Giggy]

He sure did, on Wikipedia we call it the [[WP:SNOW|snowball clause]].

[Pussy Galore]

He sure did, on Wikipedia we call it the [[WP:SNOW|snowball clause]].

I hope you were being sarcastic. The "snowball clause" is an essay, not a policy. And if you think that the snowball clause means that once an article is deleted, users should be banned for even suggesting a recreation, you're wrong. He simply doesn't have any right to play the role of an admin and close a deletion review simply because he is at odds with the article's subject. Nor does he have the right to label my edits as vandalism and revert my report on WP:AN of his disruptive behavior. Yet somehow he got away with it all without being blocked while I end up blocked for supposedly starting an edit war. Oh wait, no I didn't!

This post has been edited by Pussy Galore: Sun 4th May 2008, 2:00am

[Giggy]

He sure did, on Wikipedia we call it the [[WP:SNOW|snowball clause]].

I hope you were being sarcastic. The "snowball clause" is an essay, not a policy. And if you think that the snowball clause means that once an article is deleted, users should be banned for even suggesting a recreation, you're wrong. He simply doesn't have any right to play the role of an admin and close a deletion review simply because he is at odds with the article's subject. Nor does he have the right to label my edits as vandalism and revert my report on WP:AN of his disruptive behavior. Yet somehow he got away with it all without being blocked while I end up blocked for supposedly starting an edit war. Oh wait, no I didn't!

I wasn't being sarcastic. There was (and is) a very clear consensus on ED related stuff, and you knew this. Starting discussion with the purpose of making a fuss is something that should be closed to avoid epic dramaz. Sceptre did well there.

I agree with you, though, that he shouldn't have labelled your edits vandalism, or reverted your report. I'm not fully aware of context on that, so I won't comment further (simply commenting on what you've said). But that's neither here nor there - you weren't blocked because of an AN revert.

[dtobias]

Not so much a true consensus as it is a small faction of loudmouths who are adamant that there never be an article about that site, and a somewhat larger group that thinks it's best to humor that faction by avoiding the subject... anybody who believes otherwise gets shouted down.