SQUEAKbox, another cultic loser Options

[ColScott]

I foolishly trusted this guy and he had me banned.

TRUST none of them and scatter the cult to the four winds.

[Jon Awbrey]

I foolishly trusted this guy and he had me banned.

TRUST none of them and scatter the cult to the four winds.

Congratulations, you have have just advanced from Tenderpoot to Eagle Scott.

Jon

[ColScott]

I foolishly trusted this guy and he had me banned.

TRUST none of them and scatter the cult to the four winds.

Congratulations, you have have just advanced from Tenderpoot to Eagle Scott.

Jon

with a REDASS merit badge

[JohnA]

Look on the bright side. You now have much more time for the important stuff.

[The Joy]

I foolishly trusted this guy and he had me banned.

TRUST none of them and scatter the cult to the four winds.

Congratulations, you have have just advanced from Tenderpoot to Eagle Scott.

Jon

with a REDASS merit badge

This isn't about the Boy Scouts Wikia Spanking Art Scandal again, is it?

Seriously, I can't even read the words "Boy Scouts" without wanting to curse Jimbo and Gil Pen-something.

[thekohser]

SqueakBox has an endless capacity to do some really stupid stuff. The thing that irks me the most, I think, is when he jumps to the defense of Jimbo Wales on Jimbo's Talk page, whenever the heat gets turned up -- even slightly -- under the God-King's throne. The guy is a textbook Jimbo Sycophant.

I used to loathe him even more when he had "Happy editing!" in the signature of EVERY post -- so he could be telling you that you were blocked and never again welcome to edit, but then there would be that "Happy editing!" treacle. To his credit, he did change it to "Thanks!" when I pointed out how annoying was the previous note.

Another thing that's funny is that when he finds a sockpuppet, he'll revert what the sockpuppet had done, even if it means returning Wikipedia to a more butchered state that the sockpuppet had fixed.

[Gold heart]

I foolishly trusted this guy and he had me banned.

TRUST none of them and scatter the cult to the four winds.

Not foolishness. Maybe more a learning experience.

And the lesson. Never trust a cultist!

[Gold heart]

Another thing that's funny is that when he finds a sockpuppet, he'll revert what the sockpuppet had done, even if it means returning Wikipedia to a more butchered state that the sockpuppet had fixed.

That's quite common.

And what's more, he doesn't use spell-check!

Fowl, fowl, fowl!!!

[wikiwhistle]

Col or someone- could you link to what Col's unhappy about, only Squeaky was usually very supportive of him before, and I can't find out what's happened.

[Somey]

Col or someone- could you link to what Col's unhappy about, only Squeaky was usually very supportive of him before, and I can't find out what's happened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Per...onComplex#Block

[Milton Roe]

Col or someone- could you link to what Col's unhappy about, only Squeaky was usually very supportive of him before, and I can't find out what's happened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Per...onComplex#Block

Squeeky doesn't like socks. On WP, socks are for administrative use only.

[wikiwhistle]

Col or someone- could you link to what Col's unhappy about, only Squeaky was usually very supportive of him before, and I can't find out what's happened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Per...onComplex#Block

Just to say that squeaky can't directly block you himself- he's not an admin. I love how he says you are valued there lol I think what annoyed him was a month or so ago when under one of your other names or something you were making all those SEX with CHILDREN remarks (which I thought were tongue-in-cheek and amusing) and people thought you were a sock of him, so he ended up being checkusered (again).

[SqueakBox]

I foolishly trusted this guy and he had me banned.

TRUST none of them and scatter the cult to the four winds.

I certainly did not have you banned, Col. Thatcher banned you and I had mentioned nothing to him or anyone else, not sure why you think otherwise.

Col or someone- could you link to what Col's unhappy about, only Squeaky was usually very supportive of him before, and I can't find out what's happened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Per...onComplex#Block

Just to say that squeaky can't directly block you himself- he's not an admin. I love how he says you are valued there lol I think what annoyed him was a month or so ago when under one of your other names or something you were making all those SEX with CHILDREN remarks (which I thought were tongue-in-cheek and amusing) and people thought you were a sock of him, so he ended up being checkusered (again).

:Indeed, I was not happy myself that Col's useful latest incarnationw as blocked but I am not going to rock the system by complaining. Which is why I suggested and suggest that you try to get unblocked again as Col Scott

Col or someone- could you link to what Col's unhappy about, only Squeaky was usually very supportive of him before, and I can't find out what's happened.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Per...onComplex#Block

I simply told Co he was blocked and certainly remian sympathetic. I would never habve given nor do i support this block

[SqueakBox]

SqueakBox has an endless capacity to do some really stupid stuff. The thing that irks me the most, I think, is when he jumps to the defense of Jimbo Wales on Jimbo's Talk page, whenever the heat gets turned up -- even slightly -- under the God-King's throne. The guy is a textbook Jimbo Sycophant.

I used to loathe him even more when he had "Happy editing!" in the signature of EVERY post -- so he could be telling you that you were blocked and never again welcome to edit, but then there would be that "Happy editing!" treacle. To his credit, he did change it to "Thanks!" when I pointed out how annoying was the previous note.

Another thing that's funny is that when he finds a sockpuppet, he'll revert what the sockpuppet had done, even if it means returning Wikipedia to a more butchered state that the sockpuppet had fixed.

That was Giano who asked me to remove the happy editing template from my signature. And I bet you will find it hard to point out where I revert a sock unless that sock is pro pedophile pushing

[Somey]

...I am not going to rock the system by complaining. Which is why I suggested and suggest that you try to get unblocked again as Col Scott...

Why don't we also suggest that he singlehandedly end global warming, permanently solve the ongoing Mideast crisis, personally provide free, clean energy for the whole planet, and invent a spacecraft that can travel between stars and entire galaxies instantaneously while he's at it?

[SqueakBox]

Why don't we also suggest that he singlehandedly end global warming, permanently solve the ongoing Mideast crisis, personally provide free, clean energy for the whole planet, and invent a spacecraft that can travel between stars and entire galaxies instantaneously while he's at it?

Why not set him a difficult but worthwhile challenge, like getting Dmcdevit's checkuser status revoked?

Dmcdevit is the last, and I mean the last, check user whose powers I would want to see revoked Besides Accusations of sockpuppetry against SqueakBox,
note Thatcher did the last almost identical request and one of the socks accused of being me was in fact Col. The only sock I ever used was Skanking and that because I was blocked for a month and didn't want to...well undergo withdrawal symptons, lol

[One]

...I am not going to rock the system by complaining. Which is why I suggested and suggest that you try to get unblocked again as Col Scott...

Why don't we also suggest that he singlehandedly end global warming, permanently solve the ongoing Mideast crisis, personally provide free, clean energy for the whole planet, and invent a spacecraft that can travel between stars and entire galaxies instantaneously while he's at it?

Then he'd never have his article deleted.

[SqueakBox]

Dmcdevit is the last, and I mean the last, check user whose powers I would want to see revoked

Tell that to Gerry Lynch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ser:Gerry_Lynch

:Sure. When he offers practical help on the pedophile articles....until then, not a chance

[Milton Roe]

Dmcdevit is the last, and I mean the last, check user whose powers I would want to see revoked

Tell that to Gerry Lynch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ser:Gerry_Lynch

From his talk page, after getting repeatedly nailed for once sharing an open-proxy IP with Runcorn:

Blocking an IP for block evasion for nothing other than protesting their innocence should not happen . Ever. Blocking an established user for sharing an IP address with a troublesome user without supporting evidence should not happen. Ever. Blocking IP addresses that support a potentially maligned user, when there's no evidence they are a block evasion, as happened to the user at 77... on the Admin page, should not happen. Ever. I don't know how to go about creating a new policy here, but I'll gladly put the work in if a more experienced Wikipedian on meta issues, not things I've dipped my toe into before, can show me how.

Good luck with THOSE lame-ass ideas, Gerry Lynch. I note this was 10 mo ago, and the man has basically quit since-- about 40 edits since then, after being very productive previous to the block. A classic case of pissed off educated editor quit-itis. Soooo sorry. But there's more where he came from.

Start up Dr. Seuss special music:

You're a mean one, Mr. Lynch.
You really should forgive!
With Alison as your sidekick
But no apology from the hive,
Mr. Lynch.

You're a sock suspect forever--
But that's just how we live.

This post has been edited by Milton Roe: Tue 27th May 2008, 5:36am

[ColScott]

Dmcdevit is the last, and I mean the last, check user whose powers I would want to see revoked

Tell that to Gerry Lynch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ser:Gerry_Lynch

:Sure. When he offers practical help on the pedophile articles....until then, not a chance

Fact is you told me you banned me.

And now everyone of your cult is in my headlights. You all need to be exposed and removed from teh internets.