The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Raul654, Wikipedia's 2nd worst admin, probable leader of the cabal - so why
blissyu2
post Tue 6th June 2006, 2:42pm
Post #1


the wookie
*********

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



In our recent poll, we adjudged Raul654 to be Wikipedia's second worst administrator (after Slim Virgin, tied for 2nd with Snowspinner). Here we are, quite rightly having lots of information investigating Slim Virgin (moreso lately than overall, but overall still having more on Slim Virgin than anyone else). And whilst we have also had a half decent amount on Snowspinner, we've had practically nothing on Raul654.

Lir wrote a wonderful piece about Raul654, who was a major part of Lir's criticism of Wikipedia. We've agreed that he is probably a major part of the cabal, if not their leader. He is a high ranking administrator, bureaucrat and long-term Arb Com member, with meta admin status. He has added Lir's criticism to the spam black list, as well as Wikipedia Review.com (which was reversed by Eloquence eventually, but Lir's was not). He also added Wikitruth to the spam black list, which was later reversed. When I spoke to him on meta (the only time I've ever talked to him), he was rude, obnoxious, arrogant and very false.

So what do we have on this guy? If we can do that much to expose Slim Virgin, surely Raul654 deserves at least half as much attention. We need to catch up.

Why precisely is he such a bad administrator? Why would Wikipedia be better off without him? Why should Jimbo desysop him?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
thekohser
post Mon 16th April 2007, 2:55am
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Tue 6th June 2006, 10:42am) *

Why precisely is he such a bad administrator? Why would Wikipedia be better off without him? Why should Jimbo desysop him?

I did interact with Mark early on in the Wikipedia Review saga. At the time, he seemed to be open-minded enough, that I didn't consider him adversarial in any way. More recently, though, I've seen that he's definitely against me personally, or against the Wikipedia Review concept... I don't recall specifically, and I can't readily provide the "diffs". Anyway, since I've made his sh*tlist, then I guess he's on mine now, too.

By the way, he's supposedly studying at University of Delaware. I typically attend 2 to 4 home games of the Blue Hens each autumn. If anyone needs me to physically stalk Raul in person, I could be paid to do so.

(Kidding, folks.) Let's see how long it takes a Wikipedia admin to cite the above paragraph, conveniently expunging this paragraph, so it looks like another "threat" from Wikipedia Review.

Greg

This post has been edited by thekohser: Mon 16th April 2007, 7:25am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
blissyu2   Raul654   Tue 6th June 2006, 2:42pm
Herschelkrustofsky   My only encounter with Raul654 was brief, but tell...   Tue 6th June 2006, 10:19pm
blissyu2   That's a bit dodgy. Anything more?   Tue 6th June 2006, 10:30pm
Chahax   This is my very first post. I've been posting ...   Sun 15th April 2007, 6:18pm
guy   Welcome Chahax. I'm saddened by your story bu...   Sun 15th April 2007, 7:21pm
The Joy   User:Wizardman blocked Raul654 for breaking 3RRR f...   Sun 15th April 2007, 11:05pm
anon1234   User:Wizardman blocked Raul654 for breaking 3RRR ...   Sun 15th April 2007, 11:16pm
Vincent   User:Wizardman blocked Raul654 for breaking 3RRR ...   Mon 16th April 2007, 9:00pm
Cedric   (Kidding, folks.) Let's see how long it take...   Mon 16th April 2007, 4:02am
Poetlister   Is Cedric's avatar a deliberate copy of Raul65...   Mon 16th April 2007, 11:58am
Cedric   Is Cedric's avatar a deliberate copy of Raul6...   Mon 16th April 2007, 3:58pm
Somey   Nope. I don't believe I've ever seen it. ...   Mon 16th April 2007, 9:51pm
guy   And Anon1234's?   Mon 16th April 2007, 1:17pm
GlassBeadGame   Seems to me if I was a well intended ID type, m...   Mon 16th April 2007, 10:12pm
Chahax   Seems to me if I was a well intended ID type, ...   Tue 17th April 2007, 1:12am


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 6:29pm