SlimVirgin editing, publicity stunt ended, There never was any intention of leaving really, too addicted... Options

[Selina]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin?limit=100 (note she didn't go for more than 2 days without editing...)

I saved your userpage for you at http://wikipediareview.com/slimvirgin SV, you can restore it now this whole temper tantrum is over and you got what you wanted...

http://dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=slimvirgin.com

[Sgrayban]

Turning the blame to the US is POV.... There is no evidence that this was ever proven. The facts remain that Pan Am 301 crashed from a bomb... SV's edits ASSERT'S HER POV not facts cite by Governments or certified sources. So her edits do reflect the Jewish Community based on this.

And its EXTREMELY POV when she allows her feelings of a loss to run her editing on this subject.... common sense here people.

[jorge]

Turning the blame to the US is POV.... There is no evidence that this was ever proven. The facts remain that Pan Am 301 crashed from a bomb... SV's edits ASSERT'S HER POV not facts cite by Governments or certified sources. So her edits do reflect the Jewish Community based on this.

And its EXTREMELY POV when she allows her feelings of a loss to run her editing on this subject.... common sense here people.

I don't think she ever blamed the US, she just believes (I think) that it was the Iranians who did it not the Libyans.

This post has been edited by jorge: Thu 8th June 2006, 1:55pm

[Sgrayban]

Turning the blame to the US is POV.... There is no evidence that this was ever proven. The facts remain that Pan Am 301 crashed from a bomb... SV's edits ASSERT'S HER POV not facts cite by Governments or certified sources. So her edits do reflect the Jewish Community based on this.

And its EXTREMELY POV when she allows her feelings of a loss to run her editing on this subject.... common sense here people.

I don't think she ever blamed the US, she just believes (I think) that it was the Iranians who did it not the Libyans.

Actually she did blame the US ..... search the forum for "27 years" -- I made a paste of what she actually edited. It was clearly POV written on HER FEELINGS. Not cited as required or sourced. It's speculative and it still remains that way to this day.

She even said the man that was sent to prison for murder in Scotland was inocent. Speculative, unsourced, no cite. Writen on and by feelings. It is so POV is sucks.

The post is -> http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...148&#entry10148

[jorge]

Turning the blame to the US is POV.... There is no evidence that this was ever proven. The facts remain that Pan Am 301 crashed from a bomb... SV's edits ASSERT'S HER POV not facts cite by Governments or certified sources. So her edits do reflect the Jewish Community based on this.

And its EXTREMELY POV when she allows her feelings of a loss to run her editing on this subject.... common sense here people.

I don't think she ever blamed the US, she just believes (I think) that it was the Iranians who did it not the Libyans.

Actually she did blame the US ..... search the forum for "27 years" -- I made a paste of what she actually edited. It was clearly POV written on HER FEELINGS. Not cited as required or sourced. It's speculative and it still remains that way to this day.

She even said the man that was sent to prison for murder in Scotland was inocent. Speculative, unsourced, no cite. Writen on and by feelings. It is so POV is sucks.

The post is -> http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...148&#entry10148

I'm not sure how that post says she blamed the U.S. just that she thinks there was a miscarriage of justice. I think we need to cool down on saying SV is an anti semite/anti American/Israeli secret agent/whatever, she is a bad adminstrator yes but not those things.

[Sgrayban]

Actually she did blame the US ..... search the forum for "27 years" -- I made a paste of what she actually edited. It was clearly POV written on HER FEELINGS. Not cited as required or sourced. It's speculative and it still remains that way to this day.

She even said the man that was sent to prison for murder in Scotland was inocent. Speculative, unsourced, no cite. Writen on and by feelings. It is so POV is sucks.

The post is -> http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...148&#entry10148

I'm not sure how that post says she blamed the U.S. just that she thinks there was a miscarriage of justice. I think we need to cool down on saying SV is an anti semite/anti American/Israeli secret agent/whatever, she is a bad adminstrator yes but not those things.

You're not sure? Hmmm I thought the bold would show that....

America's second deadliest attack against civilians

Looks pretty bold and plain there to me....

That's what's very annoying about this, and why I see it as disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. I'm trying to write an article about a long, complicated, unpleasant business, which killed 270 people directly; which was triggered by attacks on Libya or Iran, and possibly both, which killed hundreds; which indirectly led to the deaths of many hundreds, and possibly thousands, of Libyans, because of UN sanctions against Libya, which led to things like planes crashing because of the lack of spare parts; and which may have led to a miscarriage of justice which has put a man in jail for 27 years. Not to mention that it was the UK's largest and most expensive criminal inquiry ever, America's second deadliest attack against civilians, and the only UK trial that I'm aware of to have taken place on foreign soil. All big issues. And yet I'm having to spend all my time on it discussing what a ton is, and whether people know what miles are. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:13, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

And of course she FAILS 100% to prove and cite/source her claims. They of course are POV based on her feelings of losing a friend. Its rational POV to her but irrational when no source backs this.