 Intelligent Design clique branching out, American Family Association |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
| Bob Boy |
 Thu 19th June 2008, 12:20pm
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Inactive Posts: 327 Joined: Tue 20th Nov 2007, 3:07pm Member No.: 3,899  |
Well, it looks like Orangemarlin is the group's designated hatchet man for this coatrack article, with some help from Odd nature:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association On ANI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adm...sonal_prejudice |
   |
 
|
| dogbiscuit |
Thu 19th June 2008, 1:15pm
Post
#2
|
 Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more? Group: Members Posts: 2,972 Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am From: The Midlands Member No.: 4,015 |
QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Thu 19th June 2008, 1:20pm)  Well, it looks like Orangemarlin is the group's designated hatchet man for this coatrack article, with some help from Odd nature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association On ANI: AN/I Hmm, something odd about the linking - it is adding a space before incidents and did not want to be fixed. Is that an outing in the edit summary per chance? IP address to retired user Jinx[m]chue. Inappropriate use of edit summaries I would say, but SOP. |
|
|
|
| Peter Damian |
Thu 19th June 2008, 2:06pm
Post
#3
|
 I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin! Group: Regulars Posts: 4,400 Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm Member No.: 4,212 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
As usual, difficult to tell exactly what is going on from the talk page and edits, and who is right or not. But there is this:
QUOTE I just have to mention how this paragraph as it was (and probably will be again) exposes a serious weakness in Wikipedia's methods. If you read the actual Agape Press article, it's obvious that they are reporting the comments of two clergymen and are not stating the beliefs of the AFA. Yet it was recorded in this article as if it was absolute fact that these were the beliefs of the AFA because someone somewhere at sometime misportrayed the article as stating the AFA's beliefs and "got it into print." Apparently, overzealous editors can have Wikipedia articles say anything about anyone (or any thing) no matter how inaccurate or even blatantly false as long as its printed somewhere. 67.135.49.116 (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| Moulton |
Thu 19th June 2008, 2:40pm
Post
#4
|
 Anthropologist from Mars Group: Contributors Posts: 10,220 Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm From: Greater Boston Member No.: 3,670 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
IP 67.135.49.116 has no reverse lookup, but the traceroute leads to Salt Lake City UT.
See also the colloquies on the talk page for that IP. The editor admits to being User:Jinxmchue. See also this version of that blocked/retired user's talk page. This post has been edited by Moulton: Thu 19th June 2008, 2:52pm |
|
|
|
| guy |
Thu 19th June 2008, 4:18pm
Post
#5
|
|
Postmaster General Group: Inactive Posts: 4,294 Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm From: London Member No.: 23 |
QUOTE Apparently, overzealous editors can have Wikipedia articles say anything about anyone (or any thing) no matter how inaccurate or even blatantly false as long as its printed somewhere. Isn't that exactly what WP:V and WP:RS say? |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd 5 13, 5:20am |