Odd Nature has been personally attacked! Options Rating

[LaraLove]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wik...#User:Dragon695

Of course, Orangemarlin and Filll show up to defend. And Kelly arrives to take Dragon695's side. It's just the same faces everywhere. I would chime in, but it's just not worth it. Filll can misuse any link to attempt to paint the picture he wants, but I'm not sure there's much defense for

Ah! I see Odd Nature has shown up to solicit a round from the ID boo-hoo brigade, well I stand by my statement. You and the rest of those WP:TE members of the ID Cabal will either change your attitude or face the music, so don't think the whole OrangeClownFish affair gets you off the hook. My comments pale in comparison to how rude, loutish, and completely out of control some of the things you guys do to newbies and unrelated editors who show up at pages your "Wikiproject" WP:OWNs. The so-called scientists who claim to defend science are actually hurting those of us who really care about science. Real scientists are gentlemen and scholars, not oafs and louts. If anyone wants diffs, the Intelligent Design RFC is chock full of them. --Dragon695 (talk) 18:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Although, Filll and Orangemarlin are really the last people who should be chiming in dismayed at incivility. And I don't think they caught the Finding Nemo reference.

[Cobalt]

I resent these personal attacks from Dragon695, and request an immediate retraction and apology. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Everyone wants retractions and an apology. But if this person got it, would it be sincere?

[LaraLove]

I resent these personal attacks from Dragon695, and request an immediate retraction and apology. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Everyone wants retractions and an apology. But if this person got it, would it be sincere?

I had not seen that. He has absolutely no right whatsoever to ask anyone for a retraction or an apology, and he should feel utter shame for even requesting it considering the filthy waste he spewed out about me, giggy and the_undertow. And now, not only has he refused to retract any of it AND refused to apologize, but he has twice now said that he was going to discuss this with me. Turns out that in addition to being completely hateful, he's also either a straight up liar or incapable of admitting when he's erred, and taking the time to deal with it.

Half the shit these over-sensitives claim to be uncivil comments or personal attacks are not even close to such. And what's further amusing is that Filll keeps a subpage of such abuses of these policies. It's utterly hilarious considering what he'll jump to claim as an attack against one of his own while being appalled if someone else makes the same such claims. This whole situation is fucktarded. After all the shit they've dished out to other editors, it's literally laughable to see them demand retractions and apologies. Especially Orangemarlin.

[GlassBeadGame]

I resent these personal attacks from Dragon695, and request an immediate retraction and apology. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Everyone wants retractions and an apology. But if this person got it, would it be sincere?

I had not seen that. He has absolutely no right whatsoever to ask anyone for a retraction or an apology, and he should feel utter shame for even requesting it considering the filthy waste he spewed out about me, giggy and the_undertow. And now, not only has he refused to retract any of it AND refused to apologize, but he has twice now said that he was going to discuss this with me. Turns out that in addition to being completely hateful, he's also either a straight up liar or incapable of admitting when he's erred, and taking the time to deal with it.

Half the shit these over-sensitives claim to be uncivil comments or personal attacks are not even close to such. And what's further amusing is that Filll keeps a subpage of such abuses of these policies. It's utterly hilarious considering what he'll jump to claim as an attack against one of his own while being appalled if someone else makes the same such claims. This whole situation is fucktarded. After all the shit they've dished out to other editors, it's literally laughable to see them demand retractions and apologies. Especially Orangemarlin.

It is hardly my place to suggest additional process or another layer of cranky dispute resolution for their club, put I can't resist suggesting some form of dueling to address these "personal attacks" that compromise the honor of noble Wikipedians. Perhaps they could be played out with a selection of oddly shaped dice assigned based on edit counts, admin status, etc. If the dice call for it the dueler would be "dead" and his/her account forfeited. Survivors might receive "dueling scars" to augment their ~~~~ signature. At least the whining would abate.

[Proabivouac]

I resent these personal attacks from Dragon695, and request an immediate retraction and apology. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Everyone wants retractions and an apology. But if this person got it, would it be sincere?

I had not seen that. He has absolutely no right whatsoever to ask anyone for a retraction or an apology, and he should feel utter shame for even requesting it considering the filthy waste he spewed out about me, giggy and the_undertow. And now, not only has he refused to retract any of it AND refused to apologize, but he has twice now said that he was going to discuss this with me. Turns out that in addition to being completely hateful, he's also either a straight up liar or incapable of admitting when he's erred, and taking the time to deal with it.

Half the shit these over-sensitives claim to be uncivil comments or personal attacks are not even close to such. And what's further amusing is that Filll keeps a subpage of such abuses of these policies. It's utterly hilarious considering what he'll jump to claim as an attack against one of his own while being appalled if someone else makes the same such claims. This whole situation is fucktarded. After all the shit they've dished out to other editors, it's literally laughable to see them demand retractions and apologies. Especially Orangemarlin.

It is hardly my place to suggest additional process or another layer of cranky dispute resolution for their club, put I can't resist suggesting some form of dueling to address these "personal attacks" that compromise the honor of noble Wikipedians. Perhaps they could be played out with a selection of oddly shaped dice assigned based on edit counts, admin status, etc. If the dice call for it the dueler would be "dead" and his/her account forfeited. Survivors might receive "dueling scars" to augment their ~~~~ signature. At least the whining would abate.

While grave incivility occurs on Wikipedia on a daily basis, editors are obliged to allege personal attacks and collect evidence to this effect. They are treated as slip-ups on the part of their opponents, and their number and quality, along with those of other slip-ups, determine the outcome of content disputes indirectly, through disciplinary measures. If you don't feel personally attacked, you're not playing it right.