Extraordinary message on my talk page, FT2 pops in for a cup of tea Options

[Peter Damian]

Well fancy that

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hinnibilis#Comment

He sadly makes no mention of the oversighted edits.

On the idea that he made 'minimal edits to Zoophilia' I rather think not.

Or if you can't wait for Kate's tool, his top edits are:

753 Zoophilia
391 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities
283 Labrador Retriever
250 Neuro-linguistic programming
220 Cultural and historical background of Jesus
147 Polyamory
134 Animal sexual behaviour
130 Christianity and Judaism
128 Principles of NLP
128 History of Wikipedia
126 Historical and cultural perspectives on zoophilia
126 Reliability of Wikipedia
117 Zoosexuality and the law
111 List of eighteenth century journals
110 NLP and science

[edit] I see the stupid fool is still editing my talk page with his endless tweaks. Oh well. I'm off to practice some Vivaldi.

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Thu 3rd July 2008, 7:15pm

[Docknell]

Well fancy that

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hinnibilis#Comment

He sadly makes no mention of the oversighted edits.

On the idea that he made 'minimal edits to Zoophilia' I rather think not.

Or if you can't wait for Kate's tool, his top edits are:

753 Zoophilia
391 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities
283 Labrador Retriever
250 Neuro-linguistic programming
220 Cultural and historical background of Jesus
147 Polyamory
134 Animal sexual behaviour
130 Christianity and Judaism
128 Principles of NLP
128 History of Wikipedia
126 Historical and cultural perspectives on zoophilia
126 Reliability of Wikipedia
117 Zoosexuality and the law
111 List of eighteenth century journals
110 NLP and science

[edit] I see the stupid fool is still editing my talk page with his endless tweaks. Oh well. I'm off to practice some Vivaldi.

Point 6 that FT2 makes is rather telling.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hinnibilis#Comment

He adds diffs of discussion, but totally avoids the issue of his own edits. He uses terms such as "slur campaign" to misrepresent what has been happening here in regard to the actual diffs showing him posting OR, multiple pov forking to promote NLP, protection of pederasty promotors, protection of NLP practitioners and so on.

Then he says he hopes it is not seen as aggressive?

Its aggressive alright. Aggressively sociopathic.

Basically, FT2 is working desperately to distract from his actual wrongdoings as shown in the diffs. He works hard to ban or slur editors who's diffs show a well sourced and well intended cleanup of his POV pushing distortions.

Distraction from material edits, and conflation of editors with alleged wrongdoers, is the only strategy that FT2 can attempt.

This post has been edited by Docknell: Fri 4th July 2008, 4:36am