Please see the topic which Malber has deliberately not linked to:
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=1388
There was never any call for "intimidation", as you can see I wanted this information in case I had to contact the UK police cybercrime unit or FBI regarding the planned attacks on Wikipedia Review. This was purely for self-defense purposes (as you can see by reading the topic) - Malber has a history of attacks and harassment against me and cannot be relied on to make any kind of neutral comment on this matter. He has been blocked[43] once for personal attacks against me and then again for repeatedly vandalising my talk page.

This is not the first time he has deliberately misrepresented events either, for example on the most recent version of my talk page you can see personal attacks including calling me a homophobic (I'm bisexual...), claiming that I gave his IP to daniel brandt (a lie simply because he doesn't know how brandt found him for hivemind he blames me. Having found stuff on google with his real name I think it was basically just sloppiness on his own part so he wants a scapegoat), claims that I banned anyone who defends Wikipedia and that I banned Golbez (totally untrue), and so on.

He has shown many signs of simply being bitter and bearing a grudge against me after getting him banned from the site after he spammed the board with photographs of penises.

I have never said anything like "Wikipedia Review's purpose is to destroy Wikipedia" and I don't think any of the staff share that sentiment either. In fact it's always been very much the opposite, Wikipedia needs constructive criticism in many cases to save it from itself.