The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ncmvocalist, The mad archiver...
jd turk
post Sat 26th July 2008, 6:37pm
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon 5th May 2008, 12:56am
Member No.: 5,976



As we talked about on the Beamathan thread, Ncmvocalist is continuing to step in and pretend he's an admin. On the Bedford ANI thread, Jimbo stepped in and desysopped him this morning. It's a fairly big deal, as evidenced by the ANI thread and the one that popped up here immediately. Two more editors made comments after Jimbo, and then ten minutes later Ncmvocalist, in all his not-an-admin glory, closes the thread.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=228024282

My favorite shiza-stirrer Beamathan jumps right back in to tell him he was premature, and three minutes later Ncmvocalist closes it again...

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=228024640

with the edit summary "this is not a forum."

(Beam also talked some smack to Jimbo on the same thread. I'm liking this guy for the sheer chaos he leaves in his wake.)

Ryan Postlethwaite reopened it, and left a message on his talk page that hasn't been responded to yet.

Since he's been warned before about premature (within minutes) archiving, I'm starting to wonder if he's doing this on purpose, or if he really just doesn't get it.

EDIT: And now ThuranX has called him out on the Obama pages, formally requesting he stay off of them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=228032923

Ncm snarkily denies him and reverts anyway...

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=228036806

This post has been edited by jd turk: Sat 26th July 2008, 7:17pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bob Boy
post Sat 26th July 2008, 7:00pm
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue 20th Nov 2007, 3:07pm
Member No.: 3,899



Agreed, dipshit admin wannabe.

Doesn't he/she also engage in the dumb practice of moving discussions to subpages, which automatically kills them?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post Sun 27th July 2008, 12:03am
Post #3


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Mon 30th Jul 2007, 11:41pm
Member No.: 2,143




I can't locate statements to support my previous assertion, so I've removed it for now.


This post has been edited by tarantino: Sun 27th July 2008, 1:41am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Random832
post Sun 27th July 2008, 5:51am
Post #4


meh
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,933
Joined: Thu 14th Feb 2008, 8:52pm
Member No.: 4,844

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Bob Boy @ Sat 26th July 2008, 7:00pm) *

Agreed, dipshit admin wannabe.

Doesn't he/she also engage in the dumb practice of moving discussions to subpages, which automatically kills them?


I have to respond to this, since I invented that practice (Well, I came up with it independently, and it wasn't common until after I'd done so; I don't know if anyone had done it before)

The reason is that ANI is enormous, and by the time a discussion is that large (some taking up as much as a third of the page, during otherwise slow weeks) three things are true
1) The discussion is mostly between people who really care about the issue, and will continue discussing it wherever it is
2) Either nobody else cares, or it's complex enough to need a large number of sections of its own
3) It's been there for weeks, and will probably remain open for weeks more

This post has been edited by Random832: Sun 27th July 2008, 5:53am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
prospero
post Sun 27th July 2008, 4:32pm
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue 27th May 2008, 4:17pm
Member No.: 6,357

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Thank you! This is getting sooo anoying. True AN/I is not truth and reconciliation, but swift archiving often leads to false assertions being allowed to stand.

As for Beam, while I wholeheartedly believe in pot stirring, I also think that Beam is going way beyond this. He's just causing trouble.

Edit: I know this might fly in the face of logic, but I wonder if Beam is Tony's bad-hand account? The "mistakes" being intentionally "peppered" in to throw off sock-puppet suspicion.

This post has been edited by prospero: Sun 27th July 2008, 4:35pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Thu 31st July 2008, 11:32pm
Post #6


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,915
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



I complained about Ncmvocalist closing a Wikiquette thread prematurely that was of a dispute between myself and a friend of his, and I was blocked for asking him to retract it (he complained on AN/I about it).

I'm glad to see that others aren't tolerating his closing of threads on AN/I.

Sigh.

Wiki drama sucks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Giggy
post Thu 31st July 2008, 11:34pm
Post #7


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 755
Joined: Mon 31st Mar 2008, 3:02am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5,552

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Welcome to WR, Ottava! You're not alone in being somewhat frustrated by this guy's archiving - I told him as much a few days back and was accused of trolling (but then, I post here, so he's probably right ph34r.gif ).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
everyking
post Fri 1st August 2008, 12:14am
Post #8


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81



QUOTE(Giggy @ Fri 1st August 2008, 12:34am) *

Welcome to WR, Ottava! You're not alone in being somewhat frustrated by this guy's archiving - I told him as much a few days back and was accused of trolling (but then, I post here, so he's probably right ph34r.gif ).


I feel somewhat fortunate--when I complained to him about it, all he did was talk to me like I was an idiot, then ignored me when I continued to complain.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Fri 1st August 2008, 12:14am
Post #9


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,915
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Well, I figured that since I will be indef banned by Bishonen, that I would have to join. Isn't that what all the other people banned by her do? smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 4:19am