Who is Janeyryan? Options

[Eva Destruction]

And by the way, I'd love to get hold of BJWeeks or whoever developed the Wikistalk tool so that I could request an additional "all articles" category.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Bjweeks – set up a sock with a freemail account if you don't want to disclose your WP identity/email address. There might be a technical reason to do with server load as to why it can't be done.

[Milton Roe]

And by the way, I'd love to get hold of BJWeeks or whoever developed the Wikistalk tool so that I could request an additional "all articles" category.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Bjweeks – set up a sock with a freemail account if you don't want to disclose your WP identity/email address. There might be a technical reason to do with server load as to why it can't be done.

No, for "all articles" was the way it originally worked, and that's all you got was that list. The way it runs now is more complicated. The "all articles" is merely the sum of the subcategories, but it's not automatic.

Thanks for the WP username-- I should have checked to see if there was one.

[Cla68]

It appears that Janeyryan's attitude is starting to wear thin on someone. The discussion in question is on the Naked Short Selling talk page.

Janeyryan appears to particularly concerned with how the DTCC is portrayed.

One other thing, Janeyryan did some maintenance work on Chip Berlet's talk page today. Weird.

This post has been edited by Cla68: Tue 4th November 2008, 7:22am

[Piperdown]

It appears that Janeyryan's attitude is starting to wear thin on someone. The discussion in question is on the Naked Short Selling talk page.

Janeyryan appears to particularly concerned with how the DTCC is portrayed.

One other thing, Janeyryan did some maintenance work on Chip Berlet's talk page today. Weird.

i'd hope by now that gary has finally found a CU-proof method to his wikiness. he has years of practice, and has certainly attained a B.S., Bachelor of Socking.

hazy janey and good johnny have certainly become WP:BOLD at the same time, suddenly....note which one has the annual varkala vacation break in their editing history. you'd think that part of india would have gotten better net access by now.

NSS article was getting 40K hits a day during the stock market meltdown recently. There are a lot of people who's careers directly depend on it being allowed, and they're not very happy about the "temporary" time-out on it around the world.

the part about it being argued that "Shapiro is one of the people suing the DTCC" and so is not an expert is hilarious. The guy was the US undersecretary of Commerce or something, not an ambulence chaser. And the protest is coming from the same guy who used to post "studies" naysaying NSS's effects from some canadian sources of very dubious neutrality on the matter.

one "tell" that gary is having fun on NSS either directly or indirectly is the renewed emphasis on the incredible coflicting acrobatic verbage of the SEC's own website....the 2005-ish FAQ vs SEC Chairman Cox's statements and actions on NSS since (specifically in the last 14 months). He cherry-picked that FAQ and held onto the parts he liked, for dear wikilife. While skewering the same SEC on his blog, lol. The only person he hates worse than Bagley/Bynre now is Chris Cox, who has taken the precious away from gary gollum's ringwraiths.

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Tue 4th November 2008, 11:14am

[Herschelkrustofsky]

hazy janey and good johnny have certainly become WP:BOLD at the same time, suddenly....

Fans of irony will enjoy the latest at Talk:Lyndon LaRouche, where a new batch of pro-LaRouche socks have been caught up in Will Beback's dragnet, and Janey and Johnny are holding forth on how socks must never be allowed to comment on the talk page.

Also, Janey is making with the talk-page blanking schtick, just like John Nevard. One wonders if there is some sort of training camp they attend before they can be accepted into the Sacred Order of the Slim Virgin.

[tarantino]

Fans of irony will enjoy the latest at Talk:Lyndon LaRouche, where a new batch of pro-LaRouche socks have been caught up in Will Beback's dragnet, and Janey and Johnny are holding forth on how socks must never be allowed to comment on the talk page.

This is rather odd.

The mostly inactive David Gerard had quietly blocked four accounts as checkuser-confirmed sockpuppets of Gnetwerker (now known as 7265 (T-C-L-K-R-D) ). Two of the accounts, Guillermo Ugarte (T-C-L-K-R-D) and ClarkLewis (T-C-L-K-R-D) , were interrupting the status quo on LaRouche-related pages. In the 4 years and 3000 edits before being blocked, Gnetwerker (or his various prior socks that I checked) never touched those.

A day later, Cirt tags ClarkLewis but not the other 3 and recreates "Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gnetwerker".Did he check with SlimVirgin who deleted that page along with dozens of others last year "as agreed". I wonder what was agreed, and if it has now been breached?

Will Beback had been so sure that the account Guillermo Ugarte was a returning Herschelkrustofsky.

I have now analyzed Guilermo Ugarte's contributions and find that they follow the same pattern as the HK socks. Based on that analysis, on the similarity of edits, and on the new account's arrival shortly after the blocking of previous socks, I am confident that this is another HK sock account. I can give more details by email. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Using the intersecting contributions tool, we see that three of the four newly blocked accounts, besides editing LaRouche stuff, do share some common interests with Gnetwerker.

Gnetwerker and Hiro Antagonist (135 edits | registered at: 2008-09-09)
1. Portland,_Oregon
2. Reed_College
3. Sea_kayak
4. Talk:Reed_College
5. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR

Gnetwerker and ClarkLewis (146 edits | registered at: 2007-03-17)

1. Intel_Corporation
2. Microsoft
3. Reed_College
4. Steven_McGeady
5. Talk:Microsoft
6. Talk:Reed_College

Gnetwerkwer and Guillermo Ugarte (10 edits | registered at: 2007-06-28)

1. Plan_9_from_Bell_Labs
2. Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration

So ¿Quién es mas macho? The checkuser wielding David Gerard or Will Beback with his finely-honed linguistic skills?

[Piperdown]

Let me get this straight.

There's a WP article spefically called "Views Of Lyndon Larouche".

And any material coming from a Lyndon Larouche run website can't be cited on it?

huh?

Maybe I'm reading that article title wrong. Does it mean "Other People's Views Of Lyndon Larouche", or does it mean "Lyndon Larouche's Views"?

That's like saying the "Gary Weiss" article can't use gary-weiss.blogspot.com as a source for gary's own views on his own BLP.

That's nuts.

If WP doesn't want Lyndon Larouche's Views known, then don't have an article on it.

And just what is the big fucking deal with Lyndon Larouche on Wikipedia? Who gives a shit really? This isn't 1980 any more, and he hasn't been in the public eye since.

And Dennis King.

How in can anyone justify allowing a WP editor to cite themselves on articles other than their own BLP, if even then?

Really?

Willbeback is a hypocritical wanker.

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Thu 6th November 2008, 1:35am

[Piperdown]

NSS article was getting 40K hits a day during the stock market meltdown recently. There are a lot of people who's careers directly depend on it being allowed, and they're not very happy about the "temporary" time-out on it around the world.

the part about it being argued that "Shapiro is one of the people suing the DTCC" and so is not an expert is hilarious. The guy was the US undersecretary of Commerce or something, not an ambulence chaser. And the protest is coming from the same guy who used to post "studies" naysaying NSS's effects from some canadian sources of very dubious neutrality on the matter.

one "tell" that gary is having fun on NSS either directly or indirectly is the renewed emphasis on the incredible coflicting acrobatic verbage of the SEC's own website....the 2005-ish FAQ vs SEC Chairman Cox's statements and actions on NSS since (specifically in the last 14 months). He cherry-picked that FAQ and held onto the parts he liked, for dear wikilife. While skewering the same SEC on his blog, lol. The only person he hates worse than Bagley/Bynre now is Chris Cox, who has taken the precious away from gary gollum's ringwraiths.

Former SEC lawyer Brent Baker has a blog, and has an issue to take up with Gary Moreland.

http://www.sectales.com/2009/02/gary-weiss...s-straight.html

This part is especially good:

Guess what? Patrick and the DeepCapture folks are all correct. I saw it from within the belly of the beast and I can honestly tell you that "bent journalists" are more of a problem for our capital markets than "retailating issuers."

Baker's done some work with the folks on the opposite side of Mantan. As opposed to the on-call SEC lackeys who were hoping to get cushy hedgie/brokerage jobs by doing on-demand "investigations" of stocks that were not oddly just added to the short lists of their friendlies. Well those SEC lackeys are shit out of luck in the new world order of wall street. The good ones like Baker, and the good ones that the SEC pushed out like Gary Aguirre, are being vindicated. Aguirre's son is famous for his Donnie Darko soundtrack cover of "Mad World" and sports a WP BLP himself.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Aguirre

time for some Gary Aquirre disambiguation and give Gary Jules Aguirre's dad his own WP:BLP:

http://www.sandiegomagazine.com/media/San-...d-Gary-Aguirre/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...9010703894.html

http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/testi...437&wit_id=5941

http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-...gation-Reopened

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=ema...id=amVY3Ff01cD8

This post has been edited by Piperdown: Mon 9th February 2009, 1:13am

[Herschelkrustofsky]

Aguirre is a cool dude. I was familiar with him because of this interview on Truthout, where he strongly implies that the real agenda behind Paulson's bailout policy is to cover up all the other Ponzi schemes out there that haven't been exposed yet.