Arbcom Elections 2008 Options

[Rootology]

Official link: Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008

List or arbiters whose terms expire:
1. Blnguyen
2. Charles Matthews
3. James F.
4. Morven
5. Thebainer

Expiring arbiters who have said they will not seek re-election:
(Please reply with others who have said as much, I'll update this top level post)
1. Morven (here)

Expiring arbiters who have previously won re-election:
(Please reply with others who have pulled this off, I'll update this top level post)
1. ?

Number of open seats (normal): 5, plus one extra open one since Paul August retired, for 6 total. Paul's spot is only good to December 2009, when he would have expired anyway. The others are currently set to be the normal 3 years.

This post has been edited by Rootology: Fri 29th August 2008, 4:53am

[maiawatatos]

I wouldn't support any if those if they did decide to run - CM may be the best of a bad bunch, but in this case, that's not saying anything.

James F., Morven and Thebainer will certainly not be missed for even a millisecond.

[Proabivouac]

James F., Morven and Thebainer will certainly not be missed for even a millisecond.

I nominate Morven's wife Alana Brown to take his place on ArbCom:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/morven/sets/371552/

Charles Matthews was of course responsible for Poetlister's first unblock.

This is interesting. Can you share a link?

This post has been edited by Proabivouac: Fri 29th August 2008, 7:44am

[KamrynMatika]

James F., Morven and Thebainer will certainly not be missed for even a millisecond.

I nominate Morven's wife Alana Brown to take his place on ArbCom:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/morven/sets/371552/

Can we please not have random nasty pot shots at completely uninvolved and unrelated people?

[thekohser]

James F., Morven and Thebainer will certainly not be missed for even a millisecond.

I nominate Morven's wife Alana Brown to take his place on ArbCom:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/morven/sets/371552/

Can we please not have random nasty pot shots at completely uninvolved and unrelated people?

It does at least speak to the notion of "Could you imagine an Encyclopedia Britannica editor taking someone sporting this level of personal character to the company holiday dinner?"

There is a huge difference between the interests (Pokemon, hogtie, Harry Potter, etc.) and outward "I'm here to be me, not to conform to any boring standards of Western civilization" attitudes that pervade Wikipedia, and the traditional professional interests (13th century philosophy, the Congress of Vienna, quasars, General Cable Corporation, etc.), meticulousness, and conformist attitudes that would pervade any PUBLISHED general encyclopedia.

I'm just sayin'...

[Rootology]

James F., Morven and Thebainer will certainly not be missed for even a millisecond.

I nominate Morven's wife Alana Brown to take his place on ArbCom:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/morven/sets/371552/

Can we please not have random nasty pot shots at completely uninvolved and unrelated people?

It does at least speak to the notion of "Could you imagine an Encyclopedia Britannica editor taking someone sporting this level of personal character to the company holiday dinner?"

No, it really doesn't...

It's just mean busting on people that don't look like the fake middle-America Abercrombie & Fitch-look that society seems to hold to be true for this country. Who cares what people look like? Society as a whole absolutely is NOT defined by the mores and values of white middle America and thankfully never ever will be.





Can Mods please aggressively police this thread by splitting off stuff whenever it gets into pointless sniping about people's appearances of all things, and the inevitable "Free Poetlister" history lessons (sorry, Taxwoman)

This post has been edited by Rootology: Fri 29th August 2008, 1:19pm

[thekohser]

Who cares what people look like?

About 95% of employers, for one.

Look, your appendix is inflamed, it will rupture in the next 4 minutes, but at least you're in the Emergency Room. Two doctors walk in your room. One looks like me. The other looks like Alana Brown. They say, in unison, "Rootology, you must choose which of us two shall perform your appendectomy."

Who do you choose?

[Rootology]

Who cares what people look like?

About 95% of employers, for one.

Look, your appendix is inflamed, it will rupture in the next 4 minutes, but at least you're in the Emergency Room. Two doctors walk in your room. One looks like me. The other looks like Alana Brown. They say, in unison, "Rootology, you must choose which of us two shall perform your appendectomy."

Who do you choose?

95% of employers in what area? Back down to that city vs. country bit, again, that you and I keep poking each other about. But that's apples and oranges and won't get settled.

Assuming they're both doctors, I'd go with Alana (I have no idea who this is but I assume she's punk rock based on a few searches) based on the fact that she would be more likely to be daring enough to take a risk to save my life if things went south. I'd generally prefer to bet on the creative driven types, if I had to choose. But that's me.

[thekohser]

Assuming they're both doctors, I'd go with Alana...

I admire your thinking.

But, I assure you, if we took a truly random sample of 1,000 world citizens and presented them with the exact same case study (I'm imagining at least a half-dozen pairwise control photo sorts, with Alana and me as the "ringer" test case), the large majority (dare I say, at least 800?) would not select Alana to perform their emergency, but routine, surgery.

If you have $100,000 lying around, I think we could run this study across n=50 in each of 20 different countries. I'd be willing to wager up to $1,000 with "800" as the over/under, me taking the over.