The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Checkuser data retention
gomi
post Mon 15th September 2008, 5:12pm
Post #1


Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm
Member No.: 565




here:

QUOTE
Tim Starling tstarling at wikimedia.org
Thu Sep 11 03:11:52 UTC 2008

Jon wrote:
> I could not find this in the privacy policy... however, what is
> Wikimedia's current data retention policy? That is to ask, how long do
> projects keep data for use in tools such as checkuser?

CheckUser data used to be kept for 3 months, but Aaron recently increased
it to 5 months. I'm not sure why or on whose authority.

<http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/CheckUser/CheckUser.php?r1=39734&r2=40620>

-- Tim Starling



User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
gomi
post Mon 15th September 2008, 5:48pm
Post #2


Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm
Member No.: 565



I should hasten to add that there are probably site-specific overrides possible, and it is well within the realm of possibility that Wikipedia uses one. That would explain why Starling was so cavalier about giving out the above information.

More on the subject, from the same thread:

QUOTE
Tim Starling tstarling at wikimedia.org
Thu Sep 11 04:26:16 UTC 2008

Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I think Jon was inquiring about more than just checkuser (notice the
> "such as"). I would assume that anyone asking about data retention in
> general is not overly concerned with the specific modes of retention,
> but is more concerned with the maximum retention time (across all
> modes) of any particular type of private data.

The other logs are not automatically rotated, and need to be manually
purged. The retention time is thus not consistent. Typically we have kept
around 6 months of data. There are error logs, and logs for various kinds
of special requests. They are not used for sockpuppet investigation.

I've said in the past that I think 6 months would be a reasonable horizon
for all private data -- it would give us plenty of data for operations,
and would be a far shorter period than that used by the large commercial
websites.

-- Tim Starling


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
gomi   Checkuser data retention   Mon 15th September 2008, 5:12pm
Rootology   Kelly said recently that the Checkuser data was mo...   Mon 15th September 2008, 5:25pm
Kelly Martin   Kelly said recently that the Checkuser data was mo...   Mon 15th September 2008, 5:38pm
gomi   I should hasten to add that there are probably sit...   Mon 15th September 2008, 5:48pm
C H   Note, Tim Starling has since reverted the change t...   Mon 15th September 2008, 8:59pm
anthony   Who is this developer Aaron Aaron Schulz a.k.a....   Tue 16th September 2008, 2:53am
jch   [quote name='C H' post='129925' date='Mon 15th Se...   Fri 19th September 2008, 6:29am
Lar   [quote name='anthony' post='130007' date='Tue 16t...   Fri 19th September 2008, 4:28pm
jch   [quote name='anthony' post='130007' date='Tue 16...   Sat 20th September 2008, 2:10am
Rootology   Links to the mail reversions?   Mon 15th September 2008, 9:01pm
C H   [quote name='Rootology' post='129926' date='Mon 1...   Mon 15th September 2008, 9:15pm
Kelly Martin   [quote name='Rootology' post='129926' date='Mon ...   Tue 16th September 2008, 1:02am
Rootology   The curious question here is: does each project ac...   Mon 15th September 2008, 9:11pm
Random832   The curious question here is: does each project a...   Tue 16th September 2008, 12:34am
Rootology   Last night I poked around all the listed materials...   Fri 19th September 2008, 5:57pm
Kelly Martin   Last night I poked around all the listed material...   Sat 20th September 2008, 2:31am
Krimpet   Last night I poked around all the listed material...   Sat 20th September 2008, 2:46am
tarantino   I think it can be confidently said, then, that CU...   Sat 20th September 2008, 2:44pm


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th 5 13, 1:26am