| |
|
  |
Sam Blacketer |
|
|
| Random832 |
Fri 22nd May 2009, 4:54pm
|
meh
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,933
Joined: Thu 14th Feb 2008, 8:52pm
Member No.: 4,844
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(One @ Wed 12th November 2008, 3:43am)  Incidentally, is this really important? His name is one thing - people are always going to disagree on that here - but I think that if he previously had a different username notorious enough for someone to reasonably make a statement like "If Jimmy and the voters had known what his older account was, he probably wouldn't be an arb today.", it's worth knowing that.QUOTE(Proabivouac @ Thu 13th November 2008, 2:46am)  We don't actually know he didn't identify himself as MB - none of the other ones were ever certified identified, so Cary wouldn't have necessarily been reasonably expected to see a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| the fieryangel |
Fri 22nd May 2009, 8:40pm
|

the Internet Review Corporation is watching you...
       
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,990
Joined: Tue 21st Nov 2006, 9:49pm
From: It's all in your mind anyway...
Member No.: 577

|
QUOTE(Alex @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 8:25pm)  He's now identified. Not that that means much though. Anybody who's on Arbcom who hasn't publicly id'ed themselves is probably hiding something. Does anybody doubt that people are editing WP to push the POVs of outside entities? That one or more these types has gotten elected to arbcom should be no surprise, especially when pseudos are the norm. The solutions? Simple: requiring people in positions of trust to disclose identities and conflicts of interest. This isn't rocket science, folks. I'll be very surprised if only one of the non-ided arbs has a hidden agenda.... QUOTE(Alex @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 8:25pm)  He's now identified. Not that that means much though. If the WMF foundation thinks that saying "we know who this is" is going to solve this problem, they're hopelessly naïve...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CrazyGameOfPoker |
Fri 22nd May 2009, 10:00pm
|

Senior Member
   
Group: Regulars
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu 9th Mar 2006, 12:19am
Member No.: 58

|
QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 5:26pm)  QUOTE(tarantino @ Tue 11th November 2008, 11:31pm)  Are there any of you Wikipedians out there who have met the most secretive of the current arbs, Sam? It's probable that he's using a pseudonym. Though he used to sign his emails "Sam Blacketer London E15", all the phone books and people directories I checked show no instances of that name anywhere in the UK. Additionally he is the only one out the 13 who does not have either the CU or oversight tools and has not verified his identity with the WMF. I thought there was a requirement that you must be at least 18 to be an arb. How has he proven this? Er, you lost me. Thirteen? There are 16 current Arbs.... Uh... check the date
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MZMcBride |
Fri 22nd May 2009, 10:05pm
|

Über Member
    
Group: Regulars
Posts: 671
Joined: Wed 25th Mar 2009, 5:02am
Member No.: 10,962
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(CrazyGameOfPoker @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 6:00pm)  QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 5:26pm)  QUOTE(tarantino @ Tue 11th November 2008, 11:31pm)  Are there any of you Wikipedians out there who have met the most secretive of the current arbs, Sam? It's probable that he's using a pseudonym. Though he used to sign his emails "Sam Blacketer London E15", all the phone books and people directories I checked show no instances of that name anywhere in the UK. Additionally he is the only one out the 13 who does not have either the CU or oversight tools and has not verified his identity with the WMF. I thought there was a requirement that you must be at least 18 to be an arb. How has he proven this? Er, you lost me. Thirteen? There are 16 current Arbs.... Uh... check the dateOh, bah. Is it really so hard to start a new topic? When these things span months and have long gaps, I always get confused.  Thanks for the clarification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| trenton |
Sat 23rd May 2009, 7:10am
|
Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri 12th Sep 2008, 10:21pm
Member No.: 8,237

|
QUOTE(CrazyGameOfPoker @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 4:03pm)  QUOTE(trenton @ Fri 22nd May 2009, 4:33pm)  it's kinda funny looking at that page. What kind of job is it to follow Cary Bass around and fix his edits? How long will it take before Cary Bass realizes how to add people and edit the page correctly?
Well I guess it's a small miracle that Cary Bass at least manages to put them in alphabetical order.
Nearly impossible given that the data the guy keeps adding is a diff link that's only generated after Cary adds the name.  I know, which is why I said add and edit.... but still the guy has his little helpers following him around. Teach a guy to fish and all that.... QUOTE I've complained about the inability to generate this sort of link at edit time before.
There are some things a wiki is not suited for and this may be one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RMHED |
Sat 23rd May 2009, 6:43pm
|
Über Member
    
Group: Regulars
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri 8th May 2009, 8:48pm
Member No.: 11,716
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sat 23rd May 2009, 7:26pm)  QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Sat 23rd May 2009, 9:53am)  QUOTE(tarantino @ Thu 13th November 2008, 2:20am)  So we have a UK Wikipedian, with what can be construed as a misleading identity, that is well-versed in the MMORPG and exhibits antipathy towards Greg. Why does this sound familiar?
You can add "interested in Wikiquote" to this list if the old account as what I think. So I was right: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/User:FysProbably called David, likely works for Westminster City Council went to St Catharine's College, Cambridge in the early 90's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| zvook |
Sat 23rd May 2009, 7:29pm
|
Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon 22nd Dec 2008, 3:21am
Member No.: 9,484

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CharlotteWebb |
Sat 23rd May 2009, 8:06pm
|

Postmaster General
       
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,740
Joined: Mon 18th Jun 2007, 2:09am
Member No.: 1,727
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE *01:14, 15 February 2006 Fys (talk | contribs) unblocked "Dbiv (talk | contribs)" (Yes, I know I am not supposed to do this. Justification 1: Block was wrongly applied. Justification 2: I have a major edit which I am not going to lose come what may. WP:IAR applies)
Entries like this become confusing when a user is renamed. The subject of the above sentence is stored as a number (his user id 55217) but the direct object is stored as text (log_title == "Dbiv" && log_namespace == "2"). This is the name of the target page/user at the time the action was taken. One part of the data reflects the name change, as viewing the log looks up the new name based on the user_id number which remains the same, but old data is used for second part. In effect it becomes less obvious that he unblocked himself, which is usually considered the highest form of admin abuse. This is inherently more serious than whatever was done to warrant the block, whether it was justified or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |